<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)4 W% m" v% A: _8 P) H$ ^. j
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:' D' ]" o% W+ {0 P0 Y6 A8 `2 }) d3 O
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
5 }3 m$ W  U: j% b6 i. R9 Q
I agree you points that it could be illegal- F, P; j% I# {% e1 b& d- k9 S7 D/ u
but that is still a "gray area"7 ^0 {6 ?0 d3 L7 U- [, h
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair6 j% ]4 J4 m8 p* {/ _% V

& v4 g# ]2 F1 s4 v, X2 Ranyway, I want to say that is1 j! R6 S, k; E6 v6 f  k- P& F
who is supposed to be protected by laws* n& @2 [; u6 E9 D% o: l2 O5 {2 ?
creators?
% g! N+ Y# o1 D4 jbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
4 i6 C" g( d9 a7 k3 \& k2 w  s, `/ qlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
$ l6 \5 E% p+ t0 _, f! v4 x# o" ~when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those* X* ]8 d8 I# \+ |# n
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:" r' ]/ s. F) l" H) I2 q4 A
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
; {3 P. V! y7 S# x
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:4 Y6 d" i) V# S

; Y- c0 [1 n# Z1 I! H我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
* w2 B" M# m% T0 X2 {. A
唔係喎!
  Y% O) u- Z+ k/ R. ^9 i8 m: C古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
6 m& b; t. }( j; u我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!7 g# {& h8 @1 d. \
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!) E" O9 A( Q' o
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事) f9 I# |# D& p% t* s4 H0 L( U
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!6 I7 z& x, a- ^) r
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
$ V$ S0 L6 w  I- I* Iif so bad, dun download la, right?
5 e! j" K: j) t6 e. C8 ?+ Y7 ?i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
7 `, @! E( {  q7 C$ nbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
4 q3 [) M5 q! l" @4 F9 i- lno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
$ u1 S/ M& p  a7 N0 t) H/ Gso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society- }  u3 m! E0 c  r" f
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........3 r* c/ [3 h1 Z
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!- B+ u2 U5 Z0 N' s- a
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!! ]& B4 L" j* G' n, C' @2 K3 j) j6 ?
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~' u* N% T' r( I, D
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
# r  ]9 y7 W- \) F錢就一定罰' _0 I. e) a1 [3 H( ^/ Q
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
# y6 ]& F+ \2 D8 n* f唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
) C3 ^  o; n. `2 L7 p$ N% N佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?) G$ k1 Y% E4 [  z
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。