|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.8 ]" ]6 y+ g7 @: S
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
8 b( l8 C6 _, ?1 \4 J6 \! ]# l- y3 Umore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
/ I# s1 K3 L6 J1 xmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,1 ~. p% X! \( W8 I& Z# K
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.: v6 M- F, b+ Q; T3 j# U, w+ a) i
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.9 J4 t2 W% C) N Y$ {4 V
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,9 {# ]( |5 E j" h
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
8 H, N' j/ U* a) A+ u3 u( W2 Veg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
" D+ D8 i/ z9 c8 k4 q' ~- h/ q# L0 Cbanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
/ T) N) D6 U( g; c3 q7 m0 F8 G8 A7 _5 P
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.4 Y, s" s1 M/ q4 h$ ~0 u
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.- p9 A+ k6 H* ^6 u" I6 I! Q1 Q
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,( Z: d& E5 d+ X0 d/ N" \
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
. O0 p* [8 y4 b: v7 KThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. 4 f, r. y) U( A$ \( G" @4 B9 J+ c
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly. N7 C8 G( l( _, G* M
( Z* E* n1 [4 N/ ?[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|