Board logo

標題: England has QUALIFIED for 2006 World Cup [打印本頁]

作者: arthur8088    時間: 2005-10-9 06:50 AM     標題: England has QUALIFIED for 2006 World Cup

http://home.skysports.com/list.a ... skysports_home_page

England will play in next summer's World Cup, with results elsewhere ensuring their participation in Germany in 2006.

Holland's triumph over Czech Republic, coupled with England's win over Austria ensured that Sven Goran Eriksson's side are guaranteed a place in Germany 2006, as either one of the best runners up or, should they beat Poland on Wednesday, as a group winners.

The news will be a welcome relief for under fire England boss Eriksson, who watched his side scrape to a 1-0 victory but at the expense of captain David Beckham who was sent off.

Although England will look to get through a period of dreadful form, including two lacklustre 1-0 wins against Wales and Austria and a dismal defeat to Northern Ireland, with victory over Poland - it is no longer crucial to their qualification.

Holland beat Czech Republic 2-0 away from home, with Rafael van der Vaart and Barry Opdam likely to have made themselves popular figures in the England dressing room.

Swedish tactician Eriksson was thrilled with the news.

"Of course, I'm delighted," he said. "I didn't expect it to come so early. I expected us to have to beat Poland. But we now know we have qualified, which is fantastic.


"I'd like to thank the players, who have been absolutely brilliant. We know that we didn't perform well against Northern Ireland but today was fantastic and now we are at the World Cup.

"The tension for Wednesday's game will obviously now be much less.

"I know we have struggled this season but today I was very pleased. I know that in Germany, if we don't get too many injuries, we could do very well."

Eriksson's skipper Beckham added: "It's great. The lads are jumping around. It's nice to get through and it would be good to win the game on Wednesday and win the group.

"This team has stuck together, the manager has stuck by the players and we've got our just desserts tonight.

"There has been some criticism but we've taken it on the chin, got on with it and now we have qualified.

"Hopefully we can go all the way in Germany. If I didn't believe that, it would be wrong for me to be captain, but I genuinely believe it."




Oh mate....I'm so delighted they are one of the best runners-up.....and now the match VS Poland suddenly became meaningless....

2 teams can qualify through the world cup as the best runners-up


[ Last edited by arthur8088 on 2005-10-9 at 07:22 AM ]
作者: brightlee    時間: 2005-10-9 08:12 AM

Thx for your news.
we may be concentrating to look at France group....
this is the real "group of death" now....hahhahahah
作者: chicken    時間: 2005-10-9 12:31 PM

I happy for England qualification, but I have to say:
Erikson, your are so lucky!

[ Last edited by chicken on 2005-10-9 at 12:34 PM ]
作者: leeyanta    時間: 2005-10-9 02:11 PM

下場對波蘭變咗例行公事
作者: bigfish    時間: 2005-10-9 02:40 PM

好彩o者
下場冇碧咸實散晒都似
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-9 02:49 PM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-9 14:40:
好彩o者
下場冇碧咸實散晒都似
下場隨時大勝,有冇碧咸就好閒,但冇壓力就好緊要,英格蘭隊波次次都係死在'壓力'之下,d無關痛癢賽事佢地成日都打得好(仲要主場)
作者: shaqkobe    時間: 2005-10-9 02:52 PM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-9 14:49:

下場隨時大勝,有冇碧咸就好閒,但冇壓力就好緊要,英格蘭隊波次次都係死在'壓力'之下,d無關痛癢賽事佢地成日都打得好(仲要主場)
係呀。佢地係有實力,不過有時踼落就搏手搏腳,成日攻極都開唔到紀錄。
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-9 03:01 PM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-9 14:52:

係呀。佢地係有實力,不過有時踼落就搏手搏腳,成日攻極都開唔到紀錄。
英格蘭世界排名高,但國際賽成績屎(66年之後未贏過國際賽錦標,最叻都係入4強)排名成績唔成比例,都係因為佢地唔懂得應付壓力,d外圍賽友誼賽就成日贏攞好多分,但一到決賽週就最後階段就次次死,射親12碼都例輸
作者: shaqkobe    時間: 2005-10-9 03:08 PM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-9 15:01:

英格蘭世界排名高,但國際賽成績屎(6...
始終英格蘭都係以年輕球員掛師,老極果個算係今場至有既蘇金寶。太後生,對陣上黎經驗唔夠就難以發揮。雖然有拼勁,球員各有才華。但係各球員都效力世界頂級聯賽既球會,要佢地齊人練波都唔係易事。成日都無黎默契。
作者: Lap Hui    時間: 2005-10-9 03:10 PM

下一場對波蘭變左例行公事, 英格蘭派副選既後備踢都得lu
作者: shaqkobe    時間: 2005-10-9 03:12 PM

Originally posted by Lap Hui at 2005-10-9 15:10:
下一場對波蘭變左例行公事, 英格蘭派副選既後備踢都得lu
如果係我會大部份照出正選。俾佢地再練默契又好,加強信心都好。
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-9 03:19 PM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-9 15:08:

始終英格蘭都係以年輕球員掛師,老...
但係各球員都效力世界頂級聯賽既球會,要佢地齊人練波都唔係易事。成日都無黎默契
咁巴西阿根廷咪仲慘,又唔見人冇默契,英格蘭除左碧咸之外全部都係踢英超,風格完全一樣,應該更易合拍
作者: shaqkobe    時間: 2005-10-9 03:30 PM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-9 15:19:



咁巴西阿根廷咪仲慘,又唔見人冇默契,英格蘭除左碧咸之外全部都係踢英超,風格完全一樣,應該更易合拍
但係點解釋佢地成日無默契???唔通真係教得唔好??
作者: bigfish    時間: 2005-10-9 03:51 PM

希望碧咸可以上訴成功 la
如果唔係決賽周又要停一場 la
呢兩球都係球證針對同對方插水, 累到英格蘭贏唔到兩球...
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-9 03:53 PM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-9 15:30:

但係點解釋佢地成日無默契???唔通真係教得唔好??
佢地點解成日無默契我唔敢肯定,但通常用腦踢波嘅球員例如大細哨,列基美等就比較易有默契,因為佢地會因應臨場變化而做決定,睇定先交波,而且佢地比波係比落個位到,可以牽引隊友走位,但一些靠速度快打慢dup低頭死去嘅球員就差d,佢地交波要靠慣性,即係謝拉特攞住個波,一般黎講碧咸都會企在右邊,佢會睇都唔睇就交去右邊,但如果夾得少對隊友嘅習慣都未係好熟就容易出現默契不足嘅情況
作者: shaqkobe    時間: 2005-10-9 04:13 PM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-9 15:53:

佢地點解成日無默契我唔敢肯定,但通...
咁即係英格蘭比賽上太少變化,用死一招。而球員又無充份的合作導致失誤頻頻?
作者: pc20001103b    時間: 2005-10-9 04:31 PM

蘇甘保係咪受左傷呢?
英格蘭都幾剋阿仙奴....艾殊利高爾(唔記得係咪國家隊操練)
蘇甘保唔係第一次踢完國家隊搞成咁
作者: shaqkobe    時間: 2005-10-9 05:31 PM

Originally posted by pc20001103b at 2005-10-9 16:31:
蘇甘保係咪受左傷呢?
英格蘭都幾剋阿仙奴....艾殊利高爾(唔記得係咪國家隊操練)
蘇甘保唔係第一次踢完國家隊搞成咁
係呀。傷左
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-9 05:53 PM

有冇人可以話比我聽篇文講咩= ="
作者: abcde1918    時間: 2005-10-9 06:00 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-9 05:53 PM:
有冇人可以話比我聽篇文講咩= ="
我都唔識
作者: sonyguy    時間: 2005-10-10 10:10 AM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-9 03:08 PM:

始終英格蘭都係以年輕球員掛師,老...
我覺得壓力對佢地唔係最大問題...
正如你所講...
佢地好多都係黎自英超入便既大球會...
踼歐洲賽既經驗其實已經好多...

密契唔夠呢個係一定架啦...
但其實英格蘭比起幾他有d 國家...
已經著數好多...
因為英格蘭國家隊入便...
我諗有80% 以上係在英超打緊...
其他國家仲慘...
你諗下巴西呢d...英國...意大利..西班牙..德國到到都有兩三個...

講到尾...
我覺得係英格蘭其實並唔係我地心目中咁勁既球隊...
係佢地就比左個錯覺我地...
由於佢地既聯賽攪得太好...
我地對英超球隊同佢地既球員太熟...
所以感覺上...
英格蘭國家隊就等如...車仔, 曼聯,阿仙奴, 利記 既聯隊...仲要加埋碧咸...
好似係足球小將既世青版..又有志偉...又有小志強...勁到連健威都要做後備...
所以就覺得佢地就勁到不得了~~
但實際上並唔係咁樣...
其實如果有睇佢世界杯既外圍賽...
主場比賽還可以..
作客比賽...
佢地曾經和奧地利...輸比北愛...
即使係贏果幾場...都係僅勝一球...
佢地外圍賽既對手...
最強都只係波蘭...
竟然要打到如此地步...
...
唔理個賽果...
剩係睇個比賽過程...
其實每一場比人既感覺都係危危乎...
如果有睇其他真正世界一級球隊比賽..
全場波比你既感覺係好有信心...
無得輸!!
作者: Tokyo2040    時間: 2005-10-10 11:37 AM

唔理點都好, 最緊要英格蘭入到決賽週. 雖然對英格蘭冇乜期望, 但決賽週如果冇英格蘭就總係差D嘢噤.
作者: sonyguy    時間: 2005-10-10 12:39 PM

當然啦...所以佢可以以最佳第二名成績出線我都好開心...
真係驚佢要打附加賽..
有乜e郁...個世界杯就失色好多~
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-10 04:33 PM

Originally posted by sonyguy at 2005-10-10 10:10 AM:


我覺得壓力對佢地唔係最大問題......
好同意你既講法,場場比人既感覺都係危危乎
作者: YUEN_LOUIS    時間: 2005-10-10 05:09 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-10 04:33 PM:

好同意你既講法,場場比人既感覺都係危危乎
如果只睇熱身賽,佢地真係可以同巴西一戰
但一去到d大賽,無論點排,都論論盡盡咁
英格蘭陣有d主力冇玩過世界盃,真係驚佢怯呀

[ Last edited by YUEN_LOUIS on 2005-10-10 at 05:15 PM ]
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-10 05:13 PM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-10-10 05:09 PM:

如果只睇熱身賽,佢地真係可以同巴西一戰
但一去到d大賽,無論點排,都論論盡盡咁
英格蘭陣有d主力冇玩詔世界盃,真係驚佢怯呀
羅賓遜,祖高爾,朗尼,泰利未打過世界盃.......林柏特應該打過
作者: YUEN_LOUIS    時間: 2005-10-10 05:17 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-10 05:13 PM:

羅賓遜,祖高爾,朗尼,泰利未打過世界盃.......林柏特應該打過
龍門...都唔知召唔召占士好
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-10 05:59 PM

召埋佢去囉,不過唔會用
作者: YUEN_LOUIS    時間: 2005-10-10 06:02 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-10 05:59 PM:
召埋佢去囉,不過唔會用
條友傻傻地的~
可以好勁,可以好渣
一流至九流佢做曬
佢痴起上黎,真係頂到巴西架!
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-10 07:12 PM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-10-10 17:09:

如果只睇熱身賽,佢地真係可以同巴...
上屆巴西都係得朗拿度,卡富,卡路士同李華度打過世界杯,今屆英格蘭有碧咸,A高爾,奧雲,蘇金保,李奧等踢過世界杯(上屆正選),經驗應該唔係問題,但英格蘭有一樣野就係重要關頭成日犯錯,射12碼又差不多輸梗(有冇人可以話比我知英格蘭上次國際賽射贏12碼係幾時),所以成績真係唔多睇好
作者: sonyguy    時間: 2005-10-10 11:21 PM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-10-10 05:17 PM:

龍門...都唔知召唔召占士好
梗係唔好叫佢啦...
搵佢守...
一個普普通通既遠射都可能變成入波~~
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-10 11:23 PM

Originally posted by sonyguy at 2005-10-10 11:21 PM:


梗係唔好叫佢啦...
搵佢守...
一個普普通通既遠射都可能變成入波~~
所以話佢真係可以好勁,又可以好鬼屎,佢上年對車仔鬼咁勁
作者: shaqkobe    時間: 2005-10-10 11:26 PM

太過唔穩定啦。俾著我寧願要個穩定d好,雖然未必有上身表現,不過至少俾到人地信心先。
作者: bigfish    時間: 2005-10-10 11:43 PM

Originally posted by sonyguy at 2005-10-10 10:10 AM:


我覺得壓力對佢地唔係最大問題......
我覺得佢地o既實力有目共賭, 你睇奧地利同波蘭o個d 有幾多個有碧咸佢地o既級數?
就連歐洲足協都編佢地做種籽隊啦
咁你會唔會覺得意大利同西班牙係弱隊丫?
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-11 12:43 AM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-10 23:43:

我覺得佢地o既實力有目共賭, 你睇奧...
同意,碧咸嘅級數又真係啱啱可以高過奧地利同波蘭d球員
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-11 12:49 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-11 12:43 AM:

同意,碧咸嘅級數又真係啱啱可以高過奧地利同波蘭d球員
就係果兩招,所以高過
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-11 12:56 AM

英格蘭隊波現在就好似你一心諗住鮑魚,魚翅,龍蝦煮埋一煲就一定好珍貴好好味,但點知唔記得落鹽,結果淡而無味,仲要比人鬧話你唒野
作者: shaqkobe    時間: 2005-10-11 02:07 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-11 00:56:
英格蘭隊波現在就好似你一心諗住鮑魚,魚翅,龍蝦煮埋一煲就一定好珍貴好好味,但點知唔記得落鹽,結果淡而無味,仲要比人鬧話你唒野
哈。形容得好。+2
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-11 02:17 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-11 12:56 AM:
英格蘭隊波現在就好似你一心諗住鮑魚,魚翅,龍蝦煮埋一煲就一定好珍貴好好味,但點知唔記得落鹽,結果淡而無味,仲要比人鬧話你唒野
好野
作者: sonyguy    時間: 2005-10-11 02:39 AM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-10 11:43 PM:
我覺得佢地o既實力有目共賭, 你睇奧地利同波蘭o個d 有幾多個有碧咸佢地o既級數?
就連歐洲足協都編佢地做種籽隊啦
咁你會唔會覺得意大利同西班牙係弱隊丫?
歐洲足協將英格蘭編為種籽隊...
我都唔覺得佢地係強隊...
佢只係比其他歐洲國家球隊好...

hm...如果你要將所有球隊只分為兩種...強隊同弱隊...
咁我會覺得意大利係強隊...
西班牙...英格蘭係弱隊~~

如果我分..我會分為一線強隊...二線球隊...弱隊同魚腩球隊...
一線強隊係果d 世界杯奪標大熱...好多時在國際大賽中拎好成績既球隊...
二線球隊係果d 通常都入到大賽事既決賽周...但入到去又無乜表現既球隊...
弱隊係連入決賽周都有問題既球隊...
魚腩球隊就係平時連入波都有問題既球隊...

可能係比賽多左又或者其他原因...好多國家既水平都進步左...
各國國家隊既水準都平均左...
所以...一線強隊同魚腩球隊都已經少左好多...
大部份球隊既水平都已經拉近左~
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-11 02:44 AM

你地覺唔覺得英格蘭冇左一套自己嘅足球風格,每一支隊伍無論強或弱都有自己嘅風格,巴西就個人能力融入小組戰術,意大利就防守主導,以中場控制球賽,荷蘭就進攻至上以兩翼出擊攻破對手,德國就控球在腳等機會,就算香港都有一套穩守突擊吖,但英格蘭分左右中場但又唔係打雙翼齊飛,踢小組又唔得,主攻不成又唔肯打穩守突擊,防守又唔得徹底,防中都唔用一個正宗D嘅,搞到隊波都唔知似乜,要靠一係罰球一係人地犯錯先入波,咁樣想挑戰世界杯,世少杯都未必贏到啦
作者: sonyguy    時間: 2005-10-11 02:52 AM

佢地唯一入球方法就係死球...
包括搏十二碼~~
作者: bigfish    時間: 2005-10-11 04:13 AM

Originally posted by sonyguy at 2005-10-11 02:52 AM:
佢地唯一入球方法就係死球...
包括搏十二碼~~
仲記住世界盃對阿根廷o個球 owen dive
作者: bigfish    時間: 2005-10-11 04:15 AM

Originally posted by sonyguy at 2005-10-11 02:39 AM:


歐洲足協將英格蘭編為種籽隊...
...
依你咁講, 英格蘭只不過同比利時, 巴拉圭, 美國同南斯拉夫呢d 球隊同 level 咋喎...
不過好明顯呢幾隊o既實力又及唔上英格蘭, 至少佢地冇d 好似碧咸咁家傳戶曉o既球星啦
作者: liverster    時間: 2005-10-11 12:11 PM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-11 12:56 AM:
英格蘭隊波現在就好似你一心諗住鮑魚,魚翅,龍蝦煮埋一煲就一定好珍貴好好味,但點知唔記得落鹽,結果淡而無味,仲要比人鬧話你唒野
我的意現和你有些差別.我覺得英格蘭就像一圍四五千蚊的酒席,菜是好菜,有當紅炸子雞碧咸,大紅天九翅朗尼,可以在德國漢寶,西班牙好彩一試,但要更上一層樓,放諸法國富臨,巴西新同樂等頂級食府,非加上鮑魚,熊掌等奇珍異品不可.
作者: kakeidevil    時間: 2005-10-11 12:23 PM

大家係咪肚餓得濟,當左呢度酒樓呢
作者: sonyguy    時間: 2005-10-11 12:51 PM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-11 04:15 AM:

依你咁講, 英格蘭只不過同比利時, 巴拉圭, 美國同南斯拉夫呢d 球隊同 level 咋喎...
不過好明顯呢幾隊o既實力又及唔上英格蘭, 至少佢地冇d 好似碧咸咁家傳戶曉o既球星啦
英格蘭既實力高過佢地...我都認同...
但係唔係好明顯...我有少少保留...(除左美國外啦)
在我心目中...都係屬於二線球隊...
咁二線球隊中都有分二線頭同二線尾既~

佢地係無好似碧咸咁家傳戶曉既球星...
主要原因係佢地當地既聯賽班marketing無英超果班咁好囉...
=)
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-11 01:04 PM

Originally posted by liverster at 2005-10-11 12:11:


我的意現和你有些差別.我覺得英格...
我意思係英格蘭班球星出名,但夾埋一齊就打唔出佢地嘅實力,因為艾歷臣都冇一套正式戰術,仲有你講果d'星'應該攞去荷里活比較,而唔係同足球員比較,越聽你講就越懷疑你係睇'波'定睇'星'
作者: bigfish    時間: 2005-10-11 02:31 PM

Originally posted by sonyguy at 2005-10-11 12:51 PM:


英格蘭既實力高過佢地...我都認同...
我明你o既 point
不過如果只計國際大舞台, 好似世界盃, 歐聯, 南美自由盃, 亞冠聯等等, 表現優秀o既就係碧咸, 林柏特, 朗尼o個d, 而有表現o既比利時, 巴拉圭或者南斯拉夫真係比較少囉
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-11 02:42 PM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-11 14:31:

我明你o既 point
不過如果只計國際...
依家講緊英格蘭係咪一線強隊,個別球員踢得好唔代表球隊好,經常都會出現某一兩個球員表現好但由於球隊失衡,引致攻不銳,守不穩,你睇皇馬上季施丹表現搶鏡,但皇馬一樣成日輸波,球隊強唔強在於整體,碧咸, 林柏特, 朗尼歐冠杯踢得好唔代表係英格蘭都踢得好,如果只計一兩屆表現,咁現今歐洲最強球隊係希臘




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0