Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
6 g( V) l  g, `9 d, Q3 `3 U# \1 y0 i+ S  E

' w/ D7 J2 @# L/ L4 T& Q% h1 O! y2 [我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

0 S4 v0 e1 X; b% ~6 I. D
3 f0 w% r; q9 h: f- Z" G7 l, B4 Y" H
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:) v; n, n2 q- |( Y# m+ X2 R# L4 V

! v4 g% F) n: A8 E2 R. k7 S, m! T& O5 n; H3 Z/ v
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

/ Z: [+ r- t( T
& c$ X6 V( s- F. t5 {. a: poh really...+ @' Q7 V3 h( ~  G
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"; Z2 @/ B0 [7 f/ ^) Y- R1 U( Y
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
0 F- P" r9 p. }- f5 L9 V/ e! j2 H' `/ Z" ]2 M4 W+ S
當然這是個假設性問題
5 K" H% H1 Q$ Q但將人數倍大' B/ x* q' `/ s3 M1 i0 e. A" b
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
3 T5 u9 }/ ~5 p, B. b* v(情況可以換作其他)4 T) L" ^. l3 D7 O0 l
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...* A4 D9 K+ q( J3 s; [, k
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
/ {3 u" Z8 X1 y如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
/ E2 ]! ?% q8 g6 q  }% T- J絕情谷既問題...3 V& K7 h6 Y1 h6 m) q
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...) `" ]  M& \* X! l8 d
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

" ]$ U% |8 Q8 Z4 e# b! P殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
- l) ~9 v! ?) X於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
, Y9 g" a% ^$ @2 @0 }但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
2 q+ U/ M9 ]' C+ f2 K* F好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
/ J, Y" A0 S* P  T/ W2 S1 ^2 A7 c其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
- X5 [' Y: N! |# f
7 U+ z. Y: e$ @& Z# }. ?3 i( k- X' M我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
3 S1 F* [  A# {2 @不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:$ Z$ l1 L4 f7 G' g% V! K- E* Y) A
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

& j7 w# e0 O& x8 l$ H1 O; i, K: h' g& k+ T1 c# q% L
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣" S- u4 I3 g9 L# i
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了...." r1 C) {( u: x- M/ o. O
- d! M' Y  N" ~  }* S# g6 `% |
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
* a  \- N0 i3 k" B; Wyes, my reason is helping more  y& n3 f9 a5 w+ [  R3 |
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
0 w. x! m6 a5 }if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
/ f) O* R% a- G! v9 b0 U3 v3 sbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?  R  Z; d" d2 |5 Z2 H
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!7 e$ B- b! o6 j# \
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
2 q) F& w; |1 u/ Aunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~( s# q! g! `! Q7 `) t
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~! {6 I; Q/ d5 F4 C, G' ^3 u5 j
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
/ m  n  t* N7 @0 Z2 i2 }3 F$ r正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
$ p. A- E3 Y+ p8 y' X7 {' T即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~8 ^  V) `# I% v6 v
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
7 e" d1 m. T) r% H但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
1 l7 `/ \  N3 ]- Z# t( j我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）