|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.% y- _, o! b3 C i# W; c' j
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
# i6 d( g8 r1 }more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.5 t$ [% ]+ M" r* ?- C& g. e
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
% A. y$ A X5 [$ x( L, E/ {5 bin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
7 W3 C- U" _: M. _9 W( X$ c5 iAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.1 P& w* Z2 R: b8 X5 E" Z( d
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,, o- F! M' T6 j" f7 P* v
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. 6 R) x. G' g# Y. K6 A4 b; S
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
' F& }" R" A& w& ibanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
2 H& z) q+ E+ x& n( d& {! x. e$ S1 w% A( Z- v# n# h5 H% J/ f
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
7 e' x! [# Q! Z) jin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards. L5 `' o9 y, m3 o1 g+ O7 S
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
2 u9 p# {5 d. R0 qA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
7 F! Z; |: F$ hThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. & m( Z7 V5 e7 y/ @% c
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.2 Z1 z+ _3 o2 O7 [# O/ _+ ]' x" ]
/ t# E4 S. v$ a# {, M- J5 f( k# E# v& P
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|