奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
1 x0 |2 B3 T1 `$ C" K8 O' ]- G: ~: Q7 `
agree,! B/ @, h: a7 R: V5 j, \
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,( g/ C4 x  u9 E) Z+ F
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,; C0 l$ s( Y) h+ u' J! l4 j+ y
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

9 d/ w2 r/ P( r7 F
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html3 s/ G* p# q" {
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地( {7 q* p0 E! X6 ~
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
* n5 w+ j; o* i' M' D. kJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:7 |; i. n$ B' W" p
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
/ z* J5 x4 S# `9 }7 S2 k4 O$ S8 D6 K: Q% P
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???) u% p' q" W8 R: J) A/ m* v
/ `8 P' @  n! C7 n# a
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

. X# J. v. }) t; [5 z

1 v5 n+ K9 y9 d! |/ J- l絕對支持啦- v( {6 ~* C. A3 Z% \% h

$ U; }+ ~/ [- x: q% @' r有錯就認,打就企定
, g  g- O7 n0 t4 i6 C6 t, z9 m! @* c8 W. m+ B. S# w
無錯當然要撐到底
4 E4 O$ T( U$ r3 Z* s/ E1 e$ `
0 N4 j' \3 r  @/ {# z% l2 h但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩7 a' p1 c4 ?0 O1 T
/ Q+ N2 ?  v8 E% O" I5 ^
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得% V  @* e5 p+ ?3 w% D% {
3 t: j) {% |# ]/ E* {
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
3 p+ w1 C% ^6 r3 X7 J; L
  ?$ I) k3 ~, G0 U8 X我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
  g% X, N' C) I3 Y) {  w& U: s8 V
$ C2 r8 G& M4 A- _" |; ?; C+ U唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
" s& h5 J& e. x/ }" R3 p; V/ m. t2 S0 M" ~$ p
我唔認為lor
' y' J' U, Q5 I% Z: j/ f
3 ?0 R0 K) a8 L唔係話要整死佢地" m" Z& v6 q% z8 N) b
0 p9 z6 j8 c% j) J  g: ]4 u- ^
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用* }' B/ T1 V2 i& P8 K4 U

! A% @; c7 o$ ^& e7 v" @$ \7 u我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大; u5 s; p' [9 H! D/ Z  B
4 M4 a0 C& p0 q
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
# r0 p* k# F& E0 @' K1 _- a. O+ X. y9 e- w2 Z: h8 @9 @
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由1 m6 ?3 g2 _2 R9 P! x

) X7 B# I9 z- B  Y大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句8 N) A7 U: S+ B& e/ I
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非") u7 I. L4 I, V0 E+ F

, t) {- n# Z2 r  p( I3 a我們的大學生
% W) E' L3 U+ ]+ X7 a1 c1 H/ }" c; @- B4 v0 O! ?
9 ?/ N4 F' p8 h6 F) Q8 R

. @2 Y/ M* S/ ?1 {5 y8 X/ X# z) L6 V/ e9 g+ g

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:+ N7 I$ Z" a% J  |& Y

7 I5 h; M; E" K4 i# m1 L5 M8 @! o( o1 z
有見地 !!!
" [' w/ P+ p/ c9 P: U- V7 r現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
0 M# z4 M4 U8 i% W# l: Y
. G; r2 `1 g* f. V2 X+ X( w3 n+ H9 gI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. ; C( ^" J. I: }8 j9 _
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. - s. u$ p# a8 H% k4 p+ w+ H! o, J) h
I pretty sad that about the University official.8 ~* o9 H7 u1 a3 Q( @. v6 H) s
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
5 j+ U/ n1 X. I9 R( R7 v: p6 o4 ]/ g0 a9 e
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:! h4 ^8 z1 l8 P8 Q9 }* ]* {
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
3 Z0 j& c- l8 A7 i
5 u4 H& k% z6 I6 w[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

" q" [7 E. t, E, i- V9 L
: @: n6 z; `% ?- H1 s5 b* t0 ~兩者有何分別?
; D, i, g8 p9 w: E中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?