<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大). c0 G$ @0 }8 T4 I7 d+ B
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:$ E; v+ a& U9 U
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
! ~2 B: l( `9 ]% `. E
I agree you points that it could be illegal
) ~" p: l" \. `( b6 Gbut that is still a "gray area"$ A, w6 v) z/ e, l
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair' |; N" ?2 a3 `1 ^1 t% n
- u8 H8 u2 A3 z, m3 A
anyway, I want to say that is7 x4 y: h/ Y7 K3 X
who is supposed to be protected by laws
- m4 N5 n' k- z, Y. |: g/ Dcreators?
8 Q6 k. q& i. G2 D1 Wbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
, O- M2 E5 |) j4 z. @# slet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.# J" I. c6 D1 i- m7 O
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those& ~& \8 f) L' Q
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
9 s2 F2 h) ^- ^0 }/ A其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
( T% L* t# k4 L$ q, }0 n
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
8 k8 T) M+ z$ m8 f+ F5 {; e- Q- s1 H( ?3 H4 c# ^: Q4 t5 V+ W5 H
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
, _5 k8 X9 K& W7 F. Z- |' R
唔係喎!
, j2 k2 l1 w) u1 a' s/ K古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!4 p; `' n& O6 ~2 t6 P7 \+ ?
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
3 ~5 o6 M- P* c佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!/ E& c: I* ]) m
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
2 U7 v7 X, b/ j$ C9 r2 }* W一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!! m6 J, E; ^3 K9 k
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......1 @/ d* ^/ P% ]! t# T, D7 \
if so bad, dun download la, right?. ~; {- C7 _+ h8 U1 ]7 K1 p
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
9 w( M5 @) U5 `( t- K' nbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct9 i( }' V1 G# ]+ a8 ?! f0 M
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
' \! p  ^* f3 I; M7 d( e* Rso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
: \! @$ w8 C9 r/ `/ r- Cusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema........., v% a3 A4 ~: l
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!% a2 c- g7 W; }7 ^, ]7 \
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
4 \5 r. }, ^' {* f佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
$ f* U1 }; A- c3 a% f/ a/ T政府想比下馬威0的人~~6 t" z; {+ w+ ~+ J
錢就一定罰: Q; z0 P4 ?7 w: I! o6 N/ X8 G" {
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,( W% y7 P# d' z& ]
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?" V9 U- G0 G7 x% h; T6 w
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?+ [0 e( E, `9 y
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。