- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
- I2 T' `5 Y. [+ o! q$ O- Y; K2 Q2 m2 B# V7 ^4 c. l
4 F; Y$ O/ I, U# |4 o$ e/ e$ o同意.$ f, G: }" G6 w3 V& N+ I
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... / Q( t* G: a* e! K6 T6 I
5 M: y1 D1 U! w, N0 w
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
. p" C( w$ e2 p& Q; a6 q( D( qYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students+ }) a; ~: H( |# I5 H
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles./ p% q. n2 U1 J* P
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
- |% e. H4 K! Q9 A ]! G
% c! t* i1 t* K1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
" ]' c% K& m- g2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
0 S. x. k/ W. {3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
9 w. W/ g# G! {3 v, d1 s4 Z5 S4 a
! M5 k7 n" ^1 H7 r; q3 zThanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|