stereo

Originally posted by brightman at 2006-4-23 12:03 AM:

兩間球會係世仇黎

大家睇完依段歷史就明點解熱刺咁唔鐘意阿仙奴。
http://www.emiratesstadium.info/serv01.htm

stereo

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2006-4-22 11:54 PM:
熱刺為左歐聯真系殺人放火都可能會做~!
先公開話阿仙奴win左歐聯而令佢地冇份踼會用法律去告足協及阿仙奴,明搞大件事,而家又整單咁既野出黎,恨踼歐聯可理解,但不扎手段去搶個席位不可寬恕,身為英倫球會見到同國兼同市球會扲到歐聯冠軍應該開心low~!唔開心都唔好掃人興ㄚ.........

若然其他英倫球會和球迷見到一隊全外援既阿仙奴win左歐聯，真係唔知開唔心開心得落。

stereo

小弟全場都好留心睇，事發時見到球證有埋去更進件事；但球証無表示吹停比賽，熱刺既卡域克同戴維斯看一下事發地點同見球証無吹停於是繼續進攻，而係直播中鏡頭一轉影到伊保爾想起返身；但佢見到熱刺進攻緊之後又坐番低。到之後入左波，從新開波個一刻佢已經無事係場上面比賽了。

事情始末就係咁，有錯請各大佬指點更正。

stereo

Originally posted by brightman at 2006-4-23 12:36 AM:

雲加持相反意見

Wenger clearl...

在場上比賽的卡域克賽後訪問
Carrick told Sky Sports: "To be honest I just thought he fell over, I didn't realise the guy was injured. We don't like scoring goals like that but it's happened and we can't change it.

"We aren't cheats that's for sure, but I thought the guy just fell down and if he was injured I'd have put the ball out but that's the way it goes I suppose."

When asked if Spurs are now in pole position for fourth, Carrick added: "There's still games to play and points to play for. We've put ourselves in a good position. We've played well first half and the second half they've put us under a lot of pressure and I'm satisfied with a draw."

stereo

Originally posted by brightlee at 2006-4-23 04:57 PM:


I watched the game too
I think the whole incident, I would blame Martin Jol, the manager of Spurs
Yes, Henry and Eboub were colladed together.
Then Michael Carrick got the ball and stood on the sideline for 3 seconds.
Martin Jol yelled him to play on
Then he clicked the ball to someone, then passed to Eagar Davids.
Davids setup the ball to Robbie Keane to score a goal

I won't blame Eagar Davids and Robbie Keane
They did their jobs.....

That's no doubt for an offensive team.

You could see why Arsene Wenger yelled Martin Jol after that incident.
and he just left the field after the game.........

That's stupid for Martin Jol to change the atmosphere in really bad conditions.......

Lucky that's no any Worst incident at the end

Think about in NBA, Detroit and Indian are playing carefully now if they are playing together......
Sometimes, yes, that's OK to be enemies from history.
But that's weird to put oil into water.....

幾年前, 雲加對錫非聯賽後訪問
Wenger: "they can not accuse of being unfair, i wouldnt do that if it was on the other side"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/audi ... 49_sport_wenger.ram

雲加是否自打嘴巴?

[ Last edited by stereo on 2006-4-24 at 01:30 PM ]

stereo

其實英國那邊對這件事談論不多，當日的電視評述員認為熱刺的做法正確，阿倫漢臣（前利物浦中堅）則呼籲雲加對之前向祖爾的批評道歉，輿論普遍傾向熱刺。

係知名網站ESPN Soccernet 4萬4千多人既投票結果當中有63%人都係話熱刺無錯，只得37%人選熱刺係錯。http://soccernet.espn.go.com/index?cc=4716

另外睇埋球証 Steve Bennett 同 Arsenal chairman Peter Hill-Wood 既發言，我諗依件事都無謂爭論落去；應該告一段落。

The referee Steve Bennett, said: "Two Arsenal players went into each other and I assessed the situation. No one was in any danger. There was no head injury, so therefore the game could go on. It's as simple as that." (The People)

Arsenal chairman Peter Hill-Wood admitted: "I didn't feel that Tottenham did anything wrong. He (Carrick) saw the collision (between two Arsenal players off the ball) and as far as I could tell, Davids was looking ahead, down the wing." (Daily Telegraph)