mttfpuk

U both are quite correct...but can I add one new points?

Pistons play team defence well in whole game, and one thing is,

O'neal and Kobe has 5th foul already, and Malone injure (although

not series), if U are phil...U will try to win the game and dun want

go into OT (of coz no body know Kobe and O'neal will so big in OT at

that, Brown will know what Phil want, if just

defence 2 pts only, there still a risk to loss the game, but if they

still play balance team defence, they can D 2 pts of coz, and lower

the chance of 3 pts (U think in one 3 pts in last 2.1 sec is easy ka).

and they will think they can get advantage in OT becoz of 5 foul and

Malone's injure. Base on the interview of Kobe after the game, Kobe

said the run for the last 2.1 sec is set for O'neal...but he can;t do

it..under no choice situation, he need take the shoot....So...I think

what pistons do is quite correct, but loss just because O'neal and

Kobe do what a superstar should do in the OT.

anyway...it's a great game in the past few final series. and I think in

the pistons home game, Laker will play more defence against

pistons. The starting point is give up Payton....he is so rubbish.

if I say something wrong...plx forgive me  

mttfpuk

Pistons 既防守真係太勁, 贏 game 3 係好應該既
But 點解 Lakers 會 loss 20 pts 同 just get 68 pts total lei?
我諗有 2 reasons:
1. Psitons 既 team defence 好快, beside cut 哂 Lakers 既 passing line, double team 同 switch defence 都做得好好, Kobe 係 1st have 係掂唔到 ball. pass 到比 O'neal 既 ball also very limit. it make other bench player shoot 左好多唔應該既 ball. 有時 although coz double team 走左一個 lakers player, 佢地 still 可以好快咁 form 返一個好好既防守 postion. 我睇 NBA 咁多 years (from 1987/88), 未見過有 one team 係可以打 defence 打得咁好. 仲要係場場都 keep 到 high standard 既 defence, 一 D 都唔易. 佩服 佩服.

2. Lakers 唔單進攻唔順, 防守都唔得, 佢地唔係冇技術, 佢地係唔夠快, Billups, Hamilton 同 Prince 太快, even Kobe 都守唔到 Billups.  同 O'neal and Malone is too slow. Pistons 好多時 use Bigben 同 Billups 係 3 pts area 打 pick and roll, 令到 Malone or O'neal 走出去, becoz Billups 太快, After pick, 佢地 (C and PF) block 到 Billups 又走唔返去守 bigben or R. Wallace. it make lakers  既防守 structure broke 哂, pistons 做左好多 open shoot 同 easy lay up. if 唔 block Billups lei, 佢又可以 shoot 3 pts or 好快咁 get inside. 有一個時候 Lakers 出 Kobe, Fishers, Walton, Medvedenko 同 Cook 去打, lei 個 form 係快好多同真係守到 pistons 一陣, but 進攻又唔夠力, 最候 D pts 一樣, 你入唔到時, 我又入唔到. 係一場攻唔夠力, 守唔夠快既 game, 又點可以唔 loss 20 pts lei.

Lei 次 Lakers 真係大鑊, if 下場 D 進攻都係咁都幾 dangerous, 我諗 Lakers 係進攻時 D ball 要 pass 得快 D, break Pistons 既 double team 同 defence structure, 咁 sin 可以 make 多 D open shoot 同 多 D space for O'neal in the middle. 要知 speed 係冇得 improve 既同 pistons 既進攻都係 80s pts 咁, if 進攻做好 D 應該都仲有得打 gei.

mttfpuk

[quotefrom="kk33"]要活塞連續三場作客敗陣係好難(活塞係第二場作客湖人輸?)所以就算要到湖人主場打決賽,贏面始終較高~~
^.^

大家 still think 活塞既  performance 仲有主客分咩  :twisted:

mttfpuk

見到 Malone 既樣, 有 D 唔想講 lei 場 ball .

Lakers 成場 ball 有 35 個 foul, 有 1/2 係唔知做乜 foul..., 個 ref. 都唔知做乜.... 係....pistons 係打得好好, 不過都唔一定贏到場 ball, Lakers 係 loss 比 ref.
仲有 Kobe 傻左, O'neal 上哂力都唔比佢打, 係要自己死去, shoot 左好多唔應該既 ball. 其實 Laker lei 場好 successful 咁守到 pistons 既 pick and roll, Billups D 3分都唔係好掂, 係打個 R.Wallace. if 唔係有咁多 foul shoot 比 Pistons, Lakers 應該可以贏 10 分. D foul 搞笑到 Phil Jackson 都忍唔住要complain..

不過o個 2 個 Wallace 打得好好, Bigben 守 O'neal 守得好勁, 要 pass 個 ball 比 O'neal 一 D 都唔易, + 上 R.Wallace 既協防, O'neal 都有 36 分真係好勁, if 冇 Bigben 既防守, O'neal 一定唔只 lei 個分.
R.Wallace mature 左好多, 冇 foul trouble, 冇 T foul, 多左 stable 既 performance, 比係 portland 個時好好多, 睇左佢咁耐, 未見過佢咁乖 :blink:

e 家 Lakers already loss 1-3, 下場會唔會有 surprise lei? 好睇 Kobe 可唔可以 play as a team 同可唔可以守到 Pistons 既 pick and roll. if 唔得, Malone 既 dream 就要等 sleep sin 可以完成 la....