abc123aa

咁摩連奴講得都有道理喎,球証如果自己係睇到既基本上唔洗問旁證,但係果個角度旁邊睇唔睇到杜奧巴手球都已經係一個問題,所以球證走去問旁證係比較怪,問黎唔知做乜.......不過如果旁證話睇唔到的話球證應該唔會吹手球,所以搞到奇奇怪怪咁............

abc123aa

Originally posted by cd-key at 2006-3-21 12:12 PM:


1999

就係因為睇唔到先要用旁證,如果唔係要旁證黎做乜,係唔係球證睇唔到offside就唔係offside?

你就真係1999,有睇場波既都知杜奧巴真係手球,而且旁證未必睇到佢手球
咁旁證睇唔到的話問旁證黎做乜?果個位旁證點會清楚睇到手球先,我就唔信旁證清清楚楚咁睇到杜奧巴手球,
既然球證係場內應該比旁證清楚(球證正確黎講應該係睇到先o岩),而杜奧巴手球既時候對方既守衛係幾乎將杜奧巴手球既情況遮住,
而且依家討論既問題唔係話判得唔正確,而係旁證點會清楚咁睇到佢手球,同埋球證點解又要問佢?,既然球證係場內都未必清楚睇到的話,比富咸既守衛遮住視線既旁證又點會清楚咁睇到?如果球證真係睇到的話亦都唔洗問旁證

唔好見係車路士就首先話佢講既野唔o岩,冇錯,杜奧巴的確係手球,但係問題係旁證亦都的確未必清楚咁睇到佢手球

abc123aa

Originally posted by SINGLEUNG2005 at 2006-3-21 12:33 PM:
支持abc,因為看問題必須客觀,不能有成見,

我都唔係車仔迷,點解我會咁講呢?因為果個角度要清楚睇到的確係比較難叫人信服,而且球證亦都奇奇怪怪咁走去問旁證,既然你自己係睇到的話洗乜問旁證呢?
只不過今次杜奧巴的確係犯左手球,摩連奴係文中亦都冇話球證判得唔o岩,只係話受唔住富咸球員既壓力,上次車仔對西布朗賽後足總話唔可以有超過三個球員圍住球證投訴,咁今次富咸又如何?唔止三個啦

abc123aa

Originally posted by iknow at 2006-3-21 06:56 PM:
杜奧巴球波根本就係手球ｌａ，富咸去...

就係因為上次對西布朗車仔球員因為對方既雙腳攔截車仔球員所以去投訴,賽後比足總話唔可以有超過三個球員圍住球證,今次富咸點止三個呀............

abc123aa

Originally posted by terryjog06 at 2006-3-22 02:46 AM:

都唔知會唔會罰住......
同埋可能o...

我諗應該唔會罰既

abc123aa

Originally posted by iMacc at 2006-3-22 10:26 AM:
最後想講唔知大家覺唔覺得其實摩連奴都應該睇到手球...係咁叫d球員返中圈開波...好似作賊心虛咁好搞笑~

教練一定係幫自己球隊嫁啦........

abc123aa

Originally posted by iMacc at 2006-3-22 10:26 AM:
其實圍球証都會有好多種唔同嘅情況~

我諗最重要嘅係當時班球員嘅態度....同埋每個球証嘅接受情度都唔同...唔可以一概而論~

球証問旁証我就更加覺得無問題...球証睇唔清楚就梗係會問吓旁証架啦...唔係要個旁証嚟做咩~

呢場波個問題係個旁証根本就唔係太肯定係手球...如果唔係就一早舉咗旗啦...但係睇到都唔奇...起碼我睇直播睇得好清楚係手球...重喺度諗緊球証點會睇唔到...有時唔一定話要好清楚睇到個球員手球先判...因為有時個波離哂身咁都控到其實經驗豐富嘅球証都會判斷到係唔係手球~

我記憶所及今季有一場波就真係離哂大譜喇...嗰場巴路士用手控個波落嚟先射....慢鏡所見球証拉利重要兜口兜面咁跑緊埋去巴路士度....

點解又話d球証針對車仔呢~?
我又好唔明...今季泰利三番四次禁區手球都無判12碼喎...今次加拿斯嗰球根本就唔係要波~

重有我今場發現一樣嘢...就係車仔唔知係咪唔慣輸波...今場輸得好無品...先有林伯想打人咁樣...之後再有加拿斯要腳唔要波...

最後想講唔知大家覺唔覺得其實摩連奴都應該睇到手球...係咁叫d球員返中圈開波...好似作賊心虛咁好搞笑~

細哨輸緊波都搵個頭撞人啦,細哨係大家眼中咁神聖都會咁做咯,更何況係其他球員呀

依家既問題係話球證去問旁證梗係唔清楚既情況下先問嫁啦,咁既然係場內既球證都睇唔清楚咁場外既旁證點會清楚?難道球證經驗就唔豐富?只不過依家球證係判得o岩,根本冇錯判

abc123aa

Originally posted by iMacc at 2006-3-22 11:10 AM:
我就覺得細哨有球味但唔係話好踢得好乾淨嗰隻我都唔小次見佢踢人後腳....如果講乾淨我諗非連尼加莫屬...我就覺得唔係話輸波就有權發脾四~

好難講嘅...有時係角度問題...有時又會有人遮住...唔一定話球証一定睇得清楚過球証嘅....只不過球証可以好主動咁走去跟住個波啫~

細哨球味係有,不過唔夠大哨咁乾淨囉,冇乜邊d球員可以做到大哨咁,比人剷都唔出聲

咁又係~但球證咁做好難唔令人覺得奇怪囉

abc123aa

Originally posted by iMacc at 2006-3-22 11:11 AM:

佢心態我好明白不過嗰一刻佢個表情真係好搞鬼~

哈哈

abc123aa

Originally posted by iMacc at 2006-3-22 11:33 AM:
其實爭拗係話點解兩個球証即時都無反應...但之後傾完個共識係手球呢~?

我覺得係「之後傾完個共識係手球呢」