<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大), M8 ?2 H) \* \4 A: }2 W, k& A
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
7 n; G. Y( U2 G. ^* r, P. ?大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
0 S* u; I: T: {I agree you points that it could be illegal
9 ?6 R7 s. q8 K  Hbut that is still a "gray area"
9 l6 n2 \' }  G" \$ Wwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
8 s, Y8 M9 H  p/ o% }; K( c' j* B1 v( ?5 H
anyway, I want to say that is
! A- T7 s+ H; {who is supposed to be protected by laws4 \  W9 f/ H7 `% L) c7 d
creators?0 v- Y) Z" l' S6 K% `2 d
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
( Z" w5 X! X8 X% f5 B9 q% wlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
  D/ {4 l! v2 D' x- q+ iwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those2 H7 p- n. [( k  x3 l
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
8 n/ P! X* U0 `( n8 j其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
3 q- v! {3 Q8 c我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:+ V% R. u8 n3 M- d  V* ?8 K

! U2 u% N8 ]5 }; D% ]我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
5 I8 l5 b; v% F) v唔係喎!
+ a3 T1 o  N% u3 I) a" _古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!5 k0 p" y( Y) _" h+ A# Q! l8 `3 \" ?
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
7 R5 A/ s/ h# z2 F9 Q+ \佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!6 Y! T9 p: H0 c! q
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
, ?) }; e) n3 T- G' C" _一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!+ C1 q' T& I; A8 j; g. U' z. B) g
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
2 D5 I# L, f5 ]/ W* F) D+ E7 Kif so bad, dun download la, right?
7 H* n% n/ t4 m2 t1 ^i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^$ ?# i: i  }: }( L# L% f2 V
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct; T# U' W  @  @; y- K
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la& M& j/ S5 z* R& {' j
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
( z- W6 |2 Q. I8 b8 K/ _using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema........./ z' A) n; J7 E1 Z, @2 O
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
- t4 Q4 [5 V6 r2 G, e8 Qso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
2 J! |3 p! u# [4 T佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
6 X; O4 C& q8 i0 T9 _政府想比下馬威0的人~~0 E4 r: a4 F- h) B- j
錢就一定罰
, ~- W, f" g; I, G  k/ R未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
: W8 P8 s2 Q+ @- u唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
. z4 w* U4 }9 T佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?1 n. ~8 t+ N: c  c7 p1 D9 G
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。