<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)4 W8 |/ S. u! A+ Q' k7 e% j
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:: l' U( E! A% e$ s  S) l; h' t
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
& @6 B" d9 X4 j; C, c  \& d6 }6 W& N* u
I agree you points that it could be illegal
7 H  O- H* H8 c& Q/ Mbut that is still a "gray area"+ S- |0 ~2 i! V, W4 D" g
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
" d1 `2 Q. r5 ^! p' j2 N
9 R) ^+ z! q8 ~( p, {5 A; Janyway, I want to say that is0 Y. d/ q) W9 X) F% L" F
who is supposed to be protected by laws
4 X) K8 t  ~6 |0 l9 Ncreators?
4 t, e2 G- q. Y: o+ Ybut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market8 J5 J/ [$ Y  [7 ?0 p
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.5 Z6 n+ Z6 S9 Q+ R2 c8 L
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those2 ?! ~- G3 f; _& M$ I3 i
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
9 M, [) K$ ^: o) b/ M  t其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
+ v, a- m$ n9 p: I2 O我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
/ ^  {# x' Q9 A$ G
4 }' W: P2 z9 _5 ]我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
4 C( L3 C5 c: T0 [$ i+ n2 G唔係喎!5 h0 `. q5 W! x' \
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!4 I  l2 _. s: [
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!- e0 a0 P) }+ N* t' q5 {
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!0 ?; w- ]0 F. N! S8 y- n
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事6 Q+ n4 d( B* l7 k1 s
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
) G! a6 d$ H! O7 w% B9 odun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......* G5 n  d7 e1 c( I7 t. u7 {- g
if so bad, dun download la, right?
, q3 _+ }+ Q; v: r9 p2 ii am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
6 A, O# `3 }! y5 u! t5 Nbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
6 Z9 y6 F3 a  O4 b: i: D( |no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la3 G  E" F. K6 d
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
8 y% K7 ]/ R: B' c+ }using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema........./ s- M% @! J7 b! l- \
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
7 g. y! j( ?0 H5 Jso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!7 L3 k8 I, U/ L: q# a6 [, k
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
! U% i& y* J' Y6 O& Z7 W. `政府想比下馬威0的人~~
: C7 _- n/ o$ a6 G錢就一定罰
; v2 o9 x# e# U8 K  v未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
0 s* s% k; s  J2 k1 v唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?9 Q7 N( P6 y0 A
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?; a% _+ W% u, @! C& _, K
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。