Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
  ?; |( T5 X6 P" w: s* h  m8 h! {9 c3 c; M

2 @" U% x9 F1 ], W! f我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

, X( ^5 O. ?7 g0 |8 N2 X
- [9 O/ Z2 T  F, i9 fIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
6 h2 P' y# d) c9 Y- r3 M' \) V7 O* |. q

8 p9 H8 U$ o  V- U# Z* OIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

2 }$ h* U- N: }7 h- Z$ c

. ]9 Q: d* A+ X4 Z$ w# koh really...) @& X  {2 X2 t" B
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
3 [4 b3 n: n: h( p2 pi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題  Y8 ]0 P5 v  h2 S
! C% y  D8 x7 p/ c. O0 {) S
當然這是個假設性問題
- k, o) d7 N5 C1 ]但將人數倍大
2 T. Y& |5 e: V6 d9 D例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
; J/ \4 k+ y: u; ?! O(情況可以換作其他)* S6 s1 i' v9 [, p
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...3 r/ ~1 [4 j7 N/ I" h, {
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...4 D1 c& N& h( p
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
8 m- p; R. l# X4 j3 T# R絕情谷既問題...; X5 D7 c5 |6 s
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
- e! i% h" n( p8 u8 J如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

; t" X* R: @% L6 Q3 W5 [殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
2 u' T$ U: b$ h於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
& j0 {' u( g9 R0 R) ?5 M2 o, O3 H- W. ~但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
4 ]8 K) _( r2 Q. \  Y好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢+ m7 ~7 X+ \- S+ W8 ^% B2 J
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢; c, ^' H# [/ n/ }! J! x1 S' i
2 V7 }# d' h# B7 B9 N- n3 V
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
1 q) E4 U: E" D0 v& V: C  O- O不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
1 p* Y: z9 p, c9 s  u其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

& N# S/ E) f3 u
6 R: n9 V  A% s1 V; z" ?. Nhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
4 q4 x( L: y. }$ U4 h  t. ?9 r你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
+ e) P& [! E0 Z4 X( j( R3 J
0 C8 w$ ~! K" C  L) d# s) Gp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
. `% ]1 b' X0 ?+ D) Xyes, my reason is helping more
& v0 {* K4 M9 i2 l5 M% H+ i0 m/ Wfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!" L3 ^" h% d4 ^
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
1 P! l  i0 ^$ K# s4 V- g# rbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
: w7 @) g" U; Z  balso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
: c' x5 w4 X1 U8 B$ }9 kmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
) J. |0 A9 P5 T9 S1 S6 v/ v! Kunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
1 V5 [% p$ D, n當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~' j. ]5 E. D2 R8 |$ a
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~0 m5 b& E) X. x: U# m
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
* z' a( k0 N- p. e7 f. y2 Q即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~4 \; f: o( L6 L
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
/ ~/ o. v  b0 p0 X但如果o係當時o既情況中~~! E/ a# s% L- ]  l1 Z: G
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）