奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
2 H$ \" j, s0 T
8 v' j* h# Q' E: F0 C+ sagree,; Q) A, Q$ D' R
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
, a1 r4 J& {2 v7 F6 M: e( s; `但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,. ~: @3 o6 o) W+ A
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

- i; Z! c: Q  M: z' N8 s$ vhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html) Q  ?8 P8 |& W, A
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地! E9 V! |) U. |1 `0 c& e$ c
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
/ l( }( F9 q7 H9 R& q* u# n( p2 VJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:4 f3 |1 Y9 v. P% k9 Q& m
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ ' o5 a4 i& ~8 A! {' i

; {' N/ B& C6 ]係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
! b/ L4 v( i3 k4 X, g5 \8 L' A! K7 e: }
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

# E( O% t7 u9 m. f* l  b3 r% y0 t& V
絕對支持啦
' Q4 |2 \2 ]; ?: }: h2 p0 r# g" R/ M  z$ D8 n1 w
有錯就認,打就企定
( T( N0 \; h6 o# V, c4 `& N9 M! d6 I* b1 H; y5 B
無錯當然要撐到底
/ z) U, p6 Z/ E" r
: n" N: y4 X" K9 k- Y但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩9 ?4 u7 S1 r& P1 T4 c# l. w
. B) Y) b, d6 P6 z& d
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
$ K8 v* a  V: D4 [. v  A% r: p3 D$ t4 ~. k  e3 S  e+ f
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力5 x" t% y, @) d2 v  }0 d& a& F7 [

8 U  l" O3 I0 s9 s3 p/ C: L我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
9 c" ]- C7 i+ a7 q# C& D! c
/ x8 U8 w' _, @# g! C% ]- I0 K唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
( _: M0 Y9 r2 j2 U- x, ^. V# L
2 c+ [$ k2 C1 m) q我唔認為lor
$ _4 Z) d# Q. A  U3 w$ P: Z; `' W+ x; h9 X4 s3 s9 s0 ?, \9 f
唔係話要整死佢地
2 u8 W  ]5 X) L
& t3 f9 K: M& {而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
; t) |5 t$ o2 k1 Y( S) n! r! X
4 v. h8 t, I) a: [; ]+ `" B$ J/ O我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大/ \. l1 M( w+ K5 q9 ^5 g
4 S  Z& d* D* m, J4 i6 @7 \
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的: i: f/ t- G$ k& G$ B$ Z5 X

3 ]6 f3 u7 I" X* n4 B$ _$ ]唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由: |& E- ~, t4 x6 D, Q6 E- O

# ^$ O4 S: a3 z/ }& ~1 T大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
% Y! g) U9 K1 F4 c) L: n2 t"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"- e) j  P9 O3 V' l
0 m8 h' p, @" P1 u2 y
我們的大學生. a. q8 }) u% {

( W5 t5 ^. L- N4 f$ h& q. o, ~) F0 ~( u
$ p- U- S1 ^' C7 b( n' w
3 ~& a# j4 |4 e2 j8 I8 d

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
( s" _$ W# L% ]- }9 H1 B
5 ]* D( m# ^  l: U4 C; t; l! G1 n0 `
有見地 !!!
* n' D& X9 a  J7 S' c現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html- w! [1 b5 c) ?1 C/ M
  O) t5 i) Y' C2 ?; e7 y
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
6 {$ K) C5 o; K& k7 t; sI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
) f& N  X8 x" W3 a( v% a0 i+ II pretty sad that about the University official.
: P' f. _# {4 Y% c' K9 w7 z) FIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
# v& \+ S' ~  E0 q# J3 S4 I& j8 K7 h; J* `$ |, W4 u
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:4 C( @! e8 W9 c: n% p, L7 d# h  S
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la1 l# U, g  h* [; a5 X

3 b4 p8 X& [4 a: [( A+ v- n6 I[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

2 s" F8 j* K+ x6 s
' K1 F4 s- R5 W% y兩者有何分別?5 i! E$ q8 N: j4 @  ~3 C
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?