|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
: E% M& l l/ d9 ^0 M; Z/ i! qCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
8 L' ~+ i5 P4 T: P& M6 T6 \3 nmore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
$ b# x7 u9 C9 h8 v; F1 mmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
- Z+ ?% }' h1 B, R* B6 nin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
! w/ p# X1 P! W# L' Y& GAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.5 e) ^0 |2 v* L( ]# K
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,4 S' _- A4 G* E" Q5 _8 f: I# V
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
) u& h) A, q- `! B4 m2 V+ Reg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. " \& \9 x9 F1 l$ i. _( M, M( T3 D9 x
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
* u7 k l4 i5 j" X
; `% N: R9 p6 ~$ d Fim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
+ ~8 U" l2 J0 K: c. y6 w/ g+ uin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
& j7 W: q3 o! i% p7 IFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,8 F# p) s2 _8 d* U
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.$ d# _( [4 \; `* l5 y
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
; g0 ~( m" ^* d6 H. ^8 ^5 kbut the value of their assets did really drop significantly., D* @! ]" {/ C/ h& b' n
, d( E" A/ U9 l, \$ D2 K# g" T8 Y
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|