F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves+ D- r/ W8 b4 J
M is for his pride
4 s" b- R4 {" @% E3 T. `# q: ~  zL is for visiting her lover& E6 d: |& |, T
B is for money- V. w) s4 X! g, c6 I  b
S is for sex
; |4 V* d' j3 L3 [  E: Hexcept F, he can't get anything
" I5 d- E4 C1 }) Jbut he just did something wrong for friends, I. L( ?3 |7 ?, f7 g: ^% i
therefore, I wound like to support F5 Q7 [4 N8 @% W1 Q( H. z( h
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything$ p& i& S# Q8 v' z! j$ @# D+ t* ?

. S3 |3 _8 F* r; Q, S. Gfrom good to bad
$ c$ r, Q& K  ]6 `" AF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
+ w2 k% V' L" ^4 f4 e準時12:008 \6 B0 F: A/ y; L1 M3 o
/ |/ w8 I) [5 f. X* R# C
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
* @+ a: t) a; [( [2 xI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case+ [& g- ~7 D, ?

$ {! Z; V7 c) S& O6 r: K2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?3 L0 o& a  L& N7 _9 ?1 f

/ i1 H) `  F# u% c1 _. c  D* R9 \I believe this is very hard to be together
+ h' Q! {% `7 i6 wbut I still trust that both of them can be together