fatfatdragon

乜可以 quote 條 link 去人地d bbs ?  4 }: i# h) Z0 N* M, }5 T! U
copy 人地 d post 再呃多兩個 post (thread#2, 3)
6 F9 p, g* H, m+ [2 A1 c而且可以咁多粗口 (攪到要用 fiter)
4 ?5 G8 k" v" U. u
" I: c! ~& H1 e唔想用中文同你講，睇你都喺唔識. & ~3 u, X- m# D5 o+ n" H
! Q3 t4 r( x8 n- z- Y3 y
I think that the most dirty issue is not the one mentioned in your post, or those mentioned in the attached link. The most dirty is the mouth who say the arguement with so much foul  lanaguage.  
1 ~6 p: ^( z* T& ?1 GI can tell you that the practice mentioned in the attached link is also comon to foreigner, it is the problem of personal behaviour, but not related to the culture. I see some US just using their hand to take up food and puting into mouth directly and then taking the food again. Can I just say that the whole country of people as what you mentioned ?5 H8 i0 v8 Z& g7 g* [- C

% h6 v$ \% D! e: ?If you don't like sharing food, just eat yourself at corner.
% f5 }) u9 s# h' j" E5 F! w
5 |1 [! {1 x0 e7 F1 _+ mPlease also open the eye to have a look:" A0 }; s6 ^/ D; C
中國人眼中的外國人
5 j& ~. |5 R' J, U4 ?1 C! U7 e8 n6 A" Y3 J9 Y  @4 w9 r/ X
[ Last edited by fatfatdragon on 2005-7-31 at 09:46 PM ]

fatfatdragon

Originally posted by michaelwong71 at 2005-7-31 09:30 PM:* _, _* {% N' J/ k- {+ F$ [4 Y
佢地寫甚麼? 唔寫fuxking就無野好寫. ...

. J. u, R. n( u4 K7 D2 `& E( h4 v& K& k' l; R
Bro, 唔多認同你咁講. 呢d人冇資格和 chinese 有任何關係. 就算 fxxxxxx chinese 都冇資格做. 最多只有做 fxxxxxx 人, 放心外國唔會承認佢地喺外國人就算滿口英文.  7 p6 d; q! g3 h& i
0 D6 ~1 o7 z5 @4 F* P8 I% Z/ B3 c
Brother, I can't agree with your speech. Those people do not qualified to talk together with the word "chinese". It is even true that they cannot be said as fxxxxxx chinese. They can just be regarded as fxxxxxx country people, as foreign country will not accept that they are their country people even they can speak English (not necessary be good).

fatfatdragon

Originally posted by michaelwong71 at 2005-7-31 10:11 PM:5 C! _1 [- ^; `' n& h( B
, E- b4 s0 w8 o$ m% c4 c" O- C/ m
3 L7 @+ f1 M% y& v% U
你去搜索下bwk0317以往的posting就知佢識幾多中文字. 點攪佢都係佢口中的Fuxking Chinese. 還要係極品呀.

& V: X: f, [) S% u8 `
4 k8 l7 |: q3 \  {. L' Z1 _3 B4 z& q請睇 thread #10, 我覺得佢連 fxxxxxx chinese 都冇資格叫. 應該連 chinese 都刪除, 只可以叫 fxxxxxx 人.

fatfatdragon

Originally posted by bwk0317 at 2005-7-31 10:39 PM:  P7 c& [1 Y# K; m- b9 {0 F
fatfatdragon, u dont even know ...

6 u6 g: W! F3 Q& R

, ]9 [& d4 [; r2 B. c3 p

Originally posted by fatfatdragon at 2005-7-31 09:36 PM:
4 z: F; l1 e- y( A# |+ U2 \, U乜可以 quote 條 link 去人地d bbs ?  & v% s3 {' A5 ~3 l- q9 d% C
copy 人地 d post 再呃多兩個 post (thread#2, 3)& N: b6 \5 y' E0 g+ a
而且可以咁多粗口 (攪到要用 fiter)
, O+ q! s  N- k( D% b

" Y0 B" l6 M, y  _5 E( N
" |/ j1 D, X4 H
bwk0317兄, 似乎你可以看懂中文, 我都喺用回中文.  請睇一睇我在 thread#8 所說的幾句話. 我有指出所見的是轉貼別的論壇內其他人啲post.
! j+ v( r1 D% `' a! w(translation of red highlighted sentense: copy other people posts and separate in two two more threads so as to get two more post counts)
6 X1 I3 `4 B$ l0 ?) }% G0 ^( {1 [4 Y
對不起, 因為我在這些轉貼中 (有3個posts) 沒有看見任何 [轉貼], [forward] 字眼; 加上沒有看見樓主(poster)的任何個人意見, 所以覺得樓主認同此等言論; 最後多謝你的澄清. 如果因此而發生誤會實屬無奈. (我會停止在這方面的爭辯.).
$ j# }" O, Q% H5 v3 c
& d/ X/ z- V- z8 C我對最初原文對中國文化的否定和偏見已表達, 唔阻其他兄弟姊妹的繼續發表.