<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)3 w; [9 o0 l/ x5 X& Z
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
0 ?- J  C' [% I- p! b大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
( D" H" k8 m7 ]& d, h: w
I agree you points that it could be illegal
0 L4 _* J# c; j! Y# kbut that is still a "gray area". F% k0 V' X+ l
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair" f% d! |+ T; n% v; @8 s
5 B  l9 I5 y# v$ _
anyway, I want to say that is
0 K: c' q' B5 U$ z& m6 zwho is supposed to be protected by laws& @& ?- U" B0 O( b
creators?
" M4 c2 {8 n! ?, y# A% A: ubut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
, n: G, k. _5 b1 S5 ~" plet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.; H2 b; L. s% I! T! W% n3 B
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those: [0 s, U. f! q. K4 k5 r
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
9 a" A  q. P3 l" O其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
/ j3 v1 w: I( f7 D我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:6 \' f0 s2 j: F) u
0 k3 y5 z5 i' F
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
, ~& e$ x+ |! A" d
唔係喎!
2 [. {2 L% i0 ?  w1 H9 n1 k古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!9 X8 z5 V$ v0 k# ]
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!. S/ x* i. v4 }# H! Q' l9 j+ l- W( I
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!4 k$ q' ?) Q0 j! \% ~
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事+ {( [8 n! R0 d( E4 l
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
5 f" ?2 y1 i! Q+ g+ C* C& Ldun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......# E/ y  ?* ?0 s9 l6 Q1 p  u7 I
if so bad, dun download la, right?5 ^3 I) i5 X1 n- U4 `; ]& h; Y
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
4 e; G% x/ o2 A& g: S* \but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
) g8 x2 @! ]6 z! U( }% _# G8 k9 D' cno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la7 j* I/ t0 g2 L9 \
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
' @9 b$ q4 `$ c( B1 v! [using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
, _' m6 j5 n6 r& T  O- w% g9 \why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!1 E( }% d  d2 D! S7 P
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!1 z# W1 |8 A5 T9 W+ G8 D& p# T
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~" O1 l, G# g8 o
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
6 O# }* Q/ z% n5 {6 n錢就一定罰
; r5 B1 o. g: W& ]未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,0 T/ M9 t, d! v$ e9 N( e
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
+ Q6 n! d% H( W, N佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?$ f& c# }+ `" D3 L2 y
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。