<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
& {4 ^' @4 Z: J0 f2 [4 p3 J但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:3 t5 u- o4 [; X6 H4 r
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
2 t. d1 D* N6 B( L3 h( ]0 p) R) h7 Z# m
I agree you points that it could be illegal
: Y0 [4 }4 i- j4 `3 Y2 T. j0 Vbut that is still a "gray area"3 Y, B1 P. G4 k. j7 @
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
: y/ G9 O+ |" d" A" {
& a0 e- ]- `$ M' T1 S/ R. eanyway, I want to say that is
# G$ n2 G! C( Y8 B# K% ^who is supposed to be protected by laws( u% H$ `5 w2 ~9 e2 H9 p  O
creators?
/ O( \" t, E  M; P, d+ Xbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
/ S/ }* C3 J1 V' \let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
6 Z$ z) g$ W: Y( }2 P# i. a; i: }& n" Owhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
7 D& U, v% e4 G! U# W/ ^% RWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
  w$ l6 @$ ~8 a; T其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
' E9 f: W& o0 M& v. o: _
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:/ w5 b" |& c6 F/ ~
% d3 Z8 c$ S6 _0 w4 s
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
& l& ^4 w, d5 l5 B" b唔係喎!
5 q( S) U; f1 d# `4 J9 J" J! c古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
1 c; a( h; j( x6 M我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!. e( a; s; b+ M) }/ h0 d  ~
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!9 b3 b4 G0 t) S$ B
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
: Y8 y# K! ?( U; Z一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
( Z+ w! V/ E7 Q  @7 G" Mdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
3 L$ r! b2 }' {& ]& Qif so bad, dun download la, right?7 y9 I- P. f5 x" L9 I. W3 k
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
/ q  |0 Q: R  j9 T) R) Jbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
% P' J% O7 {, h* g( ono need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
& e0 ?* g9 R1 x+ pso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
* i: k+ U0 E2 p  z8 {( {6 c8 cusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
  T8 t$ P7 S2 g5 a; Q4 T5 v% ~why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
4 _$ {6 i2 n2 o# @so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!2 h# ~' C; X+ y3 ^
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~9 D/ m$ q) G4 r. Z$ `
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
. m2 }$ y& a+ A; \錢就一定罰+ i$ x9 H9 N& D! t
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,7 q8 r$ a2 k- U+ m/ O2 x, ^
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
4 B2 E& Q) a/ c& |* u- A佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
$ l, B" }( U9 w到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。