<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)4 j, h* ?" V" L9 u4 C5 x8 Q% N- Y6 Q
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:- J4 g$ m4 A, y. N( x# _1 Z" ~' Z* Q# H
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
; ?0 V/ u; z2 p1 ^6 y/ rI agree you points that it could be illegal
) S9 ?9 B* F: {5 m- v$ N! vbut that is still a "gray area"
$ t2 C4 l* X- e2 Q9 U9 [5 Owhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair4 {( Y5 k: `; y8 r# n0 d  |
# x& y/ P( v  Z4 }# W2 p0 h
anyway, I want to say that is: o" ?2 o0 |' s6 u! Y
who is supposed to be protected by laws  D& R4 r4 r/ T; J
creators?
. [* D* D$ G( e+ K" ?2 T6 Q# Zbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
) F; ]1 I  g, R) L) _; u/ Dlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
: ]" s9 {# m  k' O; e9 Y$ r+ V" g0 x8 U2 ^when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
' w& F* W3 b+ a$ A4 x, ~! aWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:5 W5 }9 K) i- @0 @7 z$ A
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
( C0 e2 f" }  C. M我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:! b' X" i, Z7 w/ U5 ?+ g" \2 E8 G
( T  A' |% Y5 R# N" c) N
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
) }! G/ e" Y( O2 h0 Q' D唔係喎!: d$ m3 E( d; ]5 X" E: M7 o5 I" x
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
, U5 P) S- t( R: V/ l/ i; z我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!& C2 S7 Z; o4 s% K! k- K  b
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
' D& O% X6 n8 p0 y' ^就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
: A+ f5 Z) u' U+ s一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!2 M' c: I% u: V% n
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......; E" f2 C3 o% S& `0 ^0 j/ ^+ Y
if so bad, dun download la, right?8 F  A/ {6 |7 T0 r; t, v7 c7 R
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^7 f7 F. V" J2 Q: ]5 J/ H
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
( U- N; d% x5 r0 a% t# H, jno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la5 t2 I/ o7 r3 R9 F, S  W+ ^  a- f
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
2 ?/ `, H2 |& @9 k) j' X; e( s" gusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........- n/ f' u/ \  N
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
+ ?0 u& _& r: ?so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!1 X1 e% c' C3 X) w4 w0 s
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
8 C3 ^. _/ g* B3 g7 j. t2 y0 m政府想比下馬威0的人~~1 v' Y/ b/ }: h# W4 H
錢就一定罰
5 f. A" e; C2 ?$ ~6 i9 F; m未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,- K2 m' R$ Q) b. n. d' `0 k+ e, G
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
( m: c/ N! \# X( r8 K" s佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?2 ]3 g3 c% ]- W+ m7 A" _
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。