F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
8 Z/ a# N8 K. v: t9 L, d( hM is for his pride. Y( \: k0 G; w6 P1 H
L is for visiting her lover$ S$ F# [& m- U) ?1 j/ F
B is for money6 }/ n! l" o, k7 E7 R& `
S is for sex  Y- B+ `, O$ I2 s# Z
except F, he can't get anything
/ A6 d( [. |% P, x2 Z$ R' Pbut he just did something wrong for friends
8 P, y, V* [3 k) G: j# \therefore, I wound like to support F
7 U; u2 F( \3 C8 Y1 }0 b/ @Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
! n& v% p1 E' z% d3 v& V7 l( g6 e. d( x  I6 U
from good to bad
$ e1 w& s/ G( [' ?, qF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
4 b" |* w9 Y% `/ O9 H準時12:00& B2 j" Z' e+ n; t0 f  \$ M3 E9 t
" x5 m8 a  q' v9 E
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me5 D/ P- d" T5 M3 x1 Y3 k* }
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case! N+ {8 p7 X5 F, T$ r: D

1 s7 P) v* }' I3 h! D2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?$ j" o" n5 i, ~; t: K' w

) i1 M  C- |8 }. ]) E8 V: vI believe this is very hard to be together
* A; j  Y: T! G' n4 l. m/ _but I still trust that both of them can be together