Xtravagant

RR: If you look at Horford and then take a look at Lopez, you'd know what I mean. I'm not lying when I said I don't want to trade him, but just because it is you I'm willing to trade him away...however, not for such a low price.

Rated-R

原帖由 Xtravagant 於 2009-1-3 11:15 PM 發表


I don't think you can even get T.chandler with J.Oneal...so how is it possible for me to accept your 1 v 1 proposal...?

I give you a decent C with consistent blks. You need to give some benefit to  ...

咁就咪trade喇,我對Bobs係Mario + Tyson VS JO + Will.C,當中的Tyson VS Jo已交了保險,你而家仲叫我補你差價,不如去波波池搵執金

Xtravagant

原帖由 Rated-R 於 2009-1-3 11:26 PM 發表

咁就咪trade喇,我對Bobs係Mario + Tyson VS JO + Will.C,當中的Tyson VS Jo已交了保險,你而家仲叫我補你差價,不如去波波池搵執金

我吾知你所講既保險係咩。

Xtravagant

原帖由 Rated-R 於 2009-1-3 11:26 PM 發表

咁就咪trade喇,我對Bobs係Mario + Tyson VS JO + Will.C,當中的Tyson VS Jo已交了保險,你而家仲叫我補你差價,不如去波波池搵執金

我勸你咪貪平貨簽Tyson。。。(ranking 150-200)
到時吾得你又要換。If Tyson, I rather keep J.Oneal.

[ 本帖最後由 Xtravagant 於 2009-1-3 11:42 PM 編輯 ]

Rated-R

原帖由 Xtravagant 於 2009-1-3 11:41 PM 發表


我勸你咪貪平貨簽Tyson。。。(ranking 150-200)
到時吾得你又要換。If Tyson, I rather keep J.Oneal.

你有一家企業並有兩個仔,一個頭腦簡單,但仍有力成人材
一個天賦很高,但週身頑疾,可能30 age 就要老婆守寡
你會倚重誰接你班???

Xtravagant

原帖由 Rated-R 於 2009-1-3 11:50 PM 發表

你有一家企業並有兩個仔,一個頭腦簡單,但仍有力成人材
一個天賦很高,但週身頑疾,可能30 age 就要老婆守寡
你會倚重誰接你班???

我選擇放棄拒地兩個﹐情願將家業交比個有能力又值得信賴之人: "Brook Lopez 或以上既C"
我組隊方針係貴精不貴多。Tyson = Waiver material this season...

但如果拒打翻起既話﹐我ng介意去再簽拒。但而家無為做白老鼠。

[ 本帖最後由 Xtravagant 於 2009-1-4 12:02 AM 編輯 ]

Rated-R

原帖由 Xtravagant 於 2009-1-3 11:59 PM 發表


我選擇放棄拒地兩個﹐情願將家業交比個有能力又值得信賴之人: "Brook Lopez 或以上既C"
我組隊方針係貴精不貴多。Tyson = Waiver material this season...

但如果拒打翻起既話﹐我ng介意去再簽拒。但而家無為做白老鼠 ...

我都系咁想,但請賢者入陣務必付出對等代價,那我救人不如信下自己D仔

R-Star

原帖由 fantesticming05 於 2009-1-3 06:02 PM 發表
鍾意啦... 聽兩句就投左果d人我想知諗緊咩就真

有幾唔公平唔該講清楚

講到allen連nate robinson都不如既唔該係Fa執多個出黎睇下

Gasol頂盡都係round2尾round3頭, 唔洗下下捧到人上天掛...

個trade攪左勁耐...  ...

Gasol頂盡都係round2尾round3頭... 依點絕對認同, 之前durant打得差時想trade佢(gasol)都覺得玩唔過
可能真係名氣問題 (另一原因就係barnes打bench... 唔好話番我個trade , 晚晚做到2-3點d nba news都out out地, 依個trade雖然你好少少, 但真係好明顯各取所需, 可能真係上面兩個原因被veto )

我le2 用westbrook, augustin, mayo, gay, aldridge換okafor, cp3... 被人veto左都唔知咩事, 原來d人覺得我over-pay
之後westbrook轉做fernandez trade倒, 而家le2隊波真係好強

所以你轉左ridnour應該冇人再有say

話時話, 究竟我地le係咪有人專責veto, 已經接近第3個唔算unfair o既trade俾人veto

Rated-R

我得兩條路,
1.用得JO 1日得1日
2.平平地又不影響其他核心為主旨送佢走

點解會咁,拜4位大佬所賞

R-Star

原帖由 Xtravagant 於 2009-1-3 11:20 PM 發表
RR: If you look at Horford and then take a look at Lopez, you'd know what I mean. I'm not lying when I said I don't want to trade him, but just because it is you I'm willing to trade him away...howeve ...

you are right to compare lopez with horford in certain extent (stats)
the only difference is trading value

thus if i am still keeping lopez , i will keep using him instead of trading him since he is somehow under-rated
even if he plays suck eventually, the gain still outweighs the potential loss