|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
, p/ r$ |, @+ d5 V. h9 M
% t. C0 `5 Z& w- W
9 V9 }: o1 D+ [) o9 z同意.4 k. C, \1 s9 `7 Q
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... 0 `4 p% t* N5 @! e
. K. O. ]5 ?( i8 ]1 L
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
/ q) Q& Q5 i* E* t4 L5 N, ]Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students2 w: B* T1 I8 d- ^4 s
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.# a# z6 p/ D0 N0 s& w+ z: J
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
9 i l. _! a3 p' u) |# y8 z; C! K, [! c# N
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
& A4 k! \1 W7 ^) h Z+ [$ G5 y2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
1 g1 Z# _4 J; B/ {( l3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published" A$ j) {, `: _0 Q* T
& ]5 n, A9 m* U4 IThanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|