coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
+ h9 l1 B) d0 }$ P) R- D8 f5 u我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

/ x0 ~+ m8 s: Q" I. [, I

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:) y$ T0 D# ~. v$ U
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

' z- I- E9 I/ K& ~7 p5 |: ^+ J
參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
  g& K7 `5 D# `% Y3 K# M/ o! D! W( o" J6 \$ h6 L! Q
無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~' W! e0 i7 }% Q- E5 @3 I

' w8 q- b1 i( t8 w# R: R請珍惜會員戶口!~
# R; F/ s6 h/ q  i# Q7 g6 M: X' `
. ~& v8 X8 O3 N+ L
/ N/ j- X3 I, C  _1 T8 ^
: W* J+ T% E5 G0 s2 K
& b/ v* O! `2 }+ `' n講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
( ^& G( X& b8 S* P我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

4 m" L' u& N2 L3 h

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
" r9 m2 ?% I) O8 d9 \我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

# C6 d; \. Y0 Q* n

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:) n" T0 Y6 o8 Q
2 a6 a: g; I7 h  w- x6 U
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。1 M. Y5 n1 s0 }- V- w
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

; S9 n& m2 o2 s
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
$ v) u2 Z% }& R7 \! U/ G: z成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~& V9 K1 m8 I- U5 \( P! a
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~