johnwu

Originally posted by happylion99 at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:* O: r7 _8 P% F5 X, R2 S+ c

+ D5 l$ H1 J* N
; m! J7 O: i! n! V除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打...

, F$ o: ~/ g$ F* A& n0 U( R, K1 K5 s& K

) Y/ Q: l# W" N& }This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.2 R/ F( l8 p) i) r( y
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu

hello vivi, you beat me to it

johnwu

刑事罪:
# ^* q; Q/ x) q5 ~/ J) B' Q, e6 ~告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)
6 O6 U6 I9 f$ }, g/ B7 F2 d: a/ b
4 ~0 o( D% Z) b0 n. L民事訴訟:( m% |6 z3 I) v0 e/ V) }
告人個條友 =you

johnwu

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:
8 B5 |1 _  R- q: a0 X; {仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

6 L2 v, H2 m- U. p& w5 ~
5 X' m0 {/ h$ {' R+ s( G
Not always... like this case.. 8 }+ _3 E5 L( _3 z5 A
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

johnwu

Originally posted by timho1027 at 2005-6-15 05:19 AM:+ P4 g7 F3 l* x6 @
我想聽大家自己的觀點
8 j6 b+ E$ h" [2 [2 f1 y/ _% C$ l如果你喜歡5 a; s7 l- O& C  U' p5 j
您可以加入討論0 c  g; F1 |+ G: a$ c6 J
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
* [$ g; n# H1 y已經代表自己的觀點
! b  ^0 L% D! F# h% }您沒有需要繼續吠
8 h/ g% W! e9 M# z4 kTHE END

0 {& y9 ]; E- X( A0 o3 K/ w1 m  V( O
% F* I4 ~4 J" a5 [3 g6 Z  H# }- gBe careful of your wording...
3 g' F/ e! C- c! ]. z9 D