奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
4 M7 G+ @" z" \8 f& n1 c/ B- C$ h) @, m  _' S+ j/ W1 U( f
agree,
. n" r6 c2 O7 O! g6 d我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
6 S# q9 b9 U/ L. I但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,4 ]; z; o  Y5 e& P6 k
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

# S/ n1 |2 H' m7 l
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html! U) `1 f8 }7 r; E
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地3 O# F; |! `- ~1 y* B9 X' {( e
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
6 V# W5 _. p: H5 f( `Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:9 J& ?/ g+ s- p' f* Q$ F! q
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
& t, Y" S1 S0 |2 S* U' k
2 ~: a3 U6 h  w6 w& I係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
4 R/ U4 f9 N. ]/ i+ q) Z
, K' h# z7 {2 K* ]8 u# [: R為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

0 I' F/ L8 d! s( p  Y% q
/ x# X6 K3 h$ e1 z' X9 N$ ?, Y- s  q絕對支持啦; g4 j- X6 r- [3 Z6 j+ r, E

- _0 ^6 c( T6 x! U( m) V. q+ [有錯就認,打就企定; Y. c5 u' h2 J7 \% `: ?* \

8 g5 w0 ^. m5 l1 K' C無錯當然要撐到底
3 H3 |; |' L, F1 o6 q  C- e
! H: G) C9 V0 c8 `/ [" \8 v( c; ]但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
- D0 z" @0 K/ s- k! B9 @9 q& w
' M# z3 o: W/ N, B6 V7 P在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得& _- |) K8 N8 t, \7 q# G2 m3 x
4 M/ ~- v  |5 o, ~0 O& z$ i  P5 d
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力0 L' ?/ H0 x& Q1 ]' u7 \+ x7 S
# S( p4 h# U8 L; ?
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生2 H8 W/ S/ e* u  O4 G
0 i( \2 o' C5 Y
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
5 v* a: G- e7 H/ s  }! m3 l
7 D2 @; a6 m+ `$ b; J* j我唔認為lor! Q" v, L& z8 a
* O; Z6 y9 v7 O8 S! c* H
唔係話要整死佢地
  h. ^5 V& Q4 G9 ^' A( D: H4 R( y1 M  N& w2 L
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用$ o5 S8 I; T( @: W+ f1 ^; E

1 f& P% B# T$ }* [我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
8 y0 C, ^7 x$ [. }- q5 E( ?/ M4 S; p# |6 Y5 o
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的) d3 V6 D' i% b0 V1 ^3 B
  I0 e" s3 @* w3 W$ d% |
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由! z: V2 o# K) B" O' U& E
4 G  b4 e3 X) U, c
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句! V1 X6 H% A5 N1 v- g$ |4 q
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
, _$ j/ t  g% w! a* s: Q( N
2 X4 `5 U( q% n6 V3 i我們的大學生
, T1 r3 B, `. x
( J0 G, K0 E  x9 k# Z0 f8 h( o; e7 z" [% p( V0 T
; A5 [7 Q# r1 b! O( y$ D

4 }2 H7 p3 ]4 u: z

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:, P3 B; z3 b7 o- W# b
% @+ d5 d5 A+ l; f- G" U. ^8 Q

; l; {& l4 t- i' Q: v4 _/ _有見地 !!!; \+ r  V5 k& m: A2 p
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html' Q' u7 Y; G, k; U  a

0 P4 p4 h2 N0 G6 b4 z# Y. l' i( jI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.   E" y1 {" r0 J) S3 D8 E+ G
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 6 X7 A( ]+ i6 w  M: m* M1 C# a
I pretty sad that about the University official.
5 Z& M" |+ Y. I2 q; ?) iIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
2 u9 S& O" P' z  F& [3 p  P3 j
; e/ f4 A5 C5 D* d2 q! f[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:! q" @' c$ ]$ Y" [/ Y/ P  k
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la1 P4 k" w4 f; H0 h" V
, e  Z. O# q! q: Y$ T% H
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

' r$ @: m4 _  q/ z+ n  I
) ~* v; `7 D% M( e
兩者有何分別?5 v* i8 l5 R* ^
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?