abc123aa

呢條例有幾多人知都成問題啦.......
基本上係球場係唔會將呢球當成越位,雖然係有呢條例係度

abc123aa

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-6 03:49 PM:

咁龍門呢？

龍門走左出去樸波,基本上好多球員都未必知呢條例,就算連球証都係

abc123aa

Originally posted by ahho319 at 2005-10-6 04:48 PM:
keeper 係出左黎
但佢後面仲有兩個人...一個係希比亞
另一個係鏡頭下面(唔記得邊個囉 )....

我記得好似得一個希比亞= ="

abc123aa

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-6 05:22 PM:

咁者係真係越位啦喎

照返呢條例黎睇就係,但球証知唔知有呢條例先,利物浦教練同球員都冇投訴,可能真係人為因素影響啦,始終現場咁激好難即時記得

abc123aa

Originally posted by wai0818 at 2005-10-6 06:25 PM:
評述錯都無咁大問題 , 問題係球証都出...

呢d情況好多時都有嫁啦= ="
家下問題係究竟有冇第二位球員而佢係冇入到鏡呢= ="

abc123aa

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-6 06:58 PM:

呢條例唔係咩特別球例, 你唔好當d 球證同球員廢先得架...
我小學o個陣都知呢條例啦, 老豆同我講o既

咁如果真係冇第二位球員既話點解唔吹越位同唔投訴呢???
既然你老豆咁醒目知道既,點解d講波佬唔知既
睇黎d講波佬要讀下d球例

abc123aa

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-6 07:31 PM:

可能講波佬呃飯食吧。

係呀

abc123aa

Originally posted by brightlee at 2005-10-6 07:30 PM:
I remember when I was watching this...

你係唔係話果度既講波佬話明顯係越位???
咁球証同利物浦班職球員都幾好野下.....

abc123aa

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-6 07:59 PM:
先多謝你讚家嚴, 佢解釋呢條例俾我係因為當時正進行 90 世界盃, 有個類似咁o既情況, 我記得當時d 講波佬都有講過 (唔知係咪陳譚)
呢d 係普通球例, 我意思係話知道條例都冇咩大不了, 而且所有球證一定會知 (因為有會員話呢個情況 - 龍門前過兩個後衛 - 比較少見, 連球證都未必知)
反而講波佬我覺得未必會知, 因為佢地真係冇讀過d 球例, 而且出錯o既機會都幾多, 千祈唔好當佢地係權威就得 la

唔洗客氣
我同意你講唔好當d講波佬係權威呢個論點
依家既情況係如果真係冇第二個球員係前過祖高爾既話,啫係越位啦,
因為希比亞既角色變左係龍門,同普通單刀越位既道理一樣,
我見有時呢d通常球証都唔吹越位,所以我唔知球証知唔知呢條例,但應該會知囉
可能真係比較少見同埋可能冇咩案例參考,其實呢球同謝列美入果球一樣,只不過係謝列美後上咁解

唔知紅字果度講得啱唔啱呢,唔啱既話指教下

abc123aa

Originally posted by wer at 2005-10-6 08:01 PM:

帶到氣氛就得

基本上講解到場波就ok
如果場波係馬啟仁講既話佢可能知,因為之前亨利快開罰球佢都講到出黎係咩事