|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return." E7 b. r I: n" A( L
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
. _ X. X4 W6 V8 ?, U: pmore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
3 X5 _, u/ g; L9 B+ V5 J' Xmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,* S- L3 p/ M- i- O
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities." u; o c' s) a& F+ l, e" |
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.' E" m* r9 U+ a. T# f1 A
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
, N0 L& q N4 i }# m7 X Onormally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. : l8 @) C% I2 f# e
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. * X1 e" X5 X) d. K9 M
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
1 l+ t( }% U" S* U) U8 A$ c7 p7 N6 H+ l# q% U* {# S
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.* b' Y: X/ N: {7 Y1 K
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
1 m$ o. k( f. ]+ \& ]For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
9 N% t3 u8 h6 C7 `3 u4 L/ GA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction./ q" g& r) r [# w5 C4 ?
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
: q! A' X x3 J: t$ f: A) D0 [, P; ^, ?2 `but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
* r6 j$ C! \$ R( N$ B/ s
# Z7 F" a' ]* ^/ s2 j$ F[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|