|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
+ h* U, ^$ h9 C dCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
$ }, L4 W- W* h9 t# N' dmore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
1 o4 D! q0 `/ ]+ _3 a: Mmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,2 n& y% L; v+ _0 G. B
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
& H1 n2 ~( c! [$ K, G& c* h k' IAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.' d4 |) `2 @$ e' ~" ~
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,$ V, Y) h& a$ `4 x9 J5 g3 r
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
# B( V+ ]" d( R, `5 c7 q% Heg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
# a$ }$ C& n! _ e, wbanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.) f; [# s9 m7 j& `3 B
+ [5 z' \ J9 e* |7 Qim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.1 G' n3 r+ e+ e3 H0 N/ g1 g
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.; M6 S* B7 @% k& |" \9 B( l
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
$ [2 N/ e& {: N$ [0 oA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
' ?$ O: p, E4 `/ _The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. 6 [7 `; x" w) B o; |% [
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.# }% I6 C' Z6 y1 H7 k( A# S
: L, r/ L4 k" b# a# p9 L5 g; y[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|