<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)2 }8 z9 N0 n: W: C# @3 g
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
+ X# ~  c# q$ i. s大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
' S" T) Y  Y4 N: d+ y. C
I agree you points that it could be illegal+ i% l0 F& e9 T# [/ Q
but that is still a "gray area"
6 o$ ?! U/ n: f( Mwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair( I/ b8 ]) r6 L4 o6 _* i- ?0 i! k
- o3 X& O% G4 A# s2 x
anyway, I want to say that is2 l% u- ^' t/ a2 C
who is supposed to be protected by laws6 P2 V% B# V: b1 j
creators?) b, |- W5 p/ Y
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market) b" w, n2 B' U
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money./ U: h+ m3 q0 @$ F  L9 R% U
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those8 G- s* p% q8 a/ R7 o7 C
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
# m; c7 ?$ _' X& |其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
, s7 F# [& N, V# d0 ^1 l2 I我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
, z2 q( f/ v, l- X5 r
% v/ @. i2 ?" ^0 B. E! _5 Y我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
$ f4 P8 z" |( b. _唔係喎!" I1 V+ ~7 M% H# t) I  U$ {) e
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
5 t3 A; `4 ^7 [* X' x( ]我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!- D1 S, h( A/ C4 j
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
8 @5 J- r* ?. G& }% y' [就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
" }: y9 q- t1 f. W3 Y/ y0 _一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
' A# |' T( W  ndun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......# n- X. y3 ?% m* p- d
if so bad, dun download la, right?% g+ R4 n. S. r1 a/ k3 [
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^3 X6 ~* `" W8 @8 \5 y& ]
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct% V! V; e1 j5 f& |4 j
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
; p+ p2 W. ~$ Tso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society, I( b$ O5 s* x  `9 _9 c( i; o
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
1 X2 y% Y2 K( g$ u, u! Z) vwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
- A) \& v! T8 u# [: Rso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!) Q. a: ]; b& A+ T( b
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
2 g" c# K; n# Q8 _政府想比下馬威0的人~~
" ~- ?0 P  B7 _, ^2 F  @0 S0 b錢就一定罰  C- j7 _- G/ O! |
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
, w1 {( k% a2 [0 k3 N唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?0 Z8 ?: M, {5 w6 x( v$ }. g
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
0 ], W. @$ f: ]! {到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。