HansChan

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-14 10:37 PM:

你話係皇馬要球隊就佢,但係皇馬季初...

唉...
講真.....
不過你又可以話冇甘比較....
朴智星同碧咸...邊個踼得好啲吖???
明眼人都一眼睇得出啦!(雖然位置有啲唔同.....但若佢哋同一隊, 只可選一個.......有腦既都選朴智星!)
碧咸而家係好平庸(我覺得!可能因佢好耐都唔係踼右中場啦!但佢既實力下滑係事實!)
你講得岩呀! 佢踼返右中場係好好多呀, 因係佢相對地善長既位嘛!
但同當年比呢??
而家話選足球先生喎! 何得何能呀佢??
我之前既post講既嘢....我覺得係甘囉!佢唔射十二碼係全球支持英格蘭既球迷福氣, 反英格蘭既球迷惡夢! 佢唔再係必然正選, 對球隊係好事!(我唔係你話我話到佢一冇事處甘呀!!)
至於盲唔盲目哩吓嘢就見仁見志啦.........
但好多人都依然記住佢以前所謂顛峰時間既嘢黎諗佢而家就係事實!
朗拿度98世盃決賽點解要出吖???????
我唔係話事情必定一樣......但會有相似地方囉!
(如twins哩啲垃圾.....你唔俾歌佢唱你估會點吖???????有啲嘢唔多唔少都係造出來的!)
重申! 我只係覺得碧咸踼得平庸.....唔係話佢一冇是處!

[ Last edited by HansChan on 2005-10-14 at 11:00 PM ]

清揚

Originally posted by HansChan at 2005-10-14 22:57:

唉...
講真.....
不過你又可以話...

好收喇真系~費事又有人話你踩breakham ar,breakham真系一個禍水,次次罵戰皆因佢而起........

abc123aa

Originally posted by HansChan at 2005-10-14 10:57 PM:

唉...
講真.....
不過你又可以話...

先生,我冇話佢依家可以當選世界足球先生,我只係講返佢d野,冇話佢應該當選,如果佢當選我會覺得好低能囉
如果朴智星同碧咸比,計返全盛一定係碧咸好d,朴智星都唔可以做到場場助攻雲佬啦,罰球都唔得啦,碧咸係度既時候曼聯明顯係勁d,
我冇話你話到佢一冇是處,只不過有d野你係講得唔啱啫,碧咸係英格蘭既地位如何大家都知,我相信球壇唔會個個都係盲既,碧咸唔掂會唔會比正選佢呀,雖然佢唔係球王級,但我覺得佢係一個好球員就夠啦,平唔平庸就見仁見智,我覺得佢做到助攻,幫到球隊已經夠

abc123aa

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-10-14 11:00 PM:

好收喇真系~費事又有人話你踩breakham ar,breakham真系一個禍水,次次罵戰皆因佢而起........

講事實就唔會咁啦,hans講你又搭咀

HansChan

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-14 11:04 PM:

先生,我冇話佢依家可以當選世界足球...

老兄!
我一開波都係話"選碧咸做足球先生好可笑!"甘既意思!
我理得你有冇話佢可以做足球先生吖!
激啲講.....選既人係盲目!
你要衞護碧咸, okay! (我講佪比喻, 而家要朴智星定碧咸,你就連而家既朴智星同'以前'既碧咸你都講埋, 然後就點都一定係碧咸好.....唉......我老豆廿年前踼精工, 佢而家連我都扭唔過呀!)
唉.......討論吓啫.......唔駛啫住人啫到甘行.......(唔好誤會!! 只係話回應乜都好.....講完咪算囉!)
大家都有自己認為o架啦!

[ Last edited by HansChan on 2005-10-14 at 11:13 PM ]

Lap Hui

Originally posted by HansChan at 2005-10-14 10:57 PM:

唉...
講真.....
不過你又可以話...

碧咸踼得平庸 此點我不認同,應該比平庸好一點吧!!

ciger

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-10-14 22:25:

拾人牙慧??又乜鬼詞匯ar,因我以前讀國際school so我中文底子有限,請解答~

真係唔知係真唔識定假唔識,當我蝕底d喇,拾人牙慧即係俗語跟人口水尾
原來你以前讀國際school ,唔怪得個種咁'雜'啦

abc123aa

Originally posted by HansChan at 2005-10-14 11:12 PM:
老兄!
我一開波都係話"選碧咸做足球先生好可笑!"甘既意思!
我理得你有冇話佢可以做足球先生吖!
激啲講.....選既人係盲目!
你要衞護碧咸, 冇人理你! (我講佪比喻, 而家要朴智星定碧咸,你就連而家既朴智星同'以前'既碧咸你都講埋, 然後就點都一定係碧咸好.....唉......我老豆廿年前踼精工, 佢而家連我都扭唔過呀!)
唉.......討論吓啫.......唔駛啫住人啫到甘行.......
大家都有自己認為o架啦!

你一開波係咁講係我誤會你,ok?
不過討論落去就變左唔係咁,其實明眼人都知冇可能選到,講出黎都幾廢話下,
我係講緊全盛,唔係講緊依家既朴智星同以前既碧咸呀,況且依家既碧咸就算打返曼聯都未必會打得差,
最緊要佢發揮到佢個位啫,唔好又將佢放係防中就得啦,

唔係我一定要幫碧咸,係你地唔係講事實啫,你地下下當佢超級球星咁,佢傳下波幫到隊友比人讚又話佢傳兩下波就可以做英雄,咁有咩野可以再講呢???
唔係下下都係話碧咸好,我都講左n咁多次嫁啦,你地講事實絕對冇問題,我都會一齊講,你老豆廿年前踢乜關我鬼事咩,唔係下下都係我嘈先,你唔知以前發生咩事啫,知道你就唔會咁講啦,呢度d人唔係盲嫁,kobe同米尼都唔係,如果真係我嘈先,真係碧咸唔掂既話我地都唔會係度理論咁耐
唔通碧咸比人讚就係唔應該???下下話佢唔及以前,咁施丹夠唔及以前啦,又點呀???

abc123aa

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-14 11:17 PM:

真係唔知係真唔識定假唔識,當我蝕底d喇,拾人牙慧即係俗語跟人口水尾
原來你以前讀國際school ,唔怪得個種咁'雜'啦

係囉,唔怪得佢咁鬼醒目啦原來係讀國際學校

HansChan

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-14 11:19 PM:

你一開波係咁講係我誤會你,ok?
不...

你仲係黎得甘激......
你口口聲聲話"其他人講既唔係事實, 係事實就會一齊講......"
乜嘢係事實?!
响你之前講既嘢......."碧咸係好!"就係事實.....(只係總括你既語詞!)
係你"認為"...唔係"事實"!
邊有標準o架!
我"認為" "碧咸係廢物中既廢物!!! 連李健和都不如!!!"
如何???????
係我"認為"....我相信既"事實".....甘點?
(若你要話我之前一個好causal既reply講咗一句"講事實啫!"....甘我更正"講我認為既事實啫!!")
我老豆廿年前踼乜梗係唔關你事啦! 只係你之前話全盛時期既碧咸(而家唔係, 將來未發生.....甘即係以前啦!)同而家既朴智星黎簡.......甘我咪比喻我老豆廿年後既今日連我都扭唔過呀甘囉!
一句甘簡單既問題"簡朴智星定碧咸?"
你認為碧咸咪碧咸囉.....
又話乜嘢"朴智星都唔乜乜乜啦!"
甘又點呀??
問題係overview黎問......(overview, 我覺得而家朴智星係好過碧咸十倍左右!)
你既反應係要揾嘢出黎證實碧咸好呀! 朴智星都唔係下下甘好o架......
唉........又點吖?!
各人有各人喜好啦!
我之前講英格蘭對波蘭冇咗碧咸好表現好多.....
同一場波....你鍾意既可以話冇咗碧咸一池死水o架!
鍾意講咪講到夠囉!
唔好吓吓攞"事實"掛响口邊.......你講好多嘢都將你"認為"當做事實.....
又要講埋晒啲"全球球迷都係盲既咩?"證實我講既唔係事實....
唔係事實黎o架!
事實响邊啫?
我係認為大多球迷都盲目喎.....我point out咗點解喎!
甘你認為唔係咪唔係囉!
成熟啲啦!
唔駛下下都要啫到甘行.......
衝住黎既!
又話我唔知之前發生乜事所以就點點點......
我係唔知o架!但唔代表你講既嘢人人都認同嘛!(我冇話你岩定錯呀!!)
唉.......岩聽咪講多兩句......唔岩聽咪第二度講過囉!
駛乜甘啫!