|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.; Y' B# C6 ~9 z' n8 r
( d( ] @1 d$ b) }according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.# i" V# y* c* U6 Q, X8 I$ {
# `: ]1 S) m" b- r3 l0 B8 ^In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,/ e; W. Q# B/ z& {1 M
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.2 E; w" Z7 n N7 O
) z) Q) `0 o" ?0 K
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險$ q% X4 w7 p: s4 Y
3 O6 N: g+ v( e2 D, C, `* Tin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
* F1 r- N- N( S) Tat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
