<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
$ W$ X  ?2 v1 O3 F但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:  u6 g% [& S8 }2 H7 u
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
4 w3 Q; l- l$ w3 o
I agree you points that it could be illegal2 Q* q1 D# m5 h. _, q
but that is still a "gray area"9 a: Q9 [  n* y3 m& ^; @
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair2 P* D/ `7 ]! w9 r! E3 t
0 x8 l" X4 U7 _! r* O8 l* R
anyway, I want to say that is5 ^, C3 g$ c* n- u; n
who is supposed to be protected by laws
: I" c: S3 N0 Jcreators?
( W" o5 `  u8 c9 p1 s. n$ K4 T6 U, D) ibut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
. `% u% d- E' O! Tlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.1 Y9 _4 O/ S  Y# {: S; S
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those4 k7 S1 Y/ r7 V1 D
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
* V1 q8 @% q1 F) x" U其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
# _. ?/ E% s1 |我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:4 S# t3 U. O* K) P
4 _; f. Q' R. Z% Q8 n
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
5 e0 t! i; \: R0 k唔係喎!; b$ B2 V. d" ^; S/ |- W
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!1 H  }) E6 \4 p# D0 l
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!) s, `. a0 d7 r' T) ~% h& N
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
  \. v2 i  n0 ~3 Z5 L$ c0 g就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
+ @7 h, }/ A% X' u5 R! P% Z一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
' S& V3 L0 M, M/ wdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
8 d; w! y  X3 o, J, l7 Xif so bad, dun download la, right?
' H6 [! N  L) E  ri am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^! a2 X5 Y$ H5 ^1 v2 ^
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct4 v& v7 K* ]6 \) R, p
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
7 ?1 R1 N+ R  u; A4 Z+ a. B" k! @" L3 |/ tso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society$ e8 a0 |7 N# Q; A
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........1 g  f, ^2 Z1 a. C
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
) r: J( v9 k* N2 Y! Rso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
- C- J, J; o+ _6 V2 v佢又唔係殺人放火~~~6 i) R8 i- V4 }" C9 @4 S
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
/ m: N0 f1 h" D' b# U- i錢就一定罰) d( w$ q: K6 s0 C" r
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
1 u2 C* s/ B1 T; i. [5 K唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?) Q, w& |2 }: c1 y  {
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
7 B/ z' S2 e5 o% p到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。