arthur8088

o dear...i cant believe someone would say John Terry or C.Ronaldo were both bribed...
would someone be that stupid to bribe players who will be playing in a match watching by Billions of people in this world??

guys...Stop watching Shaolin Soccer~~they are not "Golden Right Foot"~~

Sometimes your expected result or mostly predicted scores did not come out, it doesnt mean that's a fixed match~~

cheerss~~

arthur8088

Originally posted by lizard at 2008-5-23 23:31:

C.Ronaldo were both bribed


C.Ronaldo 有無corruption，我無講，也不多講！
不過 Terry 會係無人干擾下，有咁既絕頂低級失誤，我就認為絕大問題！

you cant compare basketball with soccer in this situation~~it's totally unfair...
after 120 mins hard fight, players are exhausted both phycailly and mentally, Penalty shoot-out is already a big affection to them~~ i dont see how low-class it is for missing a penalty kick...even for a big-named players~~

if you argue with Terry is not mentally world-classed, I would agree~~

絕頂低級失誤??yeh..there's one in the match, it's not Terry, It's Dider Drogba~~
Slapping Vidic during a match is really 絕頂低級失誤

looks like you have not participated into any competitive team-work sports game....agree with #15 said, you would not understand their feeling at that moment~~

in #13, you said 只有用陰謀論，有人收錢，故意自己滑倒啦...

Terry is being paid for around $130,000 GBP per week.(according to rumours and newspaper), how much do you think that you need to pay to him to convince him losing in such an important match, a match that would bring his England captaincy back?? a match that would bring him the championship that he dreams for since being a professional soccer player???

just one more thing, what about you try to slip on the grassy wetty pitch on purpose, but still able to kick the ball...

[ Last edited by arthur8088 on 2008-5-24 at 12:39 AM ]

arthur8088

Originally posted by lizard at 2008-5-24 23:50:
點解個個人講佢射吾入，因為壓力大？為何其他射得入波既人就會無壓力咩？呢個叫解釋理由咩

場上大部份人無打足120分鐘嘛？點解其他人又撐到十二碼都射入？

場上十幾個人都吾會滑到，偏偏只有一個人會滑到？


係NBA ，如MJ 佢平均命中約四成。但關頭時刻，佢就能將4成機會率變十成。這才叫英雄。
係12碼上，機會率射入佔八成，將八成機會率都不能達標既。只會係狗雄。


眾人：你們所持理由，不外乎〔壓力、體力。下雨.....〕
當日有份參賽既球員，先跟Terry 去比較。
其他大部份球員都有這種壓力，都用盡體力，但都能把握八成射入十二碼既機會率。正好說明你們強詞奪理。點解大部份球員都可以，唯一人吾得。
合邏輯嗎？

用蓋率邏輯分析，其他人就無問題！偏離蓋率既，就係問題？

just wonder where do you come up with "係12碼上，機會率射入佔八成"!!??
is it just a bullcrap from you!!??~~

btw, if you judge Terry as 狗雄 by missing this stupid penalty kick~~then MJ was a 狗雄 as wellll...i cant remember how many buzzer-beating shots he has missed in his life~~

arthur8088

Originally posted by lizard at 2008-5-25 01:20:
wonder 之前，吾該自己上網先睇下。

維基百科寫90% 有的網8成以上，我已經用較低標準啦？

OMG...OMG...OMG>....

you quote the statistics from 維基百科~~speechless~~
are you freaking kidding me..!!???

You are not university student, do you...??I will be freaked out if you are SERIOUSLY~~~@@___@@

is this the article you are talking about from wiki...??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penalty_kick

"A German professor who has been studying penalty statistics in the German Bundesliga for 16 years found that 76% of all the penalties during those 16 years went in, and 99% of the shots in the higher half of the goal went in[citation needed],"

OMG....this part is not even citied~~..OMG...
and i couldnt find any reserach papers to support this arguement~~~

go to Google and get some scholar's papers to support this fancy bull before saying it~~~

[ Last edited by arthur8088 on 2008-5-25 at 03:13 AM ]