|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.7 z; l9 ]7 C5 J9 T/ e6 f5 A
! w7 A" {! _9 p
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
5 e, X2 Q- [! H0 ?
: p t4 r% Q: K! O. lIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,! [4 f& J: A; `% S7 N9 W' r
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
" o9 B/ v% a+ @# p# _$ |" F7 p; C1 C k# o4 d* V- h6 S
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險, ^# ]( _3 D* {
3 R, d C. k! y6 k. L; n/ t
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, ( j* b- f$ U/ f) J& |# U
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
