Originally posted by giggschan999 at 2005-12-20 21:17:) s$ A+ l# O% c! M+ F: Q
1呀....................~~~ * O0 D4 ]: \% o2 a& \靚好多/\/\
; k' H7 U6 ?# V" e5 C- u J3 e* D
: q- F7 s4 i, l: N
I can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通 ' ?9 V- F8 w. z& _" U2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF...5 }; j/ g4 J @0 t
3 w2 H1 ~/ F6 Z- Q; t1 c. DSecond one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet... 5 A( v; s+ b1 w/ U/ i 9 j' d9 |/ s7 X x* A) B 6 k `! `% f& |$ ~( Above are personal perspective)作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-12-23 03:34 PM
睇投票咪知囉~作者: YingTung 時間: 2005-12-23 05:07 PM
平心而論...兩個都麻麻地1 ]" A' g- F! `; V! K+ J. H8 F
第一個的確太孩子氣..完全係中學生設計水平feel..., _" V/ b3 p- ~0 Z5 P1 c
第二個..設計技巧上高過第一個,做左o的Inner Grow~~但整體俾人感覺係怪..同埋唔靚.. & |" \1 ?9 R6 ?" y- esorry...