jsqaure99

true say, good example.) u. H) e* F7 C3 B
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
/ j% u0 j( k/ X; ~trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
4 h4 [4 Y- i3 L- rno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕/ u7 w+ j5 h9 `$ k
NO OFFENCE
6 ~! c" h9 J! A- s0 d3 C* l但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
" f) n/ Z& q" k) Q4 z係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢; X9 g* D8 P; t  n9 W4 @
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
0 I. N' T: x( K! yIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢* m( n  j* [: C( w, t+ Y
我唔知
! k" P! @0 o  E) o9 F但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐. A3 O( _8 @8 c  [; Y' W
會唔會覺得未夠班呢
9 t. r# g# e, P4 O0 N, C7 b" i0 ^人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
9 W3 T3 p1 C' k/ U) K- l$ R5 C但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇9 z  h6 w6 x0 \* A) r9 x; L6 |
又點解釋( x, i6 h( F8 Y* u
& p) ~$ R$ n' G' W! o+ P9 m/ ~
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
9 y" F) x( w4 a3 x以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到, E' R2 V4 e2 p& X+ Y/ i  k6 o; Y
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
% Z. q1 n1 Z" r0 N講得好% l( ~& u5 V5 t2 ^+ x: E' N+ m
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
6 P' O( {7 i1 `+ \- t7 b我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
/ i4 ^5 [0 N9 K& c' [6 Q7 K: p' p) ?8 v% o/ A  N) F

' D! b0 O" L( s% H, I$ ?証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
; ]& l- S* G  ?. s; k- l7 W) A% S/ V- Y) i3 g
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

6 y' K! P4 l4 k$ d1 s7 B4 h/ K) p2 r* l0 Y, s9 g$ f8 C

  ]. f/ d; K* d/ v0 A唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗