abc123aa

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-9-29 10:19 PM:
依家碧咸勁過施丹啦, 光芒都蓋過晒佢, so 施丹今年退休我唔覺得出奇

打埋今年一定退休,要碧咸代替施丹都幾難.......碧咸都係打返右中場啦,多d斬波埋禁區,唔好話入波,威脅都大啦,沙加度就應該少d上去,後返少少就啱,古迪接施丹班雖然係可以,但係古迪既狀態並唔係場場都可以咁勁做到d靚既短傳

abc123aa

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-9-29 06:51 PM:
始終兩個人既風格都完全唔同，好難話...

係呀,碧咸比兩腳靚既短傳可能得,但係長期靠佢根本冇可能= ="

abc123aa

Originally posted by scorerhk at 2005-9-30 12:50 AM:
其實唔係碧咸勁左,而係自從碧咸加盟皇...

同意,之前叫佢防守做多d,進攻參與唔多,所以好少見到佢= ="

abc123aa

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-9-30 12:55 AM:
仲有一個原因係今場冇出朗拿度,前面有魯爾同巴迪斯達後上,制空權強左好多,有巴迪斯達之後皇馬可以打多瓣波

暫時黎講都係羅賓奴打後備好d

abc123aa

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-9-30 01:56 AM:

羅賓奴講技術係皇馬都可以話數一數二,但佢d射波真係唔掂,球球都射唔中,皇馬入波都仲要靠朗拿度

仲有就係魯爾依家好似掂返咁,有返果種領導既味道,羅賓奴都係係後備吸引下經驗先啦,咁快比佢打正選唔係咁好

abc123aa

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-9-30 02:16 AM:
依家睇睇下覺得施丹都可以冇,但朗拿度...

初初唔習慣冇左施丹,依家慢慢習慣返,所以冇問題,但施丹出返黎又會依賴佢,盧森保高都係慢慢淡出施丹啦,否則得不償失,朗拿度都有返咁上下重要性,始終佢係射手,都係靠佢入波多

abc123aa

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-9-30 11:35 PM:
碧咸扭波都唔差架, 不過佢唔駛成日扭渣嘛, 記唔記得前幾年踢曼聯o個陣連過四五個皇馬後衛之後勁射入網呀
罰球方面施丹更加比唔想啦, 碧咸射十次罰球起碼入七個, 施丹射廿次先入得o個一兩次
帶波速度施丹直頭係慢添啦, 相反碧咸帶住個波都走得好快
防守方面碧咸破壞對方攻勢o既次數仲多過希古拿同加維臣佢地添呀

施丹雖然帶波慢,但佢比短傳同埋盤球果下真係過到人,唔似得C7咁,得個快字同亂字.......

abc123aa

Originally posted by kanu222 at 2005-9-30 11:29 PM:
碧咸擅長的是長傳,短傳不時有交失情況,分波的通常是中場指揮之類,長短傳都幾好

係皇馬要碧咸做中場指揮都幾難,因為唔係重心球員呀嘛,如果碧咸係曼聯就唔同

abc123aa

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-1 12:42 AM:

施丹好少過到人, 不過佢對腳可以伸得好長, so 個波可以圍住佢個身兜圈而靠個身位護住個波

梗係啦,佢交波多過扭波

abc123aa

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-1 01:16 AM:

正確講佢，佢係過到人，不過過完無幾耐人地又會追返上黎。

跟住佢又再過多次,哈哈