jsqaure99

true say, good example.( h0 y1 y1 d7 v& Q; s, H
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
* s) O; o% a, ~4 V  |# ptrying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.( p' f( i2 R  Z/ I4 p" H
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
) c7 q9 x9 ]" }0 u- x* t- ^# TNO OFFENCE
. @8 g. I, K/ h; q; t( M" _' }* R但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
' x1 C, }  q5 P/ p9 n, D; H係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
' Z% u9 Q9 B( T9 \IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢: u: G6 u% h+ `) f
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
! H8 [2 s% \3 r; o! m' q( [我唔知- O; s: C- x" x: ?8 n2 c* ~% }
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
3 d- D# r* l' ~. x1 p) [會唔會覺得未夠班呢2 m2 F( b. C( @
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附! f# S, v: ^$ ?3 b. ]0 ]$ P
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
" n3 ?% {2 d) k: Z3 P* }3 V$ ?又點解釋
) T* N: j1 @8 ~. n  L* @8 Q9 g- w9 D# `: T+ Y$ V
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
* S8 j, S( Z# I6 K  ?以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到: {2 Q& _9 g; N2 [. P* c- r0 ~
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材9 A4 I! S5 p% p- [0 w; d
講得好+ `; m3 n' S4 L+ P
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
+ I4 O' c4 y1 b( [我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:" g4 F8 }! W& ~4 |, j
1 {6 _( w" V! X$ [

$ K. B8 W  P$ r4 c証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
+ S  R9 m  M; P, Z$ n# k) z  v( l+ _) {
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

& T0 y) Q! ]8 J; r4 r  m- U) {
" x" _8 C  i6 Q9 s
- H# ], |6 v) V$ b) A) D) C( O$ g- {唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗