<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)) R  H' x1 t- p; ^9 L  S( }, r2 d* P7 M
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:  s9 M* o0 C8 E  s$ ^
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
; m7 A1 i9 j) x; @. j- \4 R8 y2 \
I agree you points that it could be illegal4 c! F+ H5 }0 o
but that is still a "gray area"" S0 ?. W! V/ T" Y$ E; K1 x2 b: o) \
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair) l6 y: z2 s1 g+ F* h4 `
8 f1 l% y0 Z1 U" M4 T# ~
anyway, I want to say that is; ?( A# I- _9 p+ i  o
who is supposed to be protected by laws6 h$ D0 ?; ^! h' p
creators?
/ x0 b5 v/ j3 [, C; Nbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market% a/ E+ v5 m2 p3 `: @5 j, |
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.: }7 V. A5 y2 l+ J
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those$ E1 ?4 I) `4 x$ _
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:( Z1 p: n% C: y) Z
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
! g8 G! H! l* ^& ~2 n
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:8 x) Q2 f' r/ `: g& R; A/ \

! V- J# t9 i/ K5 S  B4 W我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
$ M5 C, o3 Y4 m7 V2 `  R唔係喎!
9 f0 z+ x) {, F& `) ?  m  [古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!6 a& N3 s# P' o# N5 p& }! N
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
& E( u+ I$ ^& G& F佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!! J4 l3 G/ k* u7 Z. v
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事; Q: R' {' d2 x3 ]
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!0 g# Q/ Z# ~: a) P- C
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......! b/ w/ g% a$ _9 Z; |
if so bad, dun download la, right?: R( J  i) B; c$ u) A  h
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
% V2 r( b# }# b! l! C( g( ]& B6 ~but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct  c  S* G, X$ O5 E
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
7 n0 P' |3 f) x' Bso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
2 d, S( [4 x5 M( Yusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
7 a3 B7 ^" X2 V0 C# ]- {' Pwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
1 O$ c0 u. i4 O6 N, O) {so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
8 h, m# f. d. Y' l2 R% N& l佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
7 Z0 L9 r# C* |( d6 l8 G3 t7 G政府想比下馬威0的人~~
) e* ?+ R8 I' K8 P錢就一定罰
8 [% K) |- I: Q未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
3 E3 k! b( C1 t. u! w唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?+ I- |; `1 S1 k+ l' z
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
$ X# w0 E, Z! _) a( Q# l8 V9 p到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。