英超曼聯vs車路士告知了一件事

dawander3r

英超曼聯3比0大敗車路士告知了一件事
車路士=垃圾

請唔好誤會，我其實係車仔fans，不過係摩帥在位之時，因早知車仔有此結果
油王正如香港D老細一樣，請完人番嚟又要壓倒人地專業意見，得閒插隻手埋嚟搞亂檔
第一個要換就係要換佢，更何況佢都無水咯，無Q用
大菲根本就唔識調兵遣將
淨係等球員有好發揮就死得啦
你識點佢地，佢地咪識發揮囉
不過根本就係之前收購了唔啱隊波嘅人番來，搞亂了，阻礙發揮，唔係明氣大就得嘅，最緊要係唔好因喜好而用人
波可以輸，不過作為兩隊大球會嘅對決，3比0嘅結果係唔可以接受。
就等同俾個外行人楂旗一樣
隊波嘅成績係靠球員打番來，同個教練無關，今季都係主要靠Anelka入波喳嘛，佢唔入，隊波同大菲就無辦法，以前摩帥點都會諗D新野睇下work唔work
以前前面唔入，就會有中場幫拖入番，宜家無咗支歌仔唱
宜家最緊要搵個林伯嘅代替品，輔助佢又好sub佢都好。
進攻板斧太寡喇
好過又買前鋒，造就唔到攻勢一樣無用，根本唔關前鋒事
大佬，唔好成日諗住單天保至尊，你仲有成對波腳喺度架

[ 本帖最後由 brightlee 於 2009-1-12 03:22 PM 編輯 ]

dawander3r

thank you everybody
i have the same opinions as u guys
first, i always think Scolari really sucks, i just don't understand why there r so many people have bigger names than their actual skills, u can easily see if they got skills or not from just a few matches, a good coach has quite some strategy on hand and they are capable of making tactics right away for the time being when the team is not doing well enough, for useless coaches like this guy, he has no tricks at all
second, i believe they really need a left wing, Malouda is fair to do the job, but they still need alternative wings
the previous left wingers Robben & Duff really saved the team for so many times when the strikers in the front couldn't score
i felt so disappointed when they sold Duff away, he was the 4 key players (Lampard, Duff, Terry, Cudicini) made Chelsea a good team before Abrahimovich acquired the team, he was definitely a solid sub for Robben
also, the mids in the center r slow, that's no doubt, at least Lampard can still do the job well by running more as we can see in the previous years, Ballack was really a bad trade, he doesn't fit to the team, i also don't think he fits to the British style, in addition, the team had tons of good DM back then
finally, in respond of  自由神, the reason for their failure was totally because of the management, u never see owners intercept managers' decisions in great clubs, Chelsea started to fail since then, especially it became obvious after Schevchenko's arrival
Mourinho got skill because he always prove that by never using star players and still able to win the cups, that's his theory
all the Chelsea players weren't star players before they became famous under Mourinho's coaching
now, the result is obvious when Mourinho is away while the team remains the same, the team's performance is weak when u c it as a whole, anyways, they are weak even if u judge by individual's performance
they use manager instead of coach start to make me feel it's accurate to use such term, look at Ferguson, the success of Man Utd. partially comes from his managing skill
he always knows who to buy, he always buys the right players, and he's also good at developing young talents
he also knows how to adjust to various situations
although i don't really like him, his success is definitely obvious
anyways, i think the main problem of the team is definitely located in the mid field regardless what exactly the problem is
it must be there
like, if u can't set up plays, its definitely reducing the scoring opportunities for the strikers up front, while you are causing no threat to the opponent, u will start under massive attacks and which makes sense leading to a high possibility of being scored no matter how good the defenders are, as a conclusion, the midfield line is the spirit of the team, u can tell they are not performing well when u c the team plays bad without spirit

dawander3r

原帖由 feuosma 於 2009-1-13 12:08 AM 發表


英超曼聯3比0大敗車路士告知了一件事

利記=垃圾

(但不得不承認人地根基好，一季兩季成績唔好
好快就可以重上正軌....)

賢弟你都仲好....係車迷....我呢個十幾廿年既利迷....諗住今年終於等到啦......點知......:y ...

i think their main problem is always that they don't know how to buy people
look at the team now, they start playing well by acquiring some right choices such as Torres, but then when u look at the team as a whole, some of the starting lineups do not seem to match up, n their bench depth is weak
if they can get 2-3 more good players, i m sure they will have a better record
anyways, there's also another common error i believe, once they have some star players performing well, their style will start relying on these players only, so when these key players' condition is bad, they will not know how to react
they r very lazy and short-sighted, they should always practice more attacking styles for various situations, also they need contingency plans because players' conditions are always up and down like roller coaster, i guess they never learn about that even at the year of 2009 already
anyways, i ain't Chelsea's fans anymore
my heart goes to Barcelona now, lol
actually, Man Utd really plays good this season too
they have quite some good team chemistry for all the players, everyone supports each other
rather than Barcelona relies on Messi's goals
so this season, i really admire Man U & Barcelona
i just don't understand y they don't go acquire the opposite wing from each other
Messi + C7 = Conquering the world
each one draws up 3 players to defend, half of the team is gone by just guarding these 2 players, and they locate at both sides, so it just makes ya defending players die running

dawander3r

原帖由 feuosma 於 2009-1-13 12:44 AM 發表


說得好.....唔訓都要回一回....

冇錯...就係短視....不過呢個唔可以怪曬賓帥....

最深層既問題係.....費sir帶左廿幾年.....佢會知道隊波晌聯賽落後緊時應該要點做...同可以點做.....

領先緊時應該要點做...同可 ...

wanna make a bit of explanation
if u analyze the factors u mention between Ferguson & Mourinho on another perspective, Ferguson has the advantage leading to his success than Mourinho
first, his management is not being affected by the board, he has the absolutely authority (Mourinho has already complained that Abrahimovich shouldn't have involved operation such as trading because he's the coach who knows who to buy for fitting his tactics)
second, Ferguson has the respect from the players because he's been in this industry and this club for so many years, in addition, the players are under his instruction since they were young, which gives Ferguson to obtain the absolute loyalty from the players
third, again, as Ferguson has been in the team for all his lifelong, of course he knows better how to adjust according to situation
Mourinho shows me the respect as only a skillful person can achieve success no matter where he is
compares to Mourinho's repositioning of Stankovic and formation of Inter now and how Scolari adjusts for Chelsea, the result is obvious on who got skills on coaching
another correction is that Mourinho always emphasizes not to use Star players, because its high odd leading to troubles, thats what he complained when Abrahimovich was planning to acquire Schevchenko, and he was right on predicting the result

dawander3r

原帖由 filter-052fans 於 2009-1-13 11:09 AM 發表


如果係球壇之上, 大菲史高拉利都唔算係大人物既, 真係唔知咩人先算....

車迷中晒摩連奴毒, 你地既偶像, 除左浮誇吸引傳媒既功力外, 執教成績絕對比唔上大菲...

史高拉利帶金美奧同彭美拉斯都攞過巴西聯 ...

yes, Mourinho is being an idol for many people because apparently he proves what he got, for all the craps he say is already proven that his intention was to shoulder off the pressure of the players from the medias which highly make an impact to their condition (mentally leads to physically), and which has been proven successful, and that's one of the reasons he has earned the respect from the players by that
another thing is that Mourinho has way shorter coaching years than Scolari as u say, in addition, he also brought FC Porto and Chelsea won w/o star players, players from Chelsea weren't star players until they won the cup, he's the one making them to become star players man, Duff, Lampard, Terry, and Cudicini were performing so well before the arrival of Abrahimovich and Mourinho, and that's the time I started to pay attention to Chelsea

for the recent World Cup, c'mon, let me tell u this, maybe many of u wouldn't believe me, go to youtube and take a look of how these brazilian players play in those indoor league on their spare times, u should recognize there's a huge gap between their individual skills and the european teams, some of the players participated in those indoor league are also professional players from europe
u still start to doubt the result of the World Cup
the fact is, money is larger than the pride they get from winning the World Cup for their current generation because the prize they get from winning the World Cup is too small compares to what they would get from losing the cup, u know what i intend to mean right?
the value is different when u r in a well developed country and a developing country

anyways, when did u see a coach being an idol for so many people? think about why man
also, remember this, he was just a school teacher, haha....
if u can bring a team to win a cup, u will also be praised for many people, will u still think the one who praise u r all idiots and erase all the efforts u contribute yourself?

[ 本帖最後由 dawander3r 於 2009-1-14 08:53 AM 編輯 ]

dawander3r

原帖由 fderek 於 2009-1-14 11:53 PM 發表
一場球賽輸了就把所有事都怪在領隊身上看來不太合理
呢場3比0我覺得根本同領隊無關
反而是車仔後防真係差左好多既問題
固中原故實在是泰利已經走下坡, 第一個入球那麼低
其實他是有足夠時間看清楚衝出來頂走...
第二 ...

apparently, we are not judging by 1 match only, we are judging him by all the results till now so far
again, it's ok to lose, 1-0, 2-0, makes sense, but 3-0....that's not acceptable
the most important factor to judge a player's true value is whether the player can keep a stable solid performance, which is depends on how he manages his condition
every player has his up and down, this is something a coach also have to deal with, and that's why Mourinho talked so much craps before the match, as u know, the coach from rival teams usually like to insult some of the players for affecting their condition, psychological attack man
and such scenarios are actually very common, a good coach should always be prepared to solve the crisis when it arises
that is why we also praised Ferguson for doing his job well

[ 本帖最後由 dawander3r 於 2009-1-15 12:56 AM 編輯 ]