 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.# p" I4 m( l2 i4 O
0 C4 |0 b3 I# v. A+ V
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
! ~ N! I; C/ M. E% V
) T; \" ~5 R$ t4 W- j$ e3 a+ sIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
/ ]' r6 l+ G6 N* xand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.) b; A: ~4 _0 B, t
* Q+ ]+ W" Y" Rso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
" G* `5 {& Q* Q6 ~6 K/ C
' h! T6 r* C* ^& Z6 F, @; s% {in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
; w& h& j$ T& q [at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|