Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
8 g0 M6 u, Z& W# W4 h( N8 ~- Q- Z
' Y( T7 X. p6 v) y  y% O8 F+ Y+ i! K
# N3 a# }& I6 {/ \我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

; @2 w1 v7 ]" x+ k! A: _$ q

# x0 E' R. e; a  v7 NIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:; J- B$ P  v* S0 u% s/ `  w
( }0 n' A, X+ f5 T* }; X

' }; L4 f( r/ |' M) V+ n) MIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

- T& Y! o' A7 U+ x9 G
6 `' o' O0 `9 R5 b
oh really...# }9 r. v+ e! v+ @' \3 q, x" F" W
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
7 i( M" X; ~3 _1 Zi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題; c% M& U4 y1 N/ k4 J
2 D/ i9 F# G7 `7 S- H+ Y
當然這是個假設性問題
! I/ Z: V/ v3 O5 A! k1 i1 I! o8 T4 g但將人數倍大  U( K% p9 D  A" v% x3 a( Q5 ^
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
8 Q4 L, n" O! J3 O) W. D(情況可以換作其他)
: `; g) j% W+ I* H6 j& O6 ~始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
& p" N3 \* \: p5 J) E8 N( e如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...+ _5 Q/ i, N+ d* C1 u; s6 q9 m$ g
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:; t/ _: F# ?/ h! y" l7 j# R
絕情谷既問題...
- j. u# G' o6 T" u$ i0 L$ S3 S* O如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...& V+ r2 y% T& M( e* W2 t
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

' y: {8 R! }( \6 a* y- T1 C
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好4 ^, K9 y1 V5 S
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
) F4 h2 u0 I  a: ~% l' {; O但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
1 g" r/ S7 C1 a! p好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢0 X: v5 m6 q" B$ V, |; h% W5 c
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
( O7 U% Z' s5 m" M3 o. S* r) J( P" e! g
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
2 @7 T7 `( j( O# F& R$ u% x不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:" ~0 y0 a/ |8 \) k1 c/ ^
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

7 M6 A, e9 \& y, d- a+ @3 V
) b, C  s0 L1 @7 ]  ~8 M4 [haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
0 I$ t, ]* J" L" l" ]  d你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....+ j. k* J5 F0 U7 H: t3 p& d; v
3 V' V! p0 R; M" z
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
$ u' s4 ~7 w) y6 ^* V9 C2 Cyes, my reason is helping more8 U; O$ {" B7 I: v" N7 T
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!) `: o7 @, o& t* q
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child* a2 C% S- J6 b8 Z5 d& D
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?" N$ E, M6 ~3 J, f! n
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
3 l) a% S( a0 J: @7 Fmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!  G# E, ?* h! p, ?+ j2 q
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
- K( X. o6 v. `當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
& Z' c7 M, {* L) C; t$ ~' m  F我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~% e% k% d, }) \7 _, S4 _+ u
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~  k* V1 z3 L1 u. [. j
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~* c; E6 ^: \/ r8 ?/ D
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~, `: E) b/ e' S* C* G2 [$ U4 W
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
. ~4 k' {+ e% U% e0 T7 K我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）