<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)* n% d3 ]* A; H; ^; c  n- d. @. a: S
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
: N- V7 m. a! u0 K大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
$ X  M4 y/ F4 o7 n4 P
I agree you points that it could be illegal
/ b, M9 V3 V! g! C- Wbut that is still a "gray area"+ d- j# v+ o7 P$ E
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair- Z  l  X% G7 N1 j
. i' d  n, a" S
anyway, I want to say that is9 c: r- ~; G6 h  W6 w% _3 H: L
who is supposed to be protected by laws# b1 f" u% U% e  S
creators?& u9 M; K2 ?/ z- \
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
3 C- L. A( q. ~9 z' e5 Rlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.2 V0 A2 ?3 l0 b2 |  I
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those; m5 Y; d7 Z1 c/ G2 \
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
# O/ O5 g9 P2 u, _" i  _/ `. s* M1 U其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
6 K7 [' ^" D& s, p5 t
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:: b2 {- U$ T9 R  p

! b# k8 W" C: p) I1 O# r  \3 N我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
8 N9 ?8 Q# p. O! Z8 O唔係喎!) b5 E- ^  @8 T, R- @  w" u
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!) U4 U# S3 z4 P; X" S
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
: C6 n6 a) k$ c/ f6 z5 m佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!& k  F. @2 {$ I8 R
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事9 r, B$ M6 v# }  n- m
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
" ^9 \5 f! G0 A7 T  Kdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......6 z8 Z1 Q! D2 @0 M& e
if so bad, dun download la, right?
& b( w1 K. U& q) L& [i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
' o% q3 _) q3 `, {# O. {but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct8 R- C2 k/ m. P! }/ A' H8 N
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
1 S' f, V$ A( ^- _- Y. oso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
; A* P" Z& P  i; \" Gusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
0 B+ C6 I" |8 l( v% k0 nwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!" L0 a7 ~8 i* z# w4 J1 }
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
- v$ J7 J! Q# W& Z佢又唔係殺人放火~~~- W  Q2 @& Y& H7 [# n- y
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
. f* J8 |5 E$ I8 I# ^' P; H: k錢就一定罰
5 B/ o+ T$ _/ J3 D未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
  v: B( E% q+ k8 ]0 R) D, |7 b唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
$ n" S8 R% m4 t0 a. S佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
9 M  T0 k7 [% Q9 N到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。