<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]
返回列表 回復 發帖
for a couple:0 ?4 y8 d' t- q4 ?5 P1 S
8 ?5 A, Y3 X0 F* R
for my view, i agree concubinage b4 getting married& G& ^0 v+ G6 M& g
because u can know much more about her/his daily life and comportment(also for them to know these about u), living together, nothing can be suppressed so easily5 Z8 \4 i) H" I% f8 i  R: @0 s
so that u can know much more about she/he is suitable for u or not! ?0 t+ s; Q4 F
avoiding divorse which will come out much more serious and trouble problems!!!1 h, Q0 i3 A8 k3 ^8 O6 m1 e
' c  @  u" ?' V' i9 ^
after comparing with the moral and rational analysis, i think actuality is much more important!!!; {" r$ q, a* G3 e" {  |6 I
, m, r; w& F4 l1 y/ }
however for fds, i think no, i have tried to live with a guy at hall
) h2 t6 I! e. p5 ^living together with fds really a trouble, because must need to stand for other bad point
3 G+ g. p2 P+ c9 x" jeasily getting worse for yr relationship" f. H( I  u% n6 l& O/ ]7 m6 G
* q/ N8 Z- A8 i8 L6 Z5 i0 C
[ Last edited by jason williams on 2005-5-27 at 11:14 PM ]
jason
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。