<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)0 T4 L( {  e; o! Q1 z3 I
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:3 W: O+ n2 T! T  T3 n1 A
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
$ a' E- b+ ]1 O6 zI agree you points that it could be illegal9 F0 q7 u8 c9 H  e
but that is still a "gray area"4 ]" i2 z5 A# C5 h
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair( ~0 R7 `6 Y& t4 D! G: W) U2 l
( a8 o; c) f/ N; k# x
anyway, I want to say that is
( c: a8 d3 F8 _3 d( Jwho is supposed to be protected by laws, I8 j9 g. k  u, H) U
creators?6 s0 `( g) d3 @$ z+ f# u$ |
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market5 D9 C$ ]# R7 i  W: o
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.+ t, M8 y+ c( x2 D4 @. }7 P
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those) O, z3 r" U2 {9 \$ y+ y4 D
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
3 B3 r- F, Y$ R$ `# @3 m: V" O其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
$ i9 r# C7 n' {6 t. o( W, a
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:: s/ ^7 S. b) Q0 x6 J, Z
% l6 s: |: y' R1 i% d
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
0 l' p/ K2 `$ O唔係喎!
1 y" a# x0 s. M- ]古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
1 o" \: x+ L, e& H' X  ?2 n% E我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
$ X2 q6 L6 F7 T* x* `- W) b佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!+ i- B+ W6 s# W
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事2 e6 n6 C# s1 \
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!% Q) K& k8 {) o! S$ t! `" [* b# d
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face......., z4 a4 w6 @% S
if so bad, dun download la, right?' B- U7 [5 E* }2 }( b1 y# v
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^% S% K: Y( `4 g# N  r6 r
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
$ X+ F/ y# [" ?% Gno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la* H8 K0 i$ ~! F4 V2 b6 a+ h
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society: k+ ?% i8 \8 ?' x. w4 Q
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........  L/ @4 B0 i- }- r
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
2 }. g3 V6 X7 S' r7 U- \; [( }so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
5 F3 S* p, u9 U' \  ]! W' q佢又唔係殺人放火~~~3 t. L0 O8 F  H3 _" I# N
政府想比下馬威0的人~~& P& S' V/ u$ H6 R
錢就一定罰
8 a) b/ p+ [% Z未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
/ ]6 I$ S$ ?$ v7 }唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
) ]) x% N! y# \- b' O佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
/ c- k# @: g5 K, R! h到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。