- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.4 E8 K% N& r3 ^# }6 w. m
- Z/ \, e# C2 t
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this. `; X; D+ L7 B9 ?0 c% G
5 y' }1 d% W a2 YIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
H5 ^2 F- H1 A! @9 I- |and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
% K+ ~ X8 \ R& ?
f. Z# T8 E4 F" f/ Qso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險9 R$ i$ n l4 L
+ e; J V8 C. s5 }) W' q) Pin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, M9 l& }0 u+ M: K' a
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|