|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.# n/ N* j Y+ O2 U
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
, V+ f; |; I, D& D5 D' u3 u, k- \more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
, _0 r- e) K0 R9 Gmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,, M# M. N" C6 e5 {5 C. f
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.! |7 E3 {* v- m' n, Z
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.6 ^8 ^; o0 b- u( h4 b* z
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,4 W( g' P; H: s) s5 d0 v) D
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
. v ]. M! [7 I9 Leg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. * l5 j& {% e4 {5 A( _5 k
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party. {" H, B3 f! U/ D6 X' R
" _; g# p! E7 X8 T8 W
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.1 N- ?7 a w2 `4 {
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
5 m0 F; {! y8 W& b: I2 uFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
7 a6 R ?* m) W, x q8 [' PA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction. G$ S) q7 L% N9 \- l0 `
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. 1 l, c0 j$ F+ N& M: W9 W0 ^
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.: K6 Z2 w$ @/ c" F. t; ^- n* J& H
/ _, b7 j- [% C6 @8 |[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|