ciger

仲有一個原因係今場冇出朗拿度,前面有魯爾同巴迪斯達後上,制空權強左好多,有巴迪斯達之後皇馬可以打多瓣波

ciger

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-30 01:26:

暫時黎講都係羅賓奴打後備好d

羅賓奴講技術係皇馬都可以話數一數二,但佢d射波真係唔掂,球球都射唔中,皇馬入波都仲要靠朗拿度

ciger

依家睇睇下覺得施丹都可以冇,但朗拿度就一定要有,始終射門命中率都係佢最好,冇朗拿度硬係射極都唔入,就算魯爾回勇都係差d,佢今年入幾球波都幾易射(朗拿度傳比佢果兩球),而朗拿度就經常可以將一些唔係全面性機會嘅波都射入

ciger

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-9-30 23:35:
碧咸扭波都唔差架, 不過佢唔駛成日扭...

碧咸罰球10球入7球?今季佢都未開齋,但射罰球一定唔止10球啦,佢扭波同速度都叫做好,你打WE將佢D速度較到99呀

ciger

碧咸一場好波啫,而且都唔係靠佢一個,魯爾功勞都唔細得過佢,上場聯賽更加係朗拿度個人表演,咁快就想搵佢替施丹,入多球罰球咪同比利齊名,可想而知D球迷幾偏愛碧咸

ciger

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-1 12:17:

哈哈哈
射罰球一定唔止10球,佢扭波可以叫做ok既,不過速度就唔得啦,不過加速果下都可以既,不過兩秒後比人追返= ="""

如果佢扭淑都叫OK,咁盧斯奧都算好扭,我覺得盧斯奧扭波都好過碧咸

ciger

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-1 12:44:

唔好意思,依家只係討論,唔係話佢得喎.........就算係一場好波都值得讚丫,我地d皇馬fans成隊都有讚有彈,唔會偏幫任何一人

你睇下果d施丹罰球廿球先入一球,碧咸就10球入7球,施丹冇速度但碧咸帶波速度高嘅言論就知我講乜野係'偏愛'
而我亦冇話唔值得讚,不過唔等於可以代替施丹

[ Last edited by ciger on 2005-10-1 at 02:12 PM ]

ciger

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-1 18:34:
要碧咸取代施丹一定成功過取代馬基里尼

咁不如話一定比取代卡斯拿斯成功,應該係碧咸只可以取代費高,但取代唔到施丹同馬基里尼

ciger

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-2 00:46:
其實大家有冇諗過冇左施丹o既皇馬同冇左碧咸o既皇馬, 邊隊弱d 呢?

一定係冇施丹啦,有碧咸嘅皇馬1個杯都未羸過,又點算強呀