<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 校園槍擊案的反思
返回列表 回復 發帖
Originally posted by Lee3 at 2007-4-22 09:18 AM:
6 B: n  r2 b5 }- P3 m" N6 Q" M/ {
  Q# G, R. g8 A' x% i. ]" f
well I have to ask you about drunk driving, since most countries' drinking age is 18 and the US is 21. Does your country ban alcohol when drunk driving kills people? No, and are there more incidents of drunk driving killing people than guns, definitely. Just because our 2nd amendment allows Americans to buy guns doesn't mean it's a bad law or obscure law or any less safe. In fact, it's MUCH safer to have a law that allows people to buy guns. For one, people will buy guns no matter what, the problem with that is you have no legal way to track who has what gun. In America, you get a background check before you can get a gun, and there's a 3 day wait. After that you are in a database so if the gun you own(numbered of course) shot someone, you'll get questioned/arrested/jailed. I don't see that happening to the people who have guns in China.
  G& h6 ]4 c2 u8 S; H7 y( M/ G( n
5 L) |# c) }) NAnd secondly, when you give rights to people, there will be a small number who will abuse those rights. Of course, when you don't give rights to people you don't have to worry about it, but then that won't be a democracy. America's a democracy, and that's why they have such laws, of course I'm not saying it's perfect because there are people who break laws or worse, find loopholes, but it's a system that works for us and it gives the people a chance to fix those loopholes and make life better. That's what makes a civilized country, where politicians have to be responsible to the people they are governing over, and a means of fixing loopholes or archaic laws that are no longer relevant. The 2nd amendment will NEVER be irrelevant as long as people have guns.
1 P/ J+ j" M* j. P8 O0 A" p4 C" K7 p, s( p3 b* ]- d: B
! S. k4 W# i, `# u
如果你要渣車 首先要考車牌 要經過指導 考試合格
) ?: {5 q5 Z5 Z9 T6 ^而且你身體無問題(視力等等) 你先可以渣車出街
  U) o  I  c" ^2 X# O; b但係係美國 買槍 會唔會限制你先經過指導 要証明身體狀況無問題是准買呢?
  I% O' Q; E+ E  e) E6 S好肯定係無 條韓國仔痴線既都買到槍 已經係一個好大既溜洞 4 r4 Q1 b' H( t" r3 s
所以你用醉駕同合法持槍去比較 係唔恰當 ! D0 k3 |# K" W& M8 K" R
危險駕駛可以至命 賣槍比心理唔正常既更危險 點可以唔重新檢討有關法律???
* ?( W) \) V) G5 n而且你話我知 有監管槍械既地方 邊度出現過學園槍擊案呢?
1 j+ ^5 v' [3 ~無錯 如果一d有立法監管槍械既地方 你想要有槍你都可以透過黑市買到槍
4 w: a$ ^+ a9 c0 _- K! K但係你可唔可以依家買一支比我睇下??香港幾耐先會出現一單同槍械有關既案件) o' A. c9 ^. d9 ~. T8 ~
你又睇番美國 幾耐有一單 每隔幾個月就一單校園擊案
. a  X& ~- K8 O: o8 ^* v我唔明d友仔點可以話 同賣槍管制寬鬆無關
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 校園槍擊案的反思

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。