|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:0 W2 P8 c; `( H" U
8 u1 \, T/ r6 r9 w! [- ~
* _1 r7 r( d. S# F; ^- B* f" ]6 g! Y
同意.9 i5 ]+ v% P. T9 L7 b5 @& q/ d
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... v) f) {& T: b9 l& ^7 ?, O
) y1 M( t- B( c7 b
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
! U2 e H& N, r# R3 R' C$ OYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
8 S, G& H/ _. p% U1 u9 h' BI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.2 o0 v& c$ Q, q- p, B4 `, P) L% x7 ?
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
; v' f4 d' a6 A' ^7 Y( O x' I, J/ ?- }9 v& ~7 N
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law$ P/ X. _1 U5 \0 l! w n1 g/ \5 v! K
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper; f9 `: I5 n! `# c* G* Q: `
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published& Q& }0 N( `5 B$ [
, H( n2 A6 ?$ Y' m* b3 X" B
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|