abc123aa

Originally posted by wer at 2005-7-14 09:05 PM:

好像是門前射入

對~

abc123aa

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-14 09:11 PM:
同埋解決這問題其實唔難,唔放走摩連或...

冇頭咪用腳囉,皇馬就算買前鋒都唔會買高大型,就算買羅賓奴都係冇頭搥嫁啦= ="

ciger

當對方打密集時地波或中腰波往往過唔到後防,身為強隊應該有多元化進攻方法,而且頭搥攻門乃足球基本功,等於打籃球你都要有外圍同內線啦!皇馬頭搥入波,除左施丹外,其餘都係後防球員,咁樣另碧咸的作大大減低

abc123aa

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-15 12:12 AM:
當對方打密集時地波或中腰波往往過唔...

咁唯有多試遠射或係禁區外搏下罰球囉~_~"

ciger

其實講到這裡,可以總結一句,若果皇馬冇合適球員同碧咸配合,碧咸永遠冇法打回在曼聯時我水準,其七旋斬冇退化,但當隊友把握唔到,你斬到天花龍鳳都冇用,因為勝負關鍵係要入波,而罰球皇馬本身有施丹,卡路士甚至之前嘅費高,有碧咸同冇碧咸只係多個選擇,冇你都唔洗死,所以係皇馬你見唔到碧咸嘅重要性
皇馬係要爭標嘅球隊,唔好話輸,和多幾場都唔掂,只靠球員個人質素而冇整體戰術好容易比人死守完場,甚至靠突擊贏埋添,正因為咁碧咸加盟兩年皇馬反而一個奬都冇
可能因為我係皇馬球迷,睇見都心翕,想佢買人實事求是,而唔係為開拓市場,唔同其他球迷見佢3大皆空反而掩住半邊嘴笑講風谅話

abc123aa

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-15 02:12 AM:
其實講到這裡,可以總結一句,若果皇馬...

但係碧咸既罰球成功率比費高同卡路士高好多喎= ="
我都希望皇馬攞到冠軍....

ciger

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-15 02:48:

但係碧咸既罰球成功率比費高同卡路士高好多喎= ="
我都希望皇馬攞到冠軍....

睇唔出

abc123aa

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-15 02:50 AM:

睇唔出

你睇下卡路士係皇馬射入左幾多球罰球先(碧咸黎左之後),
而費高係碧咸黎到之後根本未射入過罰球~咁可以睇到邊個既罰球技術較高

ciger

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-15 03:09:

你睇下卡路士係皇馬射入左幾多球罰球先(碧咸黎左之後),
而費高係碧咸黎到之後根本未射入過罰球~咁可以睇到邊個既罰球技術較高

卡路士通常罰球路程較遠,所以入球率較低係理所當然,而費高係碧咸黎之後射罰球同出場次數都減少,就算3人入球率係碧咸最高亦唔見得高好多,而冇碧咸皇馬亦根本唔憂冇人射罰球
另外唔通你見到碧咸一季除左入幾個罰球就滿足,唔想有更多球員可同佢擦出火花?這就是因為碧咸而睇皇馬同鍾意皇馬而睇皇馬嘅分別

abc123aa

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-15 03:48 AM:

卡路士通常罰球路程較遠,所以入球率...

就算你係鍾意一隊球隊都會因為某球員先會鍾意某球隊啦,除非果隊球隊既作風你非常鍾意啦~
我唔會因為碧咸入幾球罰球先滿足,因為佢做到既野的確唔多,唔係話唔想佢同其他球隊擦出火花,其實佢已經同球隊開始有火花~你一直都話前鋒冇頭搥就發揮唔到佢既傳送,但係事實係唔係咁???,就算皇馬既前鋒有頭搥都唔會開放右邊出波啦,再加上以前碧咸係曼聯出波都唔會全部係頭搥頂入啦~