Rika

由最好排到最壞
/ i$ n1 r! w6 E& R. C9 X+ x+ \, WF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
5 y6 ~$ \0 ^' R+ u  B4 U& j* yB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
; P$ c* C9 V/ ], C5 g# g2 YS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her9 t( \; R& m( l( S
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
5 Q1 O  |: w, l9 z$ k% kL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
5 l/ T0 e6 ~9 `8 ^5 @$ X" b. z. o# i) L4 Z. S0 x8 J
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人: f& `  ]1 F4 @
& Y; v; G3 T7 g7 n
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
/ h1 w" a, R9 A/ G8 `1 u' {( f     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!/ N% T$ X! f8 ~  j+ b6 I

6 C$ J/ _3 ^6 f( LB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做$ e. S0 ?( x. V7 a# E7 P$ [

# x5 ?; Z" C3 p4 x2 F3 k) E1 vL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志! z( ]: ^$ v% v6 {; w
% m: E2 U+ i; \7 C  Q' I2 y) L, _
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,) a6 {, H/ s5 _6 L' u4 o6 ^# C
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
$ }( K: G" y' Q$ F9 S$ t! s0 @. T9 Z  y  o3 C
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案5 w# t" O+ A' f$ e7 J
而家答多次  ]1 S) f6 k7 d1 u% T; ]" N! t
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
# T' W4 e( a' r7 E5 P6 gl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
+ P. L, A/ P, l9 I5 A' R! w, C* ?! pb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
8 f- S8 }  y+ d# x$ l* Z5 Ts: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.- F4 d4 f: l+ h" n4 d
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S8 E! D  R) N$ a* H& q
0 u8 L7 V% U0 ]. a& L
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
6 _3 C  r# D% H7 d: d2 IF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度# q6 I1 Y2 ?0 Y" Z; r# i
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
) S9 j, L$ K/ J/ n0 w# F) p* ]S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
: r$ y( f/ h, b. `3 g! sB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
& E  n1 W  c* F( {( mF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"! D6 v# D1 `) J. B  l' f, Y8 K" L
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取* a1 p0 `4 T+ A
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
# A( d$ R5 \. @, v' YL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
9 y0 C/ P) }+ R  @. R% C, @  u0 mB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情7 [: ]9 f9 k0 V% G$ t+ ~. {" _& D
9 V9 p- b! X9 y+ y1 V
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:  o: f. h. C: T2 x3 g
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
6 l  m1 r. B0 E3 `0 j! b8 _B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘- @4 h2 j6 }$ t2 B
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件9 D. R, o* S$ D& P" r0 T" `/ w
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
* k7 u3 r; g7 L" A! MM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

, ]$ C0 {# w. C+ M5 P
+ {9 |8 m+ X% N5 @* }$ K( J same choices with u , but want to add some comments ; R) \% c0 Q7 K) y1 _, y5 L
1 ~/ v0 u) Q  _. D4 o0 S
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
$ x7 S; ]0 m8 K; E: H+ n4 Z0 ^( O
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
' p- o, k( L/ Z3 v" J
+ n! P; j: }" WF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome ( l* q% X- j2 T% c/ L0 T+ Q

# ]8 ]; g( _9 k1 mM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
, t5 B- q$ {0 G6 Q* D- r+ ?% ?" V
$ v: w& l( Z  r; n+ A) `! P[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge- l, y+ f& X4 Q
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
2 z4 ]- ~5 Q7 bL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
" ?" F; j* `7 P& ^/ FF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
) G0 [4 e8 h9 [% i1 ^! Z8 c* i& s" {/ M: |" V* p
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
2 K0 I; {# T! Q5 v2 i5 m有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，: O$ [, |0 {, ~: i* R5 B  z
由最好開始排起既話，
2 K9 T/ Z, R! M4 I% WL B M F S 啦，
1 b8 a/ e$ P3 h! ?& ]# o# w
9 G6 j- }& V# o2 H3 A1 [% o) H' d6 Q$ h其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，( J. \& l5 d- {! B" l9 f
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？5 \3 D) {$ {! y. j
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？4 z: g0 U+ H* q% E, |& g4 ^
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。1 o3 b7 \( U8 l
5 a. ^% g% v6 S1 x7 @/ d; k1 W
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，* D4 V) h! j) Q: @# r- m$ @6 K
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
) [" L! y& c& D0 F明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
( l/ S8 Y2 v2 O' q  l* ~6 J' `
/ `  ?; c$ ~, T0 ]; Q而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
$ b# ?! M9 O! I3 o3 } M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
  C6 u* Z, M$ i( z亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，; F5 Z% G" Q" k9 M! Z2 q
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
9 X! n' Y6 ^1 [+ c% [ M 都可算壞了。
6 K  o( N; s& x5 B7 d3 D8 d  C( h/ d3 x4 c+ ^1 Z2 S. `
F 呢個人仲掂，
9 u" v' A7 K! p% E$ q& ~% ]知道既唔等於要講，( m$ b1 S* S) D' ?) R# u+ l& w% P
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，8 o7 V" x9 t( b1 c; U
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。8 r3 W* F8 R2 N
& u$ w1 `$ P" t8 z: u/ x
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
, x8 }, A% C& N. G6 g始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。) i" C" x  E  b) R3 [7 D! w8 T

) l& Q5 l' _/ g! K  l1 c9 C4 n, z' m2 E% N  C7 F) D

/ ^- P, {/ Z3 v2 `6 T$ X題外話：- Z5 b2 M8 p$ v) e
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
! B3 o9 |' [' x7 k; R: U睇到 S 呢條友，: V" }  L: E2 C5 m
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L4 `/ r+ e" w+ w% _* a6 U% C% @# K7 ?
  h$ G. X4 B2 J
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
* b: c! I9 F0 r4 }8 m9 BF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
9 ~7 d. c% g( E; Q' ]+ E  X" FM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她1 i$ b/ k8 a2 o$ b2 L1 J3 l
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
% \0 m# K5 H! ZL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...