<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)* A5 O" d  K( D5 U/ a% G* ?
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:7 |6 z6 B) X9 q* r2 P
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
8 d1 `9 k, K) J- DI agree you points that it could be illegal
7 i* O3 u: t3 }' Rbut that is still a "gray area"
( J. f- q; o0 E1 K5 ^whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair4 e5 v- u  K" M/ o" E/ A( ]' Q- v7 y

3 E% \; v# ^5 W0 K' u, [" V9 Ranyway, I want to say that is
: K4 n$ r( N3 lwho is supposed to be protected by laws* ^" r' G6 B( }/ ~" Y: ~) j
creators?: r( [; `* R" V3 i9 G, k* L% ?
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market( N$ b" O) |( R8 @5 g
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
9 V, ^, E; a0 J( B7 M: _' R  F2 t. Ywhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
  h1 x( E, k0 c- z) Z0 n2 cWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
9 }/ Q9 v( u& {$ N其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
7 s) ~; T' O$ A/ b! b: v) g, d
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:3 ~4 p0 M! A3 y. V

, o+ o4 ]4 s: M: a我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
7 B& l$ a0 I% ?0 I# F  D唔係喎!
9 K; q. @( r; R% V, E古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
& N2 p& l5 m' k5 y0 @我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
- t  N( M% R! |佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
8 M8 v& n9 `% b. n就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
# y$ f$ D) I, ~一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!0 S* p' s" t- V" S! s' l. A% K
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......$ A- R, }/ ^! R2 G% l4 h1 r8 z
if so bad, dun download la, right?7 E6 Q3 p* b1 |) ?- C8 k
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^* B& J, d$ _2 T0 j  j
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
1 K! @. d! l( N" k3 B  ^3 k4 Wno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la/ j; U, R* a2 k# y* |8 _5 F/ j0 o
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
8 m, d' x5 T" {0 H! t! W7 `using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........0 H5 {$ a- U* E( I& ^
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!  y  |$ W. Q- j8 S+ T
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
. U9 J2 y2 E, o佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
! j! p4 x3 b  I# J政府想比下馬威0的人~~% Q  Q2 c3 P3 Z
錢就一定罰
) \& ?2 F9 V3 i9 l6 Z9 e; R未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,( T7 L+ N/ Y  \- b5 }2 U( ^
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?+ D3 R4 |$ a/ @
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
( a* j9 r4 ?6 r到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。