Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
) ]8 p, ?- B+ \& z9 e  D$ p) R% l# _
* s( I, ^& z4 d; l8 H- O: |
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

$ H" v6 @3 f1 y" H! _
' L4 H! E& U- J, Z; |* P) V4 KIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:' Y$ _5 @' l' V
+ Q& @4 `! Q3 W+ w1 o
3 a# o0 i1 q1 m8 u+ \
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

, i- T' n+ G  }4 ~) y( P6 {$ W9 e, A. }
( A! k2 Z3 g. c3 D+ {
oh really.../ R, a: n: R. u- \
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
" Y0 K4 k- l  `+ h6 V2 hi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題0 f( j4 i% [- n

% J2 r& h7 D3 q# v$ z當然這是個假設性問題
! A# x8 g7 Z1 x: t9 b但將人數倍大
: C- x) l7 E4 W% F$ H/ _例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
7 j, ?; x9 T3 y% T: i(情況可以換作其他)1 h" @  J: l# _' w0 r
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...0 u3 w* m$ I& T
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...# R( L. s2 J: e" i7 h5 N
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:: U5 O$ C- `$ w1 d2 `
絕情谷既問題...
) i( Q, L$ S" j4 g$ o如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...$ [: S0 g. x1 d1 @) [
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

7 F2 N: i1 Q  m) N$ K
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
7 O# b! ^, F" i2 C5 I. k. M於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生2 T7 E  [) A+ S$ j
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩4 @8 q& }& X# e/ C
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢9 ]! |) Y: h5 b8 p% |
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢! m( B* p3 `: N$ g/ B  b! s
, B" H9 A- N6 ?* P+ B) g+ j
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
, [, ~. i, M0 K+ O7 U1 h) ]. B不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
4 l/ t/ Z# L' r其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

3 s$ q: Y1 k% L8 c
* D( y* `, H2 A. i, y# `) ?
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
' j3 n9 n+ w& `0 J0 e你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
% }. i* r# y6 F$ K* k" _8 Z. u0 U. N9 C; z9 d' m
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
+ G) A3 E/ e+ U! |: G+ f/ Fyes, my reason is helping more0 ]. j7 h7 q7 \# r" m
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
. q7 K( @" z- c* k; x9 xif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child1 O1 Z# h) J& c) q" [5 m
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
) d' ^6 {' s! c% J! Dalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
1 u; c0 |/ A2 r/ i, N. q% tmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!- y% w! N& J& o! h
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~! u% i/ y% k0 D2 R6 `4 j) U
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
; ?$ ^5 c0 i+ S) v0 U我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
5 ~9 t: t4 f* c+ {8 T5 ?( y" D正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~& c8 I- X9 b) k/ R) E4 J
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~4 X' `! Z( a9 C3 H0 x
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~, r, j* n: N& {
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
1 A1 d, b: ?- \$ u4 B我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）