johnwu

Originally posted by happylion99 at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
* w3 |! g# |$ M4 ]2 J6 V+ e" @" J5 ]0 r* `! m
1 H( u7 `$ c' s% K% }! q5 ?- {
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打...

6 m6 v% o$ k0 E, d0 @0 W/ Z9 j8 f5 F1 d
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.* l, P. c- n  G0 F/ s1 o! b
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu

hello vivi, you beat me to it

johnwu

刑事罪:
# \) c$ A% q4 q% {- E0 L# L  u告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)
7 A, v) p  J8 l  r$ G/ S6 ?3 k0 o0 L- X2 p! K
民事訴訟:, j/ R; U# D9 k
告人個條友 =you

johnwu

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:! O) E/ E! f8 ~# z. d/ r
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

4 I$ `& V2 e& g! `* d2 F
% b$ ^5 Z) r4 k5 ?7 d" ANot always... like this case.. ! m3 C; q/ z$ m! s, z3 Y9 B9 s
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

johnwu

Originally posted by timho1027 at 2005-6-15 05:19 AM:9 ]1 y9 B: F4 n2 _6 A' Y  k$ h
我想聽大家自己的觀點9 i! f  y; _' Q4 e  f5 q
如果你喜歡
/ @+ F7 X2 E& Q, u9 _您可以加入討論
8 u  k8 i+ t! P5 [; X7 z; F5 ^2 \但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
( E7 K/ i7 g" d已經代表自己的觀點
; O+ A  Z8 z: a4 G/ @$ M您沒有需要繼續吠& z& w: `$ L/ C5 e: ]( ~
THE END

# o2 `- Q$ _* ^7 f5 a# s1 O# G( |2 G) \+ l. h4 V3 p  ^- L+ z7 T
Be careful of your wording...
# C, T0 {; _$ ~6 ^& _- Y