|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.4 n5 Q7 [5 [3 P
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
" h/ q7 c. g3 z$ v8 p8 Gmore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.' u1 N8 t* D* [& g. s, D6 f$ H- J5 ]% N
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
* `# Q& d3 ]- W3 s. \: Din other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.' Y) _: T% x k8 W$ b5 K
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency. D" j! [# E7 `5 m, F
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,- G. ]0 r/ h$ ^ p
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. % [) y: X3 h4 r% [8 N' s# s
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
9 w7 Q* b7 |+ {# Rbanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
# d' {4 a/ q" ~# z8 C1 ~
: u0 Z( G4 d9 W- c j( J* X1 x8 iim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
! J9 |' L* ~) Y. s+ [in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards./ C( q* U$ W( V" \; x8 A/ N
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,9 {6 N( z* E: M6 U! E% J+ Q* {
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.* y' P( J3 n% S2 y
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. ) ~. m, O4 [( x7 u |
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
: ]/ F( u# y9 c, h2 E
& U3 L; @" `+ o7 @[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|