|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
( ~9 ^ s! A: y& e3 Z( A5 t( tCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
! n2 @. F, y" ?: a7 k" F. b8 umore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
, p! R e4 }# x" J! u, n0 Xmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,' u' h' P+ O( s, a4 R8 v, V
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.9 o8 H( W5 }. P: U! m
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.: l8 s- r& Z, s+ R
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,( p, W2 s: @2 ]3 ^' h
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. 3 A/ t4 h: F$ N4 \
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
[9 i0 Z7 Z1 X* Z' Xbanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
( B# T+ Z9 L3 U% D
R8 u" J" w8 D# i# Gim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.. P! C' a1 t0 t- P# Y
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
( W7 C6 m: J+ H% ^For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
) O; J* p c: |9 @6 l9 }' z+ i0 yA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
2 `2 b/ F) i( }& h0 o. KThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. * q6 A6 a5 p- Y9 p5 n. H/ Z1 ?5 e; P
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.' y% |2 G* b4 Q) T9 j
& f0 j" d& D! h) `( p% y( _- ~3 w& m[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|