奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
. u+ U! `' l  _  R3 @7 R$ Q: x
4 h5 U/ h! e  l3 ?agree,
/ Q4 ~" R# E9 {4 U% G6 q我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
# O+ F! k: o% c2 C% j但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,. B- q8 N" _3 q
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

9 {$ X9 h. O, s' ~# C" Bhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html2 O  [- H; |1 }/ o, S
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地0 X- s# b! M5 b! ~: f7 |% y
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
" b1 T9 E0 u& v$ fJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
* G# |; k  B0 v5 B; `/ I1 {6 U有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
) ?4 x& I& c8 n9 v$ W( V  u
& L- d8 f6 F! {& d- R係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???6 @' b8 j( ?4 B/ q) X: o

. C+ W7 Z& G4 Y8 v" |, a為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

' q" `: A  G5 p+ _% e
8 A2 A6 v) Y! I" `0 p7 f! ]! }絕對支持啦5 s4 j6 B/ j# W6 @' q# Y, _2 |9 @% Y
! z; A! `% w9 n- H3 S* e- T
有錯就認,打就企定
; M1 ^/ a* m7 b7 E4 k
8 ?5 _3 i5 `# |2 W$ j# h7 b無錯當然要撐到底
& r$ c( K6 x1 Q# Z" C* x* B. T
$ ^, ^7 A: `% {3 @' g但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩0 A8 j1 m) `- C' }

- J% P7 O9 N: |5 {+ V# d在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
: y& m- c- ^" U* ~8 G% N- j, w; F& `  s; O* K. u1 J" }
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
5 ?4 _1 s3 z2 q7 f3 J0 g' Q8 z( W3 o) `/ G8 A6 v' V  Q
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
4 Y! }- z3 P- Y7 @* x# j4 J+ v
2 p: J8 o! `' g" T唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
2 O9 m. ^% O# q
6 ?0 A3 s* D: L, g- g' P我唔認為lor  D  c9 C8 Z& t1 C' |
1 W& V: \3 M% q1 M
唔係話要整死佢地( f3 j1 A) ]0 m- S0 A
8 y9 `/ ~; {) F) K" K, `
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
" ^( O9 Z/ a, Z" A* V
" R/ p5 g) U, P4 o, ~我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大% D% G6 q) G+ K' ]5 p
- P' `0 ~) \; n9 c& r
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
  g- J3 {7 {1 }$ Y' n6 M0 S* D$ e; v2 h! O
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
0 }# s# n1 n9 i% m) \5 w& q3 S  Q% m/ K  E4 @# \
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句# s1 y0 |6 K  F$ G' C3 g9 K
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"7 t7 g  j9 ^1 Z* T* w" n

0 N) S9 q0 w6 X) z8 X) r我們的大學生( Y: x! |% O7 y* Q9 Z0 j8 B# s
' I7 N% d  Y2 ~4 [# X, v

' z# F' A2 e+ R4 g3 ~. F& I2 ~) e% P8 e2 t: q9 N1 ?1 W4 }

# r& w: \: |6 }2 I8 Y

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
; j" K, H- z5 _% m
( W8 M8 w+ e! L
! [  _  v; M, ]4 J. @* b有見地 !!!
1 l, c. [3 V& T6 n8 Q現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
. m7 |/ I' ?( n! A* [
9 v  N+ h: O; T* p1 mI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 6 s0 v7 }8 H7 M( R  q; V2 L
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. : T7 V" {9 ?4 v. m$ I$ V
I pretty sad that about the University official.9 ~8 V9 ~% [/ ^
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
: P# ^/ N, T3 f* f9 Y3 O
& [) \3 d, B# g( k  N[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:! @7 ^* q$ n* H9 X
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
0 `0 x; \  W% a3 h, L) G8 _9 O' Y9 P! U5 n4 U- V* n) M/ n
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

, |6 |3 T1 f! h$ E9 R' z
' n7 K) A4 s5 p
兩者有何分別?1 y( V# r" A8 D0 g( @
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?