段云

唔俾
席位就係得咁多，有乜理由要人地俾多一個位你？
仲有，補充一點，而家講緊話同另一隊踢附加賽我都反對
席位點可以讓黎讓去？

段云

Originally posted by VictorTan at 2005-5-27 02:54 PM:



IF UEFA ，ENG FA & WALES FA agree,than你自己写信去反到你够。

我唔會去反對到夠
我只會對UEFA同兩國足總表示失望，既然自己定左規則，為什麼又要自己打破佢。

段云

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-5-27 09:40 PM:

咁攞冠軍黎做咩???答下我

攞冠軍為左名同利

名譽:貴為歐州頂級賽事既冠軍，證明利物浦既實力。
利益:巨額冠軍獎金，加上晉級路途上既門票收益同獎金。

咁你又認為攞冠軍為左乜？
唔會係為左攞下屈歐聯既一個小小既參賽資格掛？

段云

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-5-27 11:38 PM:

你所講既的確係所有球隊想要既,但係利記打生打死都係想要下年個參賽資格

咁我覺得只能怪佢地係聯賽踢得麻麻
利物浦只要係聯賽再俾多少少心機，踢多一兩場對Ａ米果１０幾分鐘既好波
我相信佢地一早有果個歐聯參賽資格。

段云

都唔算奇怪啦
今年衛冕果隊波圖都踢到不知所謂
唔係車仔放水差d連十六強都入唔到。
十六強即刻俾國米送佢返葡萄牙

段云

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-5-28 12:01 AM:

最緊要係有得打~唔好話16強啦,32強都唔比人打,係唔係有d怪呢,身為冠軍球隊竟然冇得踢= ="

波圖有得打因為同時亦係上年葡超冠軍。

段云

剛剛上網睇一睇，下載左UEFA既規則。
發現左D野，同大家分享
係規則入面既1.03係咁講既
1.03 At the request of the national association concerned, the UEFA Champions
League title-holders may be entered for this competition, as an additional
representative of that association, if they have not qualified for the UEFA
Champions League via the top domestic league championship. If, in such a
case, the title-holders come from an association entitled to enter four teams
for the UEFA Champions League, the fourth-placed club in the top domestic
league championship has to be entered for the UEFA Cup
照規則睇，
咁利物浦係應該有得打歐冠既
而愛華頓只能打歐協。
所以，矛頭應該指向英國足總，唔係UEFA
因為好似係英國足總開聲話俾愛華頓打歐冠。
應該係罵英國足總點解俾個席位愛華頓，而唔好再罵UEFA點解唔俾多一個席位利物浦

[ Last edited by 段云 on 2005-5-28 at 12:22 AM ]