<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)' s0 i0 V/ c1 d1 K6 @% x* o
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
. }/ x  a6 E' T9 T  Q- B( E4 z大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
# X2 m! t: n) c8 j6 f5 z% ^* m* @) F$ xI agree you points that it could be illegal
( v+ R# ]5 t3 v9 T' N' h+ r; k4 `but that is still a "gray area"# X  _4 S+ w- ~6 w
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair3 [/ a; G  L, Y/ E) Y" ^

1 q- B$ w  }  b3 i5 c8 P/ T% tanyway, I want to say that is; U, U' k+ I8 j! y
who is supposed to be protected by laws$ X( f# o# E2 k/ u5 t
creators?2 M4 S+ t% m  @0 {, O
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
) i. }1 D2 ~; E, ^& \) L5 ~let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money./ K! u% n/ b4 I% g8 N9 F- A1 f
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
( S. S! v7 V& k' Y% XWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:6 u$ s) O5 o$ q5 x
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
3 I2 L! _+ K) P" t
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
' z7 [5 c0 S9 D4 c9 T) M6 Z3 S6 c, i7 p
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
- T) V8 Y- C) Z. l! m9 }/ o& n
唔係喎!
3 b6 i4 n6 L* d* b/ v古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!# l% h% A6 c5 A
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
: S; Q6 C0 g) m佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
$ m1 x$ P, i8 G! \就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
+ w) x. D7 G' E7 k! t7 R# E* |一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!1 D9 |( W" p  s+ s  z- p0 g* T
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
3 c# k8 K5 m8 {: _3 V7 m- uif so bad, dun download la, right?- v( O2 \( P9 b. _& @
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
1 [& O4 g3 [( e; [7 _but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct$ o- m8 t$ \5 Y' o. k% d7 u/ I+ D; d! F
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la# n. p& F) B9 X6 ~
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
+ I. j5 E* R' ~! m0 {using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........& m' Q+ k! x" o
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
3 ]1 X7 c6 u( r/ x  T3 Jso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
, z- O) G' d# z" O2 i* I) ?佢又唔係殺人放火~~~  h9 Z( W, {; A% ^7 c8 T
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
* q* v( }$ K* \" A- y6 {8 E錢就一定罰
9 P& ?/ G2 Q# S* R7 J" t. q未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
1 K. h3 L( C" Z8 T! z唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
8 ?2 J- v% q$ k% v- r+ Z佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?  J) _7 m  V, ^
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。