jsqaure99

true say, good example.( N1 @' w0 G' |) R  x" ]' w
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.. w; \. C' d$ [' X* J
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.. C& J1 x& h: B: ?9 `
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
. ?, `2 ?4 o' J8 YNO OFFENCE 7 G1 ^" F- B4 v. v
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣% l; w- [3 G; ?4 _
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
. J& M) P% ^) @! a* s" q6 yIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢! G8 w3 I. L1 ^' R+ F
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
- N' M2 T" }/ U$ A我唔知' O9 u1 b6 H  z( W) J3 w/ W( K% g' Z$ J
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐) ]: E$ u1 T6 T
會唔會覺得未夠班呢
  t! X' ?6 p9 e8 [0 `0 d人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附7 i+ L  M# m) X3 {6 s$ e5 B
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
8 m- [# U1 u3 }/ E又點解釋4 h: J( k$ R, M( t& Q

: f" T5 M# `* ]' r8 o仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回* E$ m, S! S# Z% V
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到1 V' P- ~- J; F0 k% z% j" B7 k: U5 E
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
) r; _7 y6 C8 k* J講得好' L; D; j- h) M) {. m2 m* F
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
+ B+ Q: v8 Z# ^+ R# H( {% r我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
+ T" d0 y2 A9 H- M: R9 Z" C- L) X4 U( d  D2 N; p+ z

3 K( V: ]' G! g: l* q! j3 d3 A証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
8 L- W4 s# t3 G4 ]/ `9 O# B
6 q6 b5 t7 l7 F( }用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

$ r/ x9 c# Y: @( M) A4 C
* k* H; s+ p$ a

6 O9 y( c* G& s& _% P唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗