|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
( n; ?+ Q) U2 TCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
1 d2 {& ]8 `8 N* }0 a/ Fmore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
! o0 }# q. _$ B' k1 i# Z% Pmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return," A9 t) ^. p T2 D6 T8 z
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities., C4 F5 g5 H; X* V/ m( m1 ]
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.3 l1 U1 }# [* S8 H
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
- Z$ b5 E G% F: i7 G: Tnormally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. 6 M0 Y# Q' g8 M8 G: X7 |
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
7 T$ |* f& f* w0 H, Jbanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
5 r9 o& Y/ ?" I( U; r4 k# j. U' t/ l% e: Z$ d
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.8 O5 a) |1 m7 s- K* b% a
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.* K% m. L( w! g" d8 j7 T1 j4 [
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
# C# F/ l/ r6 [1 j& YA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
7 y# L7 V( J* T* c; CThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. ( T/ t6 ]4 l4 U
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
- Y4 y, R3 M5 E p- O0 N) X3 K$ B6 }+ q4 f7 O- P. n+ a! t4 r- y
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|