|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.% b8 q# v" g) ^- N5 U0 E9 X" J* @7 i
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,# M! ]/ i' t) O/ |
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.+ m+ l6 _: U) ?# _, n% ?
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,' T1 I. o' a+ k
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.& q0 Y% ]. N6 J8 W& z" h3 u G0 E
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.2 G7 r [+ e& i( G+ L1 x
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,4 r! O M6 i! @/ M, o- f K# z
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
# ^% r, k" v9 u4 C0 C( c9 [eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
( C& y: C( A4 A- N7 @% ^ L; Gbanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.; p% b- P8 e( z8 H- g6 c
3 M" ], l' r* [im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
. |2 G; ^6 A5 }* Iin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.2 A% u1 n. R8 [: H
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
8 j0 V4 a3 B5 E9 N1 CA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.. {7 a- j5 l3 ^( k4 y5 b
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
$ Y+ r3 c ~6 _; |$ @& Jbut the value of their assets did really drop significantly. n0 E6 N+ ?* G2 R# u9 N( r0 P
! j6 [! b) w2 n' P# B+ \[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|