Gretzky

Originally posted by research2005010 at 2005-10-31 06:00 PM:
你咁樣同宣傳人地個壇有甚麼分別 ?

I agree with you!

For the record, this forum should be free for all to express their view points in matters of religious faith. So comes the tolerance level in 'promoting' the beliefs.The line should be drawn by the moderator of this particular sub-forum (other sub-forum moderators need to exercise collective responsibility when participating) and while no regularotry remarks are clear enough to illustrate the principles, members need to trust the moderators as a rule of thumb on crashes of opinion. This is a basic etiquette of a cyber community.

Nowadays most cyber identities are either a) the extension of the actual personality or b) the supressed super-ego (using Freud's term). On a forum like this crashes are not uncommon especially in the current affairs and spirituality sub-forums. I may have my ideas towards a particular relgious faith (isn't that true for EVERYONE here?). Chances are the religious faiths we have the strongest emotional responses is either the one we embrace wholeheartedly or the one we have much animosity against. We are who we are intrnisically and it is not fair to stereotype others (this is to you bright and other Christian friends who are eager in evangelism),however hard this is.

EF is not a religious cyber community. We can not expect anyone to abide to any religious dogmas here. EF is also not a place for hard selling of any sort. This maybe sound troublesome for members who are actively involved with their inclusive religious faith (i.e., Zen Buddhism, the Evangelical branch of Protestant Christianity, some animistic beliefs). I don't think this is our marketing bulletin board, nor shall this forum ever be dominated by any sort of beliefs.

Religion is a matter of life experience. We live in a postmodern world and hurting others' feelings is the cardinal sin. If anyone's faith is important to him/her, maybe showing it through his/her authentic journey of life speak way louder than puddling through the uncertainities of the cyber world.

Let's take this less personal and move on. If you ask my opinion, I think Bright needs to make an apology to our friend research2005010 here. But it is not my postion to impose anything here.

To this I renounce:
a) promotions of any sort of religious thoughts (even boarder line threads) as there are others who do not concur with postors' thoughts.
b) threads on topics and replies by members that viciously attack any beliefs.
c) Thought-less comments on religious matter by members and their stubbornness to admit damages to the atmosphere of the forum as well as their unwillingness to stop the futile arguments.

Here I stand.
Gretzky

Gretzky

Push back to the top for notification purposes.