|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.0 N- U# K% b7 U; b7 U h
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,. u% P, P' T- I H3 h: g
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.( Q6 P3 N) ~& f+ `
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
- }0 }! N+ J" E n( ?" y' q3 k _* iin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
( G+ i" g% P. u' CAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.+ C; x' ~" |& Q, O( ~5 B! G
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
% J' @5 d! U- {. }normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
- A9 W$ l- Z; r- a! Feg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
% q* V; G* y8 k( e8 b( }8 f5 jbanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
- q1 L" c$ D ^$ r, U7 W7 z' G$ {% m; A
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
& g3 z( y& G& s2 `4 {5 Din stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.' g* [1 I. I& c# z8 C; z
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,) i, R# G, g8 }8 U' N
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
1 f7 v$ A6 H) f2 n' u, ]: FThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
J+ G( C6 l% z' c) H! U. U# Ibut the value of their assets did really drop significantly.3 h+ G3 k7 p- ]" x% C% b6 R9 Y
5 L) {, ?* c! h& Y3 f8 r[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|