Rika

由最好排到最壞4 _6 e' e' `7 z
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
/ j: z* u2 D9 W1 i0 x  X& l7 n8 PB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount# O) m# y! y4 v1 B' H& V
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
* I0 }* b+ K2 s* r/ ZM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
+ L8 w. e% A1 z7 G7 ]L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:1 [( P1 \: ^+ M% a9 J% N, [+ t
  s1 n) P  N) X# j( P- F" ~! n7 ]  M
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人3 |7 n+ f; b$ k+ R3 _
. D! o9 J9 @. B8 r- v% r  G. F
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)" V7 F7 K* ?/ F/ A5 A1 R; u
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
; [3 a9 R# k' t8 {
& Q% w! l5 y3 t) bB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做+ s) S, v- p! r/ ^# B! o5 `1 }1 V
+ |, Z- O8 m5 i3 n$ Q
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
, V; x; \* |1 V* i
: ^9 k* z+ \3 P- ?7 t% nF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
" M2 s1 j; A8 ]     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好# ]0 [4 k2 d8 x6 L$ Q) n
. t5 q) S# |6 P* ]
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
# @: c) I) ?: F( a* o, y) ^: M而家答多次
- G( Z2 Y, h5 O7 S9 |+ qf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
8 P7 z/ h6 x9 n- D# Y9 pl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架+ e; }4 K5 r6 g1 j1 r/ G8 m
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢$ @8 R% \* P% v5 j% i3 D& B1 f+ c
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.& I5 F# Z. _! l0 A' y  Y
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
! ]0 I* i# E* s* v  w3 [( E8 e6 v  N7 m# Y7 E1 K$ ]
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
+ T" b7 D5 Z, T/ jF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
/ Y2 ]0 L% a" t  h# G4 @M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒0 q! M; F/ p1 w" L
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢/ L. y: n5 A1 A
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
; h, o, f- x4 m) y! n  `F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"& m- v3 N1 }' G" `$ B- s; c
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
1 }/ O1 a) X9 q$ KM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法5 N9 X1 O2 M! {7 O' z
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果. N' g# F, ]; i! r3 V
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
+ g3 ]8 @& S2 `$ {" B# ^+ w1 }+ y5 n) ^+ S
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
. B" z: y/ w' `3 P! ~L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己( Z7 Q9 X9 E! J" \5 j, L2 J
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘# R. A3 N; K  a: `
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
0 W6 O$ v+ c0 N/ r5 a) SF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
' o! w4 [- g0 J! O8 y- t4 H- }M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

8 ?$ ]) S1 O2 P. l/ v$ K5 R" {
4 E( ?6 r$ M7 a6 T
same choices with u , but want to add some comments ) G- c7 Z% a& f/ x( r) L, i. ]$ f" [- j

3 W9 ?% t7 \6 ]. y" Y- u$ \7 Y3 YB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  # h0 B  X) E! g$ ~# w: h: q1 T

1 B& g5 m" S# K+ Y/ o) fS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
, \: {$ _% L% Q0 n# n7 e- _- r5 u( x" m3 e0 l! Y7 J& j
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 7 n. D% }* l, m: \4 m
( b/ m! q1 x$ F/ l( D9 I0 |
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......1 U0 _7 z, _# h
9 ?5 M* ~" G! e4 {+ H; Q
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
) Y2 Z  ]7 {5 P  @; W9 w- gM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
- ]  C: @  m! f8 j/ n/ zL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點0 {$ a/ f8 P: x/ b/ t5 H
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma8 a' |3 |/ d4 k* A7 q; a9 s$ }
8 P: g& G: g3 m, o: `
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
) G/ j6 Z# ~* K7 z2 f有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，  v9 I( g, W3 }: U
由最好開始排起既話，" m3 q" ^3 b9 f
L B M F S 啦，0 `+ z. ^: p, [7 I* n& `0 G+ v
0 i7 g6 d8 i1 r) A# D: H8 V
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
. s' V, n+ O% v# F" V* ]但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？0 L( q# f. g& `; I) b  |
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？3 |6 g& g: K* k% A: X/ _
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
/ x6 }# m$ D9 g. @; a' p3 X( N
! E" Q6 h" \3 Z5 n5 U. ~2 W而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，4 K, Z! ~6 P: j4 v
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
& f. r. H4 N# P$ O明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
# r% t% f. I, `$ u% c# o" ?0 P
! |& K. ]8 V) c而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
. }0 F3 z& ~5 j' k4 _. l M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，8 ]5 u- z- D/ \) C5 Z) A$ s/ c
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，3 F  j! {8 A# t, _1 j5 {) ]
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，; l9 |7 x/ b: H3 X
M 都可算壞了。
" x8 L+ P+ v1 ?* x: A" A$ C$ @( l. I
F 呢個人仲掂，
. U( q4 O( e# B+ W知道既唔等於要講，
% T  {1 a/ Y/ |  [3 |0 N) i% \' F9 n/ W如果呢件事發生係自己身上，& b& Z; L$ F+ ?7 ]6 n( l
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
0 z  K8 y. u* v4 p# t
0 h: d+ X5 n9 x0 p) h7 T最衰個個緊係 S 啦，! e% J) B/ P. K
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。; ]+ Y! B/ \. p( f; s% N- c
0 F% v, A5 p, t7 y, l( z
6 u- Y6 u! u) v, n' ]9 B; f  s
" p& v( C+ Y8 x! H* E7 a" }- T4 A; P# K
題外話：' e- v, p: Y3 I% B" ~4 A
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，* c( q4 ^3 I- j0 y: x0 Z; q
睇到 S 呢條友，: C, H% t2 [- ~6 Z) E+ Z
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L9 w0 A4 Y' U5 X, V" T% N' ^
" y$ ]- v& B/ Z) J7 r" y
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
9 S5 b  g9 G; A. [' `) n9 u8 @$ P8 ^F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係# _. S3 E! O& ~- v) O2 I+ b( Q
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
5 }: F$ Y7 G& r/ j0 WB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
- K0 u0 _( }9 q+ t: pL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...