<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
; Y$ P% Q  |2 X$ K$ n3 o6 Q但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
& k9 X) n/ V$ }& S8 V8 N9 \' T1 J/ ^大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
$ G! b7 [9 O7 C" \% g& E1 u9 `3 ^
I agree you points that it could be illegal
# q- z) n' b, m& l& Jbut that is still a "gray area"$ f; Z% t4 J% s) P; e, {, z& }
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair& ^' y. O. D: R" K7 u7 H5 j

1 i* @# ?* i4 ]9 O5 Aanyway, I want to say that is
' ^. ~" m& F% X5 |2 D$ Qwho is supposed to be protected by laws, }! X% U1 q2 t
creators?1 [# N" p! A" x/ E/ O
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
( C0 c1 C" Y4 l* V" V: p# Plet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
" L$ J0 _* h5 S" ?4 G7 Iwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those  ]. }5 \9 ?) v% }# X/ h: y
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:! ?0 i: E% R7 d0 a& |1 J; t
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
9 B/ A8 s" |6 `2 t9 l- \0 w! y% u# l我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
- i" o' R# S  E( A4 k$ U
5 c% L8 o+ U3 I+ W0 \我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
4 [  e6 u; B, B# D2 n唔係喎!
1 `% ^( t/ ~; u1 R9 g古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
: Y! W1 p) B  S- Z! Z6 N我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!) f  k8 q- @2 A) }) ^  b- P
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
6 l  Q4 ^  |' g就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
0 J# j" P7 h6 r- [: Y2 h一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!1 E  V# K( J; V8 P! Q
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......! A9 c* D, @8 p3 }( x6 j2 I  x
if so bad, dun download la, right?, P- E+ B2 I# b, ~" R8 `, i
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
2 g; f( T, o' I' |& Mbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct* n) j4 B' `; U1 G6 J
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
" T$ D3 u" ~1 v; mso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
+ X  u. g: B. X" d6 B& ?9 iusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
9 `! T  z& w* d' H$ Pwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!! E. B) e3 B+ _' S7 w  X) V
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
5 \- A* U8 K; _佢又唔係殺人放火~~~; N- Q. T# `* V, M, m
政府想比下馬威0的人~~! u% Y. Y/ W3 q2 ~( [$ }
錢就一定罰9 _3 B; z  W" s& D9 C8 ^9 a
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,' ]+ w+ p4 x  r0 w
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?9 x: F5 O$ ]6 Q1 D" o" o- N! I0 _
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?' M( z/ |2 \, \
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。