史艷文2

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
# z& h# b7 L; r' \: R但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!

F.king

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:' z( c1 v) Z% v  y/ \( }% g
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...

/ d$ A/ K2 s2 X0 |1 i4 I! m
I agree you points that it could be illegal
' y6 c) v" _( m5 H) xbut that is still a "gray area"
& R/ E9 D3 X, C$ V2 B! z/ K1 Ewhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair0 Q( l9 T0 N" a( j
$ _, F, P5 w5 X+ ]3 e& K8 N5 x  p
anyway, I want to say that is4 l9 @1 M( H+ c; B) X( \( V3 p
who is supposed to be protected by laws
; z% \/ D5 x- Q/ k: h6 ecreators?
+ b6 l/ d3 G# q9 H: l% Sbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market! a  B/ U5 I$ B: ^" |6 U3 q0 k+ V
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money./ Z  P" s4 E: |- L$ t7 a
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
* R* }5 j3 R1 _: o5 p8 t" K( L& vWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???

junob04

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
# z2 @6 c3 Q1 h其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=

/ p/ a8 s) y* W9 d( ^7 F我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

HansChan

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
6 |0 A: _& s; r" H" U6 W- `! w8 t! z. L  c7 S
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

8 ?1 Z' ^  r  j# t
唔係喎!& o2 ~2 C2 w+ j+ ], S& E' s
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!* A3 s/ `- e6 A  ]
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!* g' G! U  t6 Y' w% O
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
$ n/ T( G$ m- J( [3 _4 g6 M就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!

大家樂1234

希望佢無事
& e& u" F7 q* A9 i+ @, W) u一有先例以後就死嚕

jason williams

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
, ~4 c/ L& w* @& r+ d& Z, M4 E$ I5 Ydun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
4 E4 J/ q/ U3 V' D* Qif so bad, dun download la, right?
) c7 L$ S, Y6 b/ M8 m5 m$ s3 X5 R3 hi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^# v$ t9 @6 \3 \0 W* a7 h6 y
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
! t1 U/ f$ V: ^6 o; e9 a/ I- W8 kno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
1 ~% F' F5 W" e* j& h: F1 l# Mso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
/ z# H1 S/ R  m. J: G# z$ G/ vusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
  d' ~# b& A4 R3 M, u6 r" V& U5 {why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!' D1 S& |' [0 G7 c- X$ U
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^

coolyiceman

罰款,冇留案底!
4 y# f; s( Z) J* P8 c3 E佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
6 ^4 ?# _2 e/ z; ?5 N政府想比下馬威0的人~~% l' z- {* m- }0 g( q9 \* S0 z
錢就一定罰: O1 d. Y% D% M2 ?& n
未必要坐牢~~

HansChan

如果真係判佢有罪,8 x' g0 z! \& e# s8 ?6 {/ }! s) W, g, e
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
$ v9 t% s. R% B; W4 y) a5 K! n1 n佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?4 W+ H' l, m  P0 ?$ F- R
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!

EV4886

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...

@bcc@

冇事!!!!!:cool: