|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
$ r R6 Y$ ^) A2 fCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F," W8 V" w+ a5 ^( E% F
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment., {4 S& ~$ O. ~
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,% X b) L3 T6 y1 [/ R& a0 H
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
a, F/ T+ _4 C5 q# ]* P2 dAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.' }8 P; b2 S r, N
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,) g. a7 C9 {( _7 M, S
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. 5 I" L# `; X( ~9 V* M& P$ C
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
- g1 u; y$ ~& o9 t! _banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.6 a. S' ^2 S. a% I' U' S% k/ R
3 P! u) r' Y7 |9 xim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
* F0 ?9 s" X0 c8 y$ c6 gin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.; p! |8 ]/ r1 d# f! ~) Y; S& z
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,8 T$ F8 q( s; V$ g& c, E& J
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction." H8 v( [* K& `
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. & C2 E: \/ W! Z$ a* |5 U- _
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
& @' g/ P! M" b/ D" U& K" N* u6 J. F% p: ?7 Z% h
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|