LMQ

即係叫d人掉哂d mp3機同md機佢% U% u5 T( [. ?9 G. B+ m: |
因為dum親歌落去就係侵犯版權
. r7 r) ?- A% b8 t- m% e% u) u% P) W" M以後個個淨係聽disman搞掂~

LMQ

Originally posted by 167169 at 2005-5-31 10:28 AM:# g" n# h9 q( V; B- {* c% _8 K
所以依家攪網上download mp3,如你比錢後download咪OK law9 f0 n1 y4 Y; j& l3 h; b
- O- t" f# D* f+ U" c) k( R$ E
(其實一早就要攪,全世界都用mp3,但就冇合法渠道download)

! c. ]. Q) S3 i2 d0 ^2 T
但係係唔係大部份人都係咁做就係一個問題..

LMQ

Originally posted by yuripenny at 2005-5-31 06:44 PM:/ G" ^. S4 g" R- V. E; x
咁就好正啦...
6 Z# a. y1 c' b8 F咁直係話個個出街攞住...

$ v6 e; s8 G1 t所以我先唔明1 ]% x' W- T" k7 A; l
咁d公司仲出d mp3機黎做乜
7 ?7 n* X7 q% |$ o- ?# _棧俾政府又係度話助長複製風氣..

LMQ

Originally posted by karenmoe at 2005-6-1 02:03 AM:
" V( s" w% d! e# Y5 G# S這是兩回事，
1 c& V2 H6 ?, a: A5 y2 WMP3製造商可以說MP3的用途是收錄自製音樂而不是有版權的音樂，$ z8 @( P2 X+ I
正如菜刀和車子一樣，用家犯法是用家本身的責任，; ]8 N3 ~$ x5 a! H  P2 N5 q# l
與商品和商家無關.
* A2 u1 Q: t2 J5 I. [雖然好明顯係推缷責任，不過又吹佢唔脹.......* R3 C+ R9 b& ~3 ^

$ M! F2 S( _$ _* Z# ?d公司全部都利字當頭8 R7 o! r& k) X- j
佢真係睬你都傻啦..1 B7 ]' m0 _: F8 D" \6 m
唔推缷責任佢仲d咩野做..

LMQ

Originally posted by gunners at 2005-6-2 08:19 AM:" T3 p# X+ m) I7 G) G7 o& m' J
咁擁有mp3機都應屬違法.  :x

: T; a0 [! V  z1 d
我有兩部喎4 x4 q" i# {1 h& h( c/ |( d
咁我咪double懲罰??