|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
% z, R! B! {" kCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
6 k$ ?0 w) a% ]7 k/ z# vmore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.; }3 w7 f9 N- `2 k# J+ |) z& z K; f# W7 @
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
( ^- e, R5 H$ i7 K; |# w8 Rin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
, T: _" B6 e2 _" J3 ZAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
k4 i! |2 w0 gsimilar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,# X" y$ w, Q6 R! v) x3 T
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
7 m9 A" ]" d6 L3 l0 Teg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
1 ~, y* n, N. P9 f6 \banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.+ ^- V& j. P1 U; c0 z" I8 R' [
9 U* A; m) K0 j; Q) W
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
2 I* |( |: J) X }: t Yin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.# Y+ K0 Q* }- I5 w) ^0 n, N
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
: N# [! _) d, S4 v |) ~A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
0 P( A1 T! ^2 V. W UThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. * z- p; `7 S# l7 V5 p! Z: S
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
; }0 J& A+ K0 u, k
! n* o: s0 T0 C) w/ k% f$ E, ][ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|