<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]
返回列表 回復 發帖
for a couple:
& ?5 K) q0 |$ \0 Z# }: V# J  b7 ~
' E) x* V& x& Y# E* ^. |for my view, i agree concubinage b4 getting married
# Q* X6 a/ k6 z5 ^+ \* Vbecause u can know much more about her/his daily life and comportment(also for them to know these about u), living together, nothing can be suppressed so easily% r: o5 u$ a1 y6 R5 ?5 q
so that u can know much more about she/he is suitable for u or not( Z2 b( s: L* r8 L0 Q  f
avoiding divorse which will come out much more serious and trouble problems!!!
& s7 q$ `6 Y9 }2 A. ]8 r" O) `: o( A9 Z. P, l* e. T( y! s/ j# \! ?
after comparing with the moral and rational analysis, i think actuality is much more important!!!
0 T1 H0 M2 z) R0 D) C. V3 B! E$ K1 d* v& C+ g- b1 I
however for fds, i think no, i have tried to live with a guy at hall, S5 T2 v6 F8 p( P  S
living together with fds really a trouble, because must need to stand for other bad point. ~% {7 G& d4 X. [' k
easily getting worse for yr relationship8 J& [8 u$ ~; E! B- Y

* A8 U; S9 L$ P[ Last edited by jason williams on 2005-5-27 at 11:14 PM ]
jason
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。