<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
  d- E! b; y) ^' O5 }7 W0 f* [但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:1 h7 O& a, p+ |, Y
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
- F1 K9 G0 y2 x9 q; [4 d
I agree you points that it could be illegal
- o7 _( ^! b6 \4 Z2 J# a3 [1 ibut that is still a "gray area"( B! m% i- [& K9 U
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
' e2 F" D) ]' H' N+ E4 J. v7 M
/ P7 E7 a  J' O2 D1 y% f' a# T0 Janyway, I want to say that is
' |$ t7 j0 U# S! |who is supposed to be protected by laws$ x7 h# P- U7 F
creators?. r# r" O5 G6 A# o* ~5 Y
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
9 ?# e; |( b" E' p) Z0 llet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.) s8 S- [, }# z3 \* u1 j1 N
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
' R$ A7 d' K. F& L7 N* B$ PWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
, \6 G! F" v' @其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
9 f# L7 H! n+ ?7 `/ o4 h+ ]我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
0 u! K( s  M1 y- Y
' H2 W1 ~" @8 T) e我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
5 v* e" s& m- u$ n5 {  A. u: k唔係喎!
' W1 {! ~/ V' N+ r0 Z& T/ q古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
+ _8 I6 M7 a1 ]8 v9 X+ ]我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
8 n7 n) a% Z2 Y' {! _! ~佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!- }8 F' w0 O% t/ h, e: f7 _9 H  S  @
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
, c+ e2 H. k9 n' m' I4 H8 Q% T7 w一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
9 F) V" A1 g2 O4 e1 Y. g- O0 }dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face........ y4 Q* K2 ]/ ^; O$ z9 `
if so bad, dun download la, right?
  }# g& D( Q4 o& }8 b* [0 ui am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^; l' y- R: ?0 p
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct( h. C3 r4 \' m
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
4 ]7 E; z0 {# v2 {$ z) `: tso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society% C2 B% y3 |* c$ @/ o
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........9 u& r) D' W: E6 q# Q0 @& n5 y' X
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!: {9 L) Z% A, g, u: H
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!) y% u) d; p5 ~5 W
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
* z1 l! p# k* M政府想比下馬威0的人~~* t5 A. C* N2 l6 j% Y6 @' Q
錢就一定罰
) X: V7 M& u0 J, F# f未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
( {$ d! w- @0 I3 q' v& _2 @唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
, W" i5 c! e' A+ ?佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?0 p+ a+ Z1 F, m+ d7 J
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。