<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)$ Y6 c5 A0 t' Y  n9 q
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
) _5 w# t: Z1 ~' \- T/ N大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
+ M1 O; M5 c9 O, i; {/ S" Q* V4 c+ ?I agree you points that it could be illegal1 B! s' m" a- Y* S" {8 W
but that is still a "gray area"
( s& @7 q: z3 K9 ^0 d/ {; ~4 ~whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
- e5 ?, v" f! S" y9 ~5 k
1 c; {( A4 z  d  s8 n. x! l" B& Sanyway, I want to say that is
* k- s* W9 k& N/ P- w  Mwho is supposed to be protected by laws
! u3 X& M9 b( R; F: B- lcreators?2 h) d4 b( E) H( N! f/ @8 d/ D
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
( _: G  w' m' _7 W5 a3 ~+ xlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.1 o2 H' S2 C5 `( F7 a
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
8 G5 K  J0 x9 ~1 h- s; V0 AWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
( B/ m: K9 e: n0 {2 F  R" ~其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
8 h' e; U3 x% r
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:% x! L) C: m8 v1 {3 |

/ A$ u# a) h' g( s) k. U8 ?我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
  m, @) w5 \* S6 J9 c3 l/ k
唔係喎!
" `8 G) E9 w9 b  F1 t/ X古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!  U! k. s, B' a" ~& P# G
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
- G( N/ V1 p1 b* Q佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
& d5 i. u0 J7 c就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
( T$ \# f8 a1 Z  L一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
  ?  U+ s' r9 \dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
* a. c. x; x& Kif so bad, dun download la, right?: R" e1 |# P, C- ?7 N
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
  ]7 s7 W4 l) g# z( g! ]5 f, ]but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct  y+ D$ z& A' Z, |! N& h5 T8 N4 Q( q
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
8 |( P& J8 n+ q- Eso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society. g7 w; I2 M5 u3 J
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
& r1 O6 A' b" s9 R" Vwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
! q( }0 m' y4 b+ f: y# x( Lso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!& l0 A3 D5 W* W4 b! i2 u
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~) M4 _! c3 J# F) s2 y5 A. \
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
  b9 [. f3 c9 L. E6 z! u錢就一定罰
  V' v1 ^% _) r% \. P未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
9 \8 u# S5 }7 w0 ^- `* e唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?6 x5 |# r0 Z2 S3 Q* S
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?! [. U: {9 {$ y) _, x5 p
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。