|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.
0 z& F/ B7 a. F3 e+ c- d# P2 |6 O$ o$ w! q8 W
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
5 N8 O: P# S) O+ d6 J; y! @2 O( @/ W U
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
. C4 Z4 o$ s* P* J( cand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
9 t' z( _; z/ N! T3 @7 E, P
# ^% \) d( N' A" L* q4 ?so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
y5 O! }+ f( N J! K* j- ^! H* \; W, R v7 F6 l
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
5 @/ w9 F9 R* Mat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
