史艷文2

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)7 N! ]" u8 w$ _9 m* E3 Z
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!

F.king

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
6 k9 q& g3 d- ~& E# \% n. `$ r8 z大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...

; r" a$ F8 |% g
I agree you points that it could be illegal$ E/ y# f! ^* T- k
but that is still a "gray area"
& M, u; b& b& V" \2 Owhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair; t6 h/ \& b2 T4 w- K  s
8 i# ]# _. l" {/ x
anyway, I want to say that is
- e. b* \0 k; N( s* lwho is supposed to be protected by laws
0 M$ j! x' y% n& dcreators?
. s2 s4 v. ]( C  u% @' p! A  Rbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market5 \6 A2 ~9 C* `& G+ m' T8 ~
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
" ~2 K* k4 W( F- q* J- m% twhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those/ z; j) u" C; i" d, d+ u
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???

junob04

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:1 k7 `# K, W* [! N) K' |
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=

$ I4 h& }& y3 I, F3 O4 l% Q% f6 c0 |
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

HansChan

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
% l$ R3 z- h% h  n' j% C
$ z* B% S: f; ?% X$ D我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

: d7 n) T+ S4 m2 g% [唔係喎!- `' l! s: B/ w3 D& s- X9 S) u
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!7 y! X9 k2 W# `' l$ ^- R
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
$ h2 c! t; N1 R  @' E佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
. @# r5 }- ?+ Z7 b  X" m就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!

大家樂1234

希望佢無事4 P+ |+ `- ]9 ]9 |; [' @* q
一有先例以後就死嚕

jason williams

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
( K9 \2 E; c3 N8 J* b, n3 Wdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
& v0 m/ `. ?  R0 v! ?if so bad, dun download la, right?8 `+ y  @6 b  X0 W& ~4 Z
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
; M, D- `" ], k3 Y" `; `8 \' bbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
7 G3 I5 m' F* \7 Z4 `2 ^: ^* G, L# rno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la& ]8 z" z  Z7 _, N5 E
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
# K$ w$ a+ X- w8 W) n5 \. gusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........8 L5 B+ w3 {: I) u9 r4 F' c3 E
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!9 U8 [+ x5 O7 d7 g$ _
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^

coolyiceman

罰款,冇留案底!4 }$ i7 E  y9 n2 E, w( H
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~2 V8 W6 t  {1 _* P1 e
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
3 {8 E5 n- x* `  T* d; n錢就一定罰
" w' \9 ?1 r; b; o/ p未必要坐牢~~

HansChan

如果真係判佢有罪,
( M: y! f/ L2 A1 V) U9 X7 P唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?. a+ F3 Q3 {8 C) ]+ e1 w
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?6 J" v' y$ G; Q# g* \4 }
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!

EV4886

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...

@bcc@

冇事!!!!!:cool: