|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
1 W2 h$ A4 G e' w* _CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
- S1 i/ Z: j; i, ]- Y4 n6 y: omore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.- b9 u( ^. b! ~3 D0 Q$ y9 X
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
- i% L1 I, z4 u+ Q8 rin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities./ [2 K5 Q7 V" @ r, m1 s
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
% {. G6 r2 ^" ?2 S8 X5 @: F. s/ V) Ksimilar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
) s* b) U# W3 \normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. ; A) r+ S. k: [$ M
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. 3 R w5 g& ]: i G8 Y. Y
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.* p4 A0 S2 Z. _4 O+ G
1 \/ c; [' Y+ J; Q) Y$ N6 zim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.' y3 A. E5 q" l" q4 N# ~9 F$ Y
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.1 Z, m; b6 I+ ^4 A* H
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,# L9 \; h9 O2 ?3 R$ J% i
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
8 [* \! U3 r& ^) s w2 yThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
0 Q) D; n6 l, L, |but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.( f! q& m. i1 q1 ~) z4 |3 D- k
, k' U* G% h- w/ b6 `: I% J, d& r[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|