|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
% {8 B, G7 s6 }3 K4 B/ y8 T, B6 f1 g: k6 i( M
/ ?' i4 B$ a9 \" G1 S同意.6 ~: J; a, y3 m# t2 \5 ?' ]( B3 g
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... ( i5 M7 M E( X. p H- W# }/ ~
6 @4 H1 B$ [4 L. }0 K4 C
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.1 D/ U4 @: O( {
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
, r3 V/ h+ q9 A1 f5 C4 _$ p4 qI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
, e0 k$ d) t. sAs a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.! a+ G7 N" X7 d
1 S6 @2 G7 O' R1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law# e$ }" J. K2 B$ h
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper" \2 f% Q. O Q
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published; \; G" m( |' n3 A( E- Q- l
" K6 F& z$ w Y) I' j) P$ h
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|