奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:! E$ ~# t6 k0 T$ P
6 I: b* o$ K+ @
agree,
/ `. G3 H" P# ~' A1 Z' B9 y" m我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,# {; z5 ]6 J: O
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,# X, G$ m  J* {% m. n- T
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

5 x& Z2 ^% f4 P6 e, Y
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html- K( g$ o+ l) r1 F6 {
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地, y4 Z- Q. C- }2 Q3 S+ E( C& A, D
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
) C; ^) Q" `" f' V" E- D( @Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
- d9 `, V9 H1 r4 Q% V有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ $ l1 [* A3 {" f9 l" l# u" K) E

1 K3 [' N! t# c6 T7 U7 ^# s係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
8 f4 J$ ^  \) w+ b! }: l/ O2 s, V' k- U6 x5 A' d' E5 Q9 h8 i
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

* [* h) Y7 D& Y; w0 L' J

: I5 j6 D7 `* X% |5 l5 a0 a絕對支持啦( N3 I( b% E- L8 ?3 ^, B# T: d

( B, u( S! P  ~4 T3 H2 g5 S) ?有錯就認,打就企定
' U" z! I7 I. w) q# s% c
% ]6 [0 ^' ]3 y# Q* X+ X) q無錯當然要撐到底7 Q' A4 D7 S1 n# m. z
$ v  p% V! \5 S# p, Q( z4 [* e
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩% [4 e" y/ Q! V
& ]  Q9 {6 e  @! m, a) n
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
- ]  `% W  e9 z3 k, {, E  {6 B3 q5 y9 \1 }- B) I3 M' E+ M) |% r- a
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力1 W( Q+ S. O0 _4 z4 f0 @6 U' I
# `6 ?* g9 c+ _7 ^+ a
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生. S: v  R- U, X! M, P+ J- o

5 l: A" `3 J9 M7 u唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?* ^" K4 F  R; b

/ P* m2 @2 M" G6 [我唔認為lor) _- L- z. a: T, P  j0 ?( R  a
9 g9 `9 b2 O7 a/ @
唔係話要整死佢地* I: s) e! ]# ]2 X/ n& r8 B% U
: x7 Z7 p5 y3 B- C
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
* u0 o4 F2 h2 V7 [! S7 q5 c, ^! h# q% k- @$ g" L; u
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大1 [; a) _, D4 S
3 \: I  t% X. [3 e3 ^
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
; g. @! C; m  h) Z) X, k$ `% B1 W. ]+ t2 y! g
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
- I) T7 R( I2 y; o  v& b1 Y. J8 `0 ~. F% h  ^
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句& Z, T# e6 x! X$ w+ I+ f
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"7 j# p( u/ Z% j5 _5 K* A

' `5 @. h; ~/ J/ S  q我們的大學生& s, [" k" _6 J) Y0 }

6 \9 y3 w$ r: M4 ]9 R
, v" X# D7 c" ~8 l# Y$ j( a% X& b. o+ B: m9 Y

# i7 }0 u7 k" i' B

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:$ m! C# \" ?- g, j# G
3 I5 D8 r: F% d, d* b5 ~+ p
6 J' U- ~: {! j
有見地 !!!; u& W. P, q1 s  u# M/ T- ?3 @
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
7 I; g, D: v$ I
5 t- p- e( T1 ?( XI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
. ?* S$ K9 O  A4 a/ L5 JI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 0 S1 n; t5 X' Y! V
I pretty sad that about the University official./ u& A9 M& Y& y8 D+ x1 m
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la. W6 q) |4 r1 z7 {8 {

! F" _! c, O! o( [/ e[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
5 P* t; b% f6 B! g( G7 Z% I我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la, E, o$ a0 Y4 \% q. G. I: P
9 B4 G/ Q. o) P; |. p1 ^( @! a
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

8 \9 q! `& r+ b/ R; u
7 A9 j  z5 H' I1 l
兩者有何分別?/ d  z, T% V! `2 F5 h5 m
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?