Rika

由最好排到最壞" j1 H2 O' c! W; X5 w
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong+ s( H/ ~& N+ I7 A5 B* C1 b
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount7 n) F5 C8 R1 K3 P6 F: ^
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
& W) i  m; v/ N/ L- R5 h) ~0 d4 E* N' AM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
# X2 \) o+ x6 \9 [: cL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:4 q1 ^9 u4 p- }1 ~, E2 A& P6 o
) {- n: }/ P) P# h
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
% A; M" O3 T5 C& u- |1 Z: Q8 M* w, y$ o' x
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
7 v. e, M# n. D7 }0 ^     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
5 z! [* u  @0 G7 Q. [6 r  S* i: j5 v. ]. z( J- m
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做1 n; t2 W+ X* s6 |: Z
( X2 d9 R+ Q2 n$ F
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志" ~$ p1 `  e. M: `, \' n+ Y
( r* z+ ^! H: N2 T$ l2 c8 G  t
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,' g. |& ~: N/ j- @% k
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好# w; [/ k$ t  {+ I3 U7 y, V( x
9 o' ]! F, _2 j( ]% C. O2 T
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案7 J( k( \# C8 V1 E/ H" |
而家答多次
# B2 W; l/ T5 ]f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
- q5 _2 |( k  G3 W3 t$ Ol: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
1 q1 N, K" N: {7 c3 kb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢" v# s6 b+ h$ j. Q
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
( w8 E1 \( ~4 Lm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
3 x1 S9 F9 p: r, f
. B) l# x) f# ^) c  b, S3 ?L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大8 @' ]; X( t. i+ v7 f) I6 Y+ P& g6 C
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度. `* I# V) B! l6 G, N* ]3 ~
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒$ P! A3 `6 a: a( P' @- |3 Z
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
# }4 z7 k9 g/ I- L4 B0 L8 z9 M0 pB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
# I/ d& K3 }3 d5 _+ v' ZF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
1 Y) R) E  g& ?/ f4 R9 iS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
" W# D, T; w( p1 c! fM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
3 ]$ A; n/ |" lL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果  K8 |5 P' B  V- E2 N9 Q
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情' r9 u6 J5 g4 |' I
2 {2 x# e# L$ L' D5 n$ m
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:" P2 e4 G9 ~+ d
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己, k! j- R6 ~$ V: {% N
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
3 d. e5 }' N; i6 s+ f# @S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
* K/ Z% `7 E0 \' B  vF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方  r6 a. O* S6 o+ v& b: ?" o4 P- `
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

8 G! y3 e7 S  j! ~. p
# N$ `: [1 R# b) ^7 F4 m' O
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
* P) e/ X7 S5 b! M" w& e6 W- W, r0 k& k; r/ z# h# w
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  1 A6 F# L, P$ X6 p
2 ?) I, Z5 p% P. g3 l
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )+ {+ [6 \/ d; `* W

7 ^% m+ [( V4 U( G5 L. _F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
6 W& T" i$ U4 Z8 l% p
" T7 c+ ]# K" g6 }' z. I) i/ Y6 `& `0 TM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
8 H9 Y# a& ~5 C' y
% g4 g+ {- x# U( j9 R7 M& Z3 Q[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
+ t: l$ W9 d( W: z3 WM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢: T- z7 H0 ]! N" l) [/ b
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點+ k# J% G8 K% l+ n5 W9 G
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma0 k2 r8 z  x- `1 H; h, q

4 q. ?* G2 b  W  }- L7 M0 b最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
, P; I, ?! `8 O5 B8 Y( r有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
+ q. D0 H: _+ s$ j/ S# E6 v由最好開始排起既話，  [$ G1 [/ |9 r
L B M F S 啦，' p1 B# ^, z7 q
8 d* [7 |7 e- ]
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
- Z+ p. R8 E6 ?, {  {  H/ h+ u& @但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？. |. V' k, c5 h
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？* M8 T8 c+ b# ~% ~5 Z( g
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
) M/ d( }4 x7 H" n) y+ |
$ o0 K' T$ A, E而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，8 j9 `+ K1 u* d5 g: B* l+ n
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，9 d7 L0 y+ C, n( W( m' ~
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。" W* d4 o0 w& X* }- K& w8 B# B4 a
$ X2 ^8 _0 x7 T# e  g
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，* C# _; E0 p# i) \
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，" |: W: q8 h& D4 G. g  _8 I
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，, x- ^" |4 T! A% A
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
5 v* E5 @4 L" ?4 N M 都可算壞了。! W2 q9 f3 r1 Q  o6 [

8 y' n+ `! [! Q  J8 ] F 呢個人仲掂，
2 `- F- _1 q+ Z8 o知道既唔等於要講，
+ P% P  Z# V5 Z' W& j8 R8 }如果呢件事發生係自己身上，0 U' z( i7 F6 m( X
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
* F/ `# u, |+ `$ m0 c: v9 e, b! b$ W1 {' l# h" a1 d
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
4 L1 i- p* t, ^9 N1 f: _9 y, r6 }始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。9 ^& Y' I  O2 E% K% h$ `

0 h8 f0 q. g0 ?  V
- Y% q4 H8 n5 p
1 f1 M5 j! Y5 w; i& n題外話：
4 c; n6 m; K" a3 C0 g唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，/ L8 `1 X. |, c1 I& f
睇到 S 呢條友，
4 r/ X( u) ~- j7 n4 x, T我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
5 ?' i& W' C# [. y0 o- C* `
3 O2 g7 }$ Y" `' JS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
, |6 X! i. ]7 [8 z' ?F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係) l$ x& F: Y. h' Z/ D! y
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
% ]. M9 X' t+ H. v' N; PB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
/ U. w+ I  [; y2 a' Y0 c# g4 C8 {L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...