jsqaure99

true say, good example.
/ I( y3 ~! h6 a. Y; N$ U4 v% {by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.  i" }/ n$ F: r. H/ Z+ j0 j5 J! V" c, N* _, c
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will./ I* x  v- a, D6 `6 J# g* X
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
2 [1 D% @4 F: K# j! L% h( \3 YNO OFFENCE
4 E* w5 {+ u2 S$ ?: @5 ~但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
" c; ]. B! n+ Z4 i. M3 ]) q7 Y係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
3 F3 z: z: ~6 I0 `IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢( G/ y* g$ L! g) q) a% |  R
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢; l9 b9 j. ?  F  U- l+ Z
我唔知
4 }6 F  Y, _! N3 V. X但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
0 v8 j7 ?5 k7 U% }1 Q會唔會覺得未夠班呢
4 h, Y* ^  F; g: H1 K- m  X2 m, A人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
4 I, K1 H! @4 J( X7 J9 N% s2 {但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
0 l7 M9 _. {) H) |/ ~又點解釋
3 |7 s+ u7 u' ]! q
3 P! a" \( P0 s9 |0 y仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
& l4 `/ a! a* k0 x6 e- V- P以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
  A1 r( V) `* E家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
& O* H+ H, U, d% r/ h9 ]: s- ]講得好
0 q5 B5 p. Z6 D仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈( D1 p( J3 d/ ]# U& j) y
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:. G4 d# L' o, K; P- {5 Z
/ @. B" Z* A, L' ]- m6 j3 o
! \( z! ?7 N) J3 _) n6 e
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
$ I! ^# `6 k; c( F/ j" q5 D4 A  c$ Y, N" p" _1 q
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

+ |/ n) E3 W& |
, A  ~9 m0 e( p# C: h6 Q2 E2 o$ W- J/ W8 C; j, ?
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗