151515

Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:41:
6 x) }4 N/ h+ {7 y, ?  K0 g1 j0 |5 w2 K2 e
: p, {9 M3 n, x; f3 _) \
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->...

) S+ D0 R! L" M3 o$ H/ [but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9

機密

Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:42:
. h+ S& N6 j: ]4 E% v. q4 B$ Q4 J0 r/ U  _
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9

) |* \1 k' d# u( E7 J% D9 T3 v5 J
) P% Y$ K4 a$ C
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by  諸葛亮.  He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.
: D4 N9 |) b1 {  U5 k9 h6 a% x$ ~7 M8 \1 d, |1 A5 ]- k* T
[ Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM ]

151515

Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:44:
1 J& ^3 v% {% q/ u, s0 m/ F0 w0 `$ n( q

+ J3 X: \8 A/ d) RBut I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維.

$ O  {- e$ o3 u: t+ Y
8 d% C, D8 X# a" P, Uwhy?
" d1 F7 k. P, ?$ M+ G( c- Z4 A1 m& P+ `7 `5 e+ g
其實他們實力差不多，很難比較

機密

Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:45:
' g8 O/ y: v) T# O$ o' a
3 y1 w, g. i( p, x; A+ T% W
' y& f( C8 B* n8 \why?
" p  \: N, G" f5 D# B
3 A4 o2 S* s  D: ?* I% l" w1 U7 z其實他們實力差不多，很難比較

* j6 w! y+ Z# ~+ i& D9 f

! y5 W! d% t% Ksee #22 Thus
% H3 U; O, T, |. Y" @' b
, ?$ e% Z( Q# h智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->
* k3 K( w6 }7 X2 X1 |+ n: z  o* O+ G, d
軍事才能：諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維5 B7 {) ?6 q7 ]4 N+ n5 [4 V6 r

* P% [8 g' N' {2 j" {! v政治才能：<--- actually I forgot the details.
9 P" G" k9 z1 V( L
9 S) O4 x, L  Y5 o打：姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮

機密

In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him.  姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of  諸葛亮.% V# l7 y$ f1 {  `

* _7 K# D( S' _  G' [1 F[ Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM ]

151515

Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:50:
# g9 r+ h9 c( H! M& DIn addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him.  姜維's fascination is better the others because he was the only student of  諸葛亮.

% b' t) |6 W7 }7 N
4 A6 x# X0 }# [* d- @他比孔明更偉大

機密

Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:51:  a, z$ \2 _3 Y' S

& R4 Q3 M& v$ k/ S& E8 I: q& u) D# ]# g4 h5 v: x1 O
他比孔明更偉大

+ D* G* N) r) g, s' D+ q( F# {9 D

& j8 q/ m6 Y& F" TAgree.  Both of them were extremely loyalty.  However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation.  He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.

151515

Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:55:* L$ b( m1 }, J" _& {0 w0 c

% R, r. l. `; b4 N4 N- B' D0 E  R
Agree.  Both of them were extremely loyalty.  However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation.  He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.

+ Q; U' e0 Q" N1 @" b% W9 c- }+ N: W6 F( E, O7 p
他支撐了蜀國三十年，雖然孔明也有２７年（２０７－２３４），但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多，五虎已屈機

機密

Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:58:
$ C  C( v" X. c  {8 a5 W/ i
' B7 S, k0 `" Q; r) Y4 f( m& t6 }1 ^6 \8 Z! j: U$ B8 C! l! Z
他支撐了蜀國三十年，雖然孔明也有２７年（２０７－２３４），但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多，五虎已屈機

3 z$ j9 T2 ?5 e  m' o! gyes, that's the point.

151515

Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 22:03:; I* s. x! Q% p% x

3 Z& \: k6 }/ I6 \yes, that's the point.

% G" S+ L  H7 j

- F0 H, r9 ]& Y5 C+ z+ Q陸遜也偉大，但不得善終......