<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
4 F* R4 t  |" h9 B) `/ Q, Z1 K但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
' G# I: g$ T& \- P' d大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
2 n4 A" ?; E+ V# q8 c/ ?! O
I agree you points that it could be illegal7 M& z; a5 M; Y( m9 A, j3 P
but that is still a "gray area"
, K$ }/ o5 y( L# W$ c0 B0 i+ w/ X+ p* Dwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair6 _$ |3 C$ K5 A

/ o, Y/ _2 X+ @' U) [anyway, I want to say that is# U& |! _: T, u, U& ^& E* J- C( ]" S
who is supposed to be protected by laws
; A, F8 F% L7 `8 Ocreators?
, N9 r% Q& r% Y4 h9 s% m: qbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market3 I3 D! t- m$ r4 q( B$ K# P
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money." ?: i5 H0 y' v# ?" G2 @0 J
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
3 j& d& D/ E. F9 ^! {9 bWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
" a  s, s+ I. v) U# w& A其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
: Q( z, b" W' Q* J: M
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:& o: u* F. ^% c" \
3 E- B: ^( q* s1 ]* Q( n
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
# }$ [0 w9 s: W3 `
唔係喎!
& a% S5 x9 U( U7 ?+ r* j8 Y6 ^- `古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
9 D1 U5 G$ ?1 D. h. [我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!( K) O" M7 G, p- G, b( X9 k% o
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!1 v" Q5 W( U( K2 Q7 ~
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
% T# ?6 f* u2 U( S! V一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
# j# i8 m- q* ]) H1 Z/ D. _dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......+ B: r6 o9 C9 e5 \& d
if so bad, dun download la, right?
0 w" r1 R2 D& C* [i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^- z" T3 Z! m5 B& a+ K$ d+ }
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
' i- n: {; K. c& A1 j9 Z" `no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la- g- ~& Z1 J0 I5 N
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
5 J& s0 Z" Z7 ?& musing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........1 }6 Z3 ]- ^9 {" p  O! I, T( d
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!: P+ _: F& S; j4 R) t
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!6 u0 M3 [- F0 V% i
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~/ \, E0 z) }8 \. ?; t1 w- ?) f
政府想比下馬威0的人~~' f9 T9 \0 x" @4 y
錢就一定罰
3 J* B) c. w9 V未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
$ `% e# E' t- U9 d唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?! t, l% J/ A& d8 X1 G
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
" m2 N' h( d4 e: E9 P到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。