jsqaure99

true say, good example.6 n: k! x- C& B; v4 M! S; G3 ~7 I
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.) c% t* n5 _8 v
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.; ?6 c5 S/ ^/ d7 f" _. j6 e9 E
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
" X8 {1 \1 E: }. S, h( bNO OFFENCE 7 v9 S3 M$ m+ j
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
% F0 E# `+ g0 G8 x* @- ^1 K係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢2 V  h* c/ f+ d; |
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
% _2 F* M& S; ?# @% Y. i. VIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢* {3 G7 \4 I' e4 B) J8 G
我唔知
+ L# o- b& ]& L3 h1 T但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
2 ~+ _' R" E- B( N會唔會覺得未夠班呢
8 f0 F) G9 D) E* g3 O3 ^人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
9 V5 R, j8 f; v! S7 f7 f3 y; }9 P但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇! h, [- a/ O7 c2 O9 R5 `4 |: \
又點解釋" Y& n8 ^: s% e
: ^/ g& M! M* ?: q. Z3 L
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回  i& s* L/ j! l9 t" o1 `9 j' @: O
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到0 t- n  Z( T/ t. X2 V3 R% w
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
2 e) \7 t1 \4 p& C: I講得好3 |$ y0 V$ e3 j! E; Y" P
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈9 h7 C+ B" f3 e1 }* q( Y% H
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
7 N. K( b, C1 d" O2 l0 P  j1 X) t7 Y) {
7 x0 Y2 W  w! ]; s  U$ {' v
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
2 z- y& i# x- x; P& r! x  E4 K( r1 H  n0 i1 v: p
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

* X4 ~" r# [) w) o6 U+ g- ]

7 e( Y# ^( m5 I# ?( W5 H5 y* h2 I
3 Y. d) o6 \5 d) E+ a唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗