|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.2 y1 b/ j, l R$ [
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,/ \1 J% }6 U) G
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
8 A/ O8 _% b1 jmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
$ S+ d4 `: c u$ Xin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.& y% T0 S" }# i' A
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
# n# v1 ]" {; \3 j s, [* Esimilar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,3 V! P7 ?$ ?# l( R
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
) E4 C8 x2 d: m. [eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
4 Q. N2 @7 {3 E1 _5 w; Rbanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.7 ?! t% j' X& _. ?
5 {* R, w. {- B0 `! D Q/ l) O2 @
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.8 u5 W9 R) x' s* E, S9 P- a
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
$ K# s8 s% t9 p8 q+ |. uFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,; \8 v! l' ?" H! p/ N; p
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.9 k7 b* \. \( k, z( }: f
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. 5 o& @( r: Q+ K# c
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly." q$ ~. G$ s+ r* a3 u* S
' w$ y5 {0 O$ W4 q[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|