奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
% C. r! Z* D; `7 r
* G* _* P; y7 e6 b, q( s6 Gagree,
5 |. B/ [9 d, W  T% V, I% M我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
4 E: E7 o  w+ X( Z2 |. I" a* ~% D但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
6 i/ ~) }6 L0 b5 q+ ]期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

% S7 Z# A' F6 N  n
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html1 X. Z2 h; }# g" y% f
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地: y7 c9 C+ \5 S
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
7 I* J/ b/ x* U. oJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
- a/ _1 X3 G' k有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ , G& ]  D2 P6 P) M# N- ?

5 f8 g7 Z' ]& C. j/ C係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???2 \# B1 ~: P' O8 s4 Y# `

7 l( ?6 A. ?% i1 B( o3 ^9 v- t' Q為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

$ z+ ?8 P% X. v2 E5 Q0 J4 F1 H
6 [" m: Z  O; e$ F3 u
絕對支持啦
. F8 [( a% q7 E) `$ k5 n+ o3 f1 N
% e  q6 x% {; V: U0 N. F; Z* g7 P有錯就認,打就企定
, E+ f+ q+ J& z: b  |' P  r
- a+ {. z* D  s( x8 c無錯當然要撐到底
6 s9 `/ C4 l" O! K: L
- z3 m2 p$ M1 ^- y! e; Y但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩9 J! ^: r: M* P
) M. l; N3 U" D4 n3 J' Z
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得7 j6 G9 z  {/ \
  }5 P0 X. n8 E8 g* ]) h! _2 t8 N! s$ ~
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
" f1 D- {2 I; A$ l, p- r( {5 P! k
3 a7 Z( R! G6 @6 g我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生) q" P3 X2 I5 h- Y  S+ |- o% @

% V  C  p# r& W- ?, R3 I) w) t唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
& [: ~1 I$ I$ c; `0 ~, ]1 v1 S7 ]4 S8 m0 S
我唔認為lor5 K3 l4 \8 P" i2 ^  t2 w3 ~
; k9 V0 ]; T) S/ D( D- x7 ]
唔係話要整死佢地( f! I0 v6 g) O) P1 Y% o: r1 ]
/ M, m2 o4 j0 e+ w1 I
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用' ]4 p7 G. V0 d: b: E& J4 ?4 a. R

1 [& d' \' M5 i( E/ s% J" m9 Z' i% P我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
; k& g  e1 Y1 t' W, }4 f0 ~( V$ T# Q+ y6 d" z6 X3 u) l
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
0 Y( K7 I3 h7 T# K9 z0 `6 Z( \! A. J
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由  x. Z. ^% D: m; N, @# X+ X& L6 a

( w, R; n& k; _3 T7 \大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
4 s# J6 H* a. K2 p8 ~" T, V# m8 V"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"" ?3 q4 [. @# h3 U7 ^

. X  H; n* [8 v* ?我們的大學生+ M; Y! h! F, p8 b, B
/ K1 s8 H9 q# h0 K- J
9 a! M6 x; ^" C9 r
0 \1 y0 L2 w' Z6 G" ^
8 }# y' N4 Q. n  c5 D2 k

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:( x& b2 G. t0 R$ r0 V3 U1 u

4 a5 B0 F" v1 L- K' f
* s) V: O" {3 t0 _7 w) X有見地 !!!
4 f" c. N9 L: s. _7 s% Z& R現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
  X* V; R  ^9 d3 @  U4 l, g, G
. N6 P" c) u. ~& D+ X& JI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. ( Q- I5 B9 A, P$ @( {9 T; r
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
: `9 A7 C& k: j* CI pretty sad that about the University official.' N8 s( ~7 X& b% ^
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
" G# e+ N; Y' l/ k& h' p; v, y/ L' f! V8 G  j7 B, n& J# w
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
% S7 B* U" O( @% U6 A3 t) y/ A我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la0 Y; q' \; s: h+ W5 M" c3 J5 O) p
9 I2 ?. B6 [8 @( M7 P
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

3 n/ h; r  R0 U1 P: F0 ?) s
+ R0 Q3 |3 `+ U; k  q# k/ E兩者有何分別?  p5 l$ O/ R" T! {/ q; c
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?