<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]
返回列表 回復 發帖
for a couple:8 v- ]' B" M& |! Y9 ?9 k
7 p3 Q; G" T5 N7 ]
for my view, i agree concubinage b4 getting married
' _$ i7 \1 F6 E3 v" J0 B8 Obecause u can know much more about her/his daily life and comportment(also for them to know these about u), living together, nothing can be suppressed so easily
* |0 x$ t2 C) a( b* _so that u can know much more about she/he is suitable for u or not0 u/ ~( `( Q! s" H. f( N! z
avoiding divorse which will come out much more serious and trouble problems!!!" W* G$ `0 Z9 d) n' N" P* Y% Z
; L$ L' a( i% @. ^9 ~5 H% w
after comparing with the moral and rational analysis, i think actuality is much more important!!!
8 h1 ?8 R1 F& h, f- Q( j8 }2 z: t+ Y& S  A- t" k- s
however for fds, i think no, i have tried to live with a guy at hall
+ ?5 k1 s0 A7 `9 L+ wliving together with fds really a trouble, because must need to stand for other bad point2 |; G$ t; _, l, `
easily getting worse for yr relationship2 s; Z  i8 |8 h: B, p  I( j2 `

# U! t# D+ s- ~0 }7 d- x, `2 h[ Last edited by jason williams on 2005-5-27 at 11:14 PM ]
jason
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。