F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves! }, S: X: ~9 t7 D8 o
M is for his pride9 a7 E: @. \, h. I: z
L is for visiting her lover
) M3 D5 F' g; x$ P) c3 ?) ZB is for money# \1 a* I) m6 J" f2 X3 J. N
S is for sex
9 o, b/ I9 q& C3 _( b( _except F, he can't get anything* r  P& D1 o$ d2 ^0 ~) X( F
but he just did something wrong for friends. d4 b! H9 J1 q
therefore, I wound like to support F
5 g  A$ |# i) l# k% l) J% \1 t& T/ d1 |Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything& c1 |+ P1 ^4 c" u) f1 B, ?; `

$ m5 j$ d9 x  X+ @from good to bad
& p/ d9 b4 F- ?- X9 M' K3 SF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:$ I' p! p' `% O" b: O
準時12:00
+ v: \  C' W; S& I+ d7 Q1 [; A+ ]; O8 _' z/ n- `" v3 T# u) m3 x
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
" q( j3 r/ V9 D" B: L/ JI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
- Y2 y9 U" Z! {! k9 `
$ C6 J, z6 @. V/ Y8 }* E. i2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?: \2 }2 u9 `2 J

( m( T, e9 O! b, L9 [I believe this is very hard to be together
/ b: J. V/ G6 K, Q4 jbut I still trust that both of them can be together