jsqaure99

true say, good example.
: P$ G5 [: w! d; X3 fby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.0 `- m9 V1 a2 \- M9 [/ h$ o, D8 H
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
; r" v* J# M& B" n+ N; nno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕- ?5 T" o% P: A
NO OFFENCE % \# {# v# f. q. n$ y& Y- Q. d
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
8 i8 c' r! R2 \/ ?) T( s% e$ `. c係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢2 J* ], v8 @  r! T' h1 V& q
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢3 b+ V3 t4 {. s  F* Q0 X
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
, ?6 P# ^9 P7 |/ U$ V8 ~我唔知
; P6 V3 X( [( q0 d9 N  `但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐  N* r4 l  E; ]9 e4 u( n. X5 I
會唔會覺得未夠班呢, U  s' Q8 W" K+ w' i
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附7 N; x: V* {) `& }6 |- U
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
' r6 o! Z, f: e' ^# g' U# I又點解釋* U9 @9 ]3 S, I

* n0 y) ^8 |! O! c9 Y& c7 s/ T仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
3 A! V( J) E, X2 i- D以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
3 K* w; R' ~, p( u  o家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
' `7 {+ x! d# B+ I/ v$ i  f講得好8 ^+ i$ q7 r; |3 D, {- ^# ?8 I/ |. s
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈/ L2 B' v$ [+ i6 r
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:) q$ M% A$ [, Z, J0 }0 f) m+ u3 p
& c' n. G( q& }; T- p
- v% y) N# X5 `6 P% C4 B* h  h
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
5 |. g9 k- |4 s+ R$ `9 g4 W5 V3 I! q, H. f! {5 I
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

1 O/ u7 g" M) y9 a& h2 Z# n

! A6 g7 V8 `: J2 i  Y9 d
. g. W, W" O2 [6 y唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗