|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.
( l4 s! v) w" a: @0 s
6 t t4 w3 }$ paccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
8 p0 f- i/ N. X# L; S8 k) `4 L; n2 h" ?
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
5 l) I! b4 l" S! z, pand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him. g) e4 ?" Z5 o3 X9 l3 `
) }8 ]) W0 w( z3 H) G! ~$ a
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
" k% z+ U% }6 Q4 ?
: K/ R" {+ ]& L. U" Q* Ain 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
# t$ m$ q6 d+ x6 T% {at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
