|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
# Z1 @. o- T1 F4 L- ECDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
; Y" t+ K' c$ R# h% Jmore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
; u" M4 N6 R0 f( v9 zmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,% s5 }+ H9 {7 j4 \. X' p
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
, Q2 ]9 \$ d" u" V% w+ `) G" \Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
7 t% y8 L2 ?$ P" b! @" Asimilar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,: N( D. r; l5 c9 n$ A z/ F8 X; f
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
* t c3 M2 R2 Beg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
6 l: R9 h& c6 q7 n; c- xbanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
3 |" }% {, a, ^" n M
, V* o# | c: i7 @im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
! q" _) [$ a% K6 Pin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
* w0 W: _/ e. u7 o( JFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
% r2 F! `, R; x% U, ]+ FA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
" D6 X- n9 F2 P/ ?6 z: DThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. 9 e$ C0 o* C! h
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
5 d: U5 O) \8 H, y2 X! f, f& {# J/ ^" l, _9 c+ ?4 i
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|