|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
& L, w% s" O8 n c- L+ l9 {6 K* e' M1 v( f" j1 w
- ] n. ^ y ?4 i7 B1 G5 q同意.7 y2 ?( h" h* Y$ Y2 o
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... . g4 ^3 u* `4 W% `: S* O8 l2 D5 T) K
" W- j/ a8 ?+ E* S5 e3 sI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
; P* k! b+ g, C+ _Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students- F3 c5 @' d8 q6 e
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.5 V! n; J; n y) ?
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.) z, _1 C9 |2 n
# F; J( s# r& M9 |7 M
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
$ e* i/ V- J! {5 L2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
/ d2 w. T( q$ b$ d8 x3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published4 M2 |. I* h/ s, k* p
8 f! z, v9 N9 X. f( l; Y, Y6 x
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|