<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
" i- E: I  u) r) z但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:% X* s5 _6 [( N
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
- L; \$ @  f' t; f5 d9 }: II agree you points that it could be illegal2 i) u4 {% K8 S% U0 N
but that is still a "gray area"* H; B( q. V7 L) ?1 J4 x
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair2 q% l) {( o  N

6 x0 u& P( S  a3 ]0 V5 hanyway, I want to say that is
) L; M* x+ w( e; X& [- jwho is supposed to be protected by laws* R1 D; j% y% |8 e. X  Q
creators?
& m- F1 N8 Z+ n7 b& ^5 M3 cbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
) V2 n7 S3 F, e& l" Nlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
+ h2 T& }, r4 s% Cwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
6 [: y+ L. f" g9 j& XWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
0 F! V. h  n4 j% t/ D其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
# |3 {9 r6 T+ `* m我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:# D+ k, H; H" C6 {6 t! P
+ d7 _! g6 I# B$ [5 O4 j
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
& t9 `3 h1 b: R) w6 A唔係喎!' }% ?7 A' t1 K. m# b% \* p" H
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!7 {7 q8 m3 ?3 l" E( }9 ]6 ?7 }/ d! {
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!9 l4 ~0 ~* M  ?
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
4 u( O& ^! u% i就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事4 P: v2 ?3 _/ D. F$ M" N" n
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
7 F8 o2 I5 e1 T! @9 P- t* e0 N+ n, P# adun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......( L2 {4 A, {/ U  A6 P
if so bad, dun download la, right?2 o; S+ z8 d; s3 `. x1 T4 C+ S
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^$ I( B) I7 x9 U5 T$ ]
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct  M4 A& e) ~6 ^3 r+ w8 \5 {
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la6 j! M" O  L* T5 M8 e: C
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
) d* C& Y& _! k* ?4 S) \using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........* E: M1 a5 V. c  n" x2 _
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!7 |! V  x& G  H9 Y! X( u
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
8 A5 y4 q2 m" A佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
* d2 N" S' e  _7 ?  V政府想比下馬威0的人~~
2 C2 v" d* h0 o# u錢就一定罰4 c8 B, C0 X+ w0 Z( W& g+ K
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,( r# O4 M, E* b9 z  m& f
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
2 b! y2 z9 |! i$ t佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
6 X- a6 N7 G* Z5 W/ F! x+ x8 x到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。