<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)" F) T# Z  v+ b# u6 d
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
+ @, K4 x; k: ]( C大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
9 ?3 p; Z3 U( M5 b2 R
I agree you points that it could be illegal8 F2 E- W5 ?" r, g6 l: C
but that is still a "gray area"
; S1 Q3 I+ T1 Wwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair1 L( }6 Q. K. i# ~
: f8 r  i: M) ~3 E
anyway, I want to say that is
3 \$ L1 n( x+ `8 _1 N( owho is supposed to be protected by laws4 _) [# q  I! q6 A% r- w
creators?
( n: y  I" C9 Bbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
2 y; Q" O2 ]. B& [! klet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.+ k1 M" X$ h  _0 s/ v4 D- e* t
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those: L7 I( Y% ]& k1 A# I
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
4 K$ A0 p) l$ K( D/ D1 ], ]- H" y/ |其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
( c& ]/ `- L6 V. o2 ?
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:+ [' Y( q. B' |' a/ d1 U# k: H' J
$ O; g+ O8 X9 _' _$ s; O) t8 x
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
) K7 I7 B7 ^: O" I
唔係喎!
. V5 @* g, E8 z0 Z古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!/ L. ?; c! c+ |& [$ V3 C4 p
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
# i* X3 I2 Q. b8 c% ?佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
+ s/ w( x4 J  [5 G就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
/ t1 v! D. \  `一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
& Z4 L& Q3 m( edun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
5 g# w+ w3 I% V, n2 ]if so bad, dun download la, right?  \+ `5 e: @: _% O1 O% \4 n- @- i
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^. W3 @! v7 I5 d0 h; f
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
$ Z3 Q% \7 ]- |6 [5 Lno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
9 Q# C9 _$ p6 ]' |so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society; z) \6 Q) t$ K+ F6 O
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
$ f" N8 H3 M1 z) Lwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!5 {/ o5 D/ g/ r" ]. I' I
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!$ \4 |1 {8 c# }! p
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~+ B& Z. P( H) K! L/ @
政府想比下馬威0的人~~3 v; @* i9 f* C/ x8 D5 X
錢就一定罰! a7 Q, G, P9 _+ @9 A5 b! f9 e
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,! Q( L( ~: v- o6 B8 r, R
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?) j! Q7 T" b6 I1 k) w+ h5 L
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?( i& ]# z7 U& U
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。