ciger

Originally posted by chicken at 2005-9-9 00:13:


No midfields support because owen cannot hold the ball well and waiting others to run. If you lose the ball fast, others have no enough time to support.

足球上有一樣野叫做走位,如果你有睇巴西對智利阿祖入第一球,朗拿度冇掂波但牽引住智利d後衛,比阿祖起腳,但你睇英格蘭,你有冇見過兩位'阿特'上前幫手?奧雲速度快,如果佢多走位,一定有空間製造出黎比佢地,而且進攻中場唔係只接應前鋒回傳,兩邊出波佢地都要入禁區幫手,你又有冇見佢地有吖?

ciger

有人話英格蘭班球員狀態唔好,但我覺得佢地唔係生理上狀態唔好,係心理上狀態唔好,即係有氣有力但位置唔慣所以無所適從,所以胡禮菲臘斯,A高爾等冇問題,但林柏特謝拉特就位置重疊,唔知點算好,搞到行行企企,冇乜建樹

ciger

Originally posted by chicken at 2005-9-9 13:58:


Owen is now defended by Two def...

大家都係11個打11個,兩個人mark奧雲,其他人仲冇空位,係咪要5個人mark奧雲其他人先有空位?入波唔一定要靠奧雲,林柏特謝拉特就係好有入球能力嘅中場,但4-5-1之敗筆就係擺兩個進攻中場諗住加強攻力,點知反而令到佢地無所適從,連原本嘅作用都冇埋,而且出朗尼同奧雲,唔掂咪轉返4-4-2囉,但朗尼始終墮得太後,兩個進攻中場又唔上,即係得奧雲一個,唔好話奧雲吖,朗拿度都死啦

ciger

Originally posted by chicken at 2005-9-9 17:13:


2 players vs Owen, but only one...

依照你咁講,即係英格蘭太倚重奧雲個位置,但其實英格蘭現今最引以為傲嘅係佢地認為自己有兩個世界一級攻中,所以先打單箭頭,騰出多個位打雙攻中,所以失敗係艾歷臣高估左打兩個攻中嘅威力,98年法國d前鋒又夠廢啦,但佢地中場出色,可補救到前鋒不濟嘅問題,但英格蘭就唔得,即係話問題在於佢中場做唔到艾歷臣想像中嘅野(可能係艾歷臣安排不當或高估左佢地嘅能力)

[ Last edited by ciger on 2005-9-9 at 05:44 PM ]

ciger

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-9 17:50:
我覺得係艾歷臣安排得唔好,同謝拉特同...

另一方面係謝拉特同林柏特冇創造力,往往係禁區頂前鋒得奧雲一個比人mark住冇人交,射又冇位就唔知點算好,咪唯有橫傳囉,施丹細哨值錢之處在於佢地有d意想不到嘅創造力,巴塞對車仔球笠射謝拉特同林柏特我諗佢地諗都冇諗過可以咁處理
總之你冇創造型攻中就唔好打4-5-1啦,出兩個工兵型攻中係冇用嘅,'多'唔等於好

ciger

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-9 18:10:

始終都係4-4-2好,佢地係球會又打慣,國家隊本身都係用開呢個陣,無謂走去轉陣啦,一陣搞到個個球員都冇晒態既話死喇........

不過如果搞唔好謝拉特同林柏特嘅分工,打乜都死

ciger

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-9 18:16:

4-4-2我諗冇問題,教練只係叫佢地打返平時自己打開既野既話我諗咁仲好,放開黎打~

問題係如果碧咸右邊,咁邊個打防中?碧咸防中,又邊個打左邊?始終要搞清楚,因為英格蘭係打隊形,唔同巴西法國打個人能力

ciger

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-9 18:26:

咪打返右邊囉,好似係皇馬咁,助攻助守,左邊可以用SWP或者祖高爾,一樣都得,唔通再用朗尼打左邊咩,朗尼始終鍾意係中路走黎走去........

基本上左右中場都唔係問題,主要係攻中同防中,謝拉特定林柏特,如果諗住互相補位好容易出現唔上唔落局面,對北愛爾蘭就係咁

ciger

Originally posted by 瑞比 at 2005-9-9 20:45:

夏格維斯都4分,佢落場差d輸多球呀,係咪以為佢踢北愛呀

ciger

羅賓遜就冇得講啦,人地球波射得咁靚