 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:3 d. d9 i* t! ^; ^6 C
+ e9 m0 ~) ^7 c, K/ r
! h1 a' E- \ A2 I: c5 ?同意.
5 c5 ^9 L8 K! E; Q但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... , L0 P' N4 g1 p h% _: `8 c. M; z
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.4 q8 L: E: B3 W2 Z% c
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
4 a: z$ U% K0 C5 H9 X$ f6 iI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.+ [" V7 ^$ L9 ?- ?" X. ^
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
5 c& D n; M8 ^# r( _/ ^; |$ k
7 K- r9 `: _0 I6 l+ B) r2 l- t2 @ S( T1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
* ]1 ]$ _* X# Q# ]$ W2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
# A- S K3 B0 {$ t5 ]3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
- Z, K: C* \ \) B x" z8 h$ s" _3 @' e- o2 f: d( o( G
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|