Rika

由最好排到最壞
& B0 g2 }( Y, d* j4 W/ ?F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
! I5 U5 s* h' hB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
% g. W# H$ L" J) x4 WS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her/ x5 t3 L/ k/ ^" u  w8 G6 @, u4 ?
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure% Y- L7 \7 e9 p9 f8 v1 h3 M7 y7 F
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:/ l$ D, v" P) z. ^* x

2 j7 E" b/ b# f% sM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人0 f* \+ J1 C: Y

/ E- A5 d& }( h8 q3 O2 |0 s8 VS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
! Q: d; F8 t2 X2 _$ `2 R     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
* n9 S7 M3 a, G0 b0 `# Y4 t; _  H% _
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做& h, ]6 H/ B# B& S4 a6 q

' t" `; m  I- D2 e4 PL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志  L5 [  U4 i. s* P* s
/ B3 |  z4 W# j; {) s. h+ O
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
, l8 a! |8 W# W% v2 e     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好. T* C# R9 Q' c2 }8 w
* Z* ]2 j. S8 Y1 E! x' f$ a! Z
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案/ \7 D: H) S- c$ K! J, V% `
而家答多次
; I5 K# n! f  ]% @( i3 if: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽% n1 _% |6 y; r/ a, K" }" a
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架6 h6 N- ?& w9 g; w: x# ^
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢- T' q7 g6 P7 V, a/ q% l5 o+ U
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
2 [$ U1 i5 s$ l4 hm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S" p" ^, ~8 H, _+ b
8 X# O9 i8 Z0 Y7 o) ]  S
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
$ p( Z7 _! X8 l$ a8 ~1 {7 {F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
7 J' z2 ~4 ^4 v, N7 Z) T9 h- k6 OM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒# @, W9 T$ [0 l% y4 r
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢3 Z$ M( w% Z: M# t4 c) k+ i& g
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
1 s' \# E0 s7 b! dF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
5 g* J# F, ]' k+ E3 V& f- E+ vS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取4 D+ A. R5 B% T% h! V
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法+ ^: X7 Z- G6 F; M0 U7 m' A
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果$ K! t; m, p5 L9 G; d8 @& p2 @5 R
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
1 B' u" E: Q" u5 V! {7 `+ r* q& o% ^$ i8 m6 A  ]
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
. \; k, c; a: C/ ?7 z( r' _L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
/ u' `9 K& d9 gB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘. s) Y9 Z" j/ o  T
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
0 b5 Z0 H8 l: w5 c1 c6 F$ ~& GF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
4 b8 y+ N3 ]: W2 g( s1 }; d& [M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

! ]3 c( V& p) c7 X# g! k' s0 j/ {- ?0 c- \& g
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
0 y5 Y! A9 A7 M6 p3 v* x" _
- @& u# G4 a* g9 Y7 [; b" oB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  4 r5 u: M. [% X
6 k6 B1 Z% O" Q1 J. \; I  Q
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 ); F2 y& z1 `" c: K2 w5 U

9 _! B% M5 I' n3 F/ `3 f! ^F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome , ^' A8 @3 X8 u& x
7 e! V, X# \% x9 n  F  Y5 Q  ]2 l2 I$ O
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
% Q, F6 L9 `. I# W4 g" ?& P, g7 [; D5 e. @1 A' y
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge9 r0 j8 b$ I6 z
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
8 s, n3 z( g0 H" CL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點6 H6 ~' K5 R; c6 E" O; M, {' F
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
  ]+ a3 \+ ?% I+ e+ e/ G
6 W& r6 P* Y4 U. X- Q# ~" t  H最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
, m# {* F" z( D5 p2 m$ _# a有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，$ W+ b: X% u3 a$ @: q) g5 x6 |3 H
由最好開始排起既話，* y. [) ]5 y+ a! I
L B M F S 啦，
8 P- |. P( p4 I- M' I7 p8 l
( D6 d0 f. o3 L* B8 [2 z' G' ^其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，; f- c- K: ~5 z* k
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
+ x9 }6 O  m6 X0 A如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
# W5 o' N9 Q# j3 G1 j9 {又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
* `) Q- x3 O" Q& V+ y( I# i# z2 }' E8 {+ k0 V$ E% e  J
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
2 c9 K4 y7 f$ Q4 p; R所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，  g3 C- g8 I( a5 X  |" x- \
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。# t( t3 b! n2 L; \

$ N2 M# ^* U% p: Y' `2 `: }而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
4 G! ^+ V; q0 P9 Q0 X$ K/ k M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，7 J% s. o8 W$ q
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
) G. L+ h* e# J7 O知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，- L! `& A- K0 o
M 都可算壞了。
; l4 ~- q/ R! J/ l0 y- W
5 [5 C$ h. j8 t, }5 s, b$ Z F 呢個人仲掂，0 m5 @2 R. O+ P- y0 B
知道既唔等於要講，+ f* L1 Y, V) I: k2 _  U! x) L1 d
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
+ Y; J) F& b6 F' Y我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。8 i. u% [  Q; y7 c
, B7 ?9 F; y, S8 Z9 \/ i; ~
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
$ ]9 p" }1 u3 v/ }, ~始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
' {8 l, ~9 n" z. J0 @, P  C9 M. p- V5 l
0 |1 v8 ^0 n# `5 ^2 _: }. T

8 I% O# r1 t7 @" m5 e  K題外話：
$ t" \, q. X7 G( _! o唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，. u$ ]# H/ ^5 R, T) w
睇到 S 呢條友，
: U3 q1 p# W0 x% c$ {7 y我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L5 _, x' b* [/ m& Y5 |6 u' a6 A+ e3 I
- S7 b% C- v( s# m
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!- z  U, r+ B. @) x5 l: D" p1 y
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
2 Y- p' b3 T% q$ c# y: C9 P" [4 V; PM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
2 K7 o+ n( D9 q' a7 T$ qB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
4 r7 x- R! u. ?1 A2 NL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...