jsqaure99

true say, good example.! K( r9 ^% ?8 i3 c2 n' h
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.( g7 A$ |9 D$ M& w5 C" N
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
8 m0 W0 @6 S9 ]no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
; D- l: _2 w: |: B; S6 Q& a/ XNO OFFENCE   E- B7 C) [+ Q
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
8 ^$ X# @" R' k% T係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
. c8 Q& v3 |9 q: l2 qIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
. Z% k) f  o4 v6 l% m( @IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
9 N" g) u5 W& X& W2 }% X我唔知
/ D' u" w: S1 z# V但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
1 t/ s* F& h, y會唔會覺得未夠班呢
9 d- \" L; }$ W: D- g人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附" T  ]  ~# X6 u) `' ~
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇& y. }# G8 @& t2 {
又點解釋8 R) s3 K; P1 a( Y6 b
9 Z  }" I2 P0 L/ i9 g! h0 n) E
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
: G. ?( L" ]  w+ A" l. N以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
2 r1 v: f; P8 J3 \; U家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材# j( D; k+ j6 _$ M  p" h
講得好9 g% \2 q2 j  n
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈; P- `- {, k; k) i+ W* A
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:7 s+ }( L4 |3 b( s3 a  |: v" m
: G# u, M2 U" H9 A! ^
4 W* d; h% s, n/ U; _
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
7 `- f* K. }/ r5 q, @& A' L0 h
. m" k7 I" V" u+ e用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

, R+ P7 o1 Z# K$ m' l# ]1 n% ~
. b7 Y  A$ m/ d7 U- o
, A0 ?/ o1 }/ E9 V1 ]唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗