|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
8 P0 L8 m. h& W$ CCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,/ u( x& W5 C8 F6 z* |4 r
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
/ b/ N, M* w: t" H& w: q) @main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,: E5 X f$ M, N! M
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.+ }# F6 X, O& s2 e" Y
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
, N, k7 e; n, |/ f( \4 L% Tsimilar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
8 e8 {; ]2 u4 o+ O ?+ V, \normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
+ E; a! o+ j0 [4 O1 k6 i5 Xeg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. ; H: ]' b% r" v6 d5 v
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
' C7 }+ |2 s6 ]$ i* W& v' D$ x0 T& V) ^+ p) f# K% V3 s
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.% e' I9 y" ]5 z4 i
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
c3 G' z* v9 j0 `For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,% G" _# M; ?: |0 G3 u3 B" U8 Y. o
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.2 \6 H7 X; y5 d! ~; Y
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
1 D& d; k# J# u5 @4 _but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
! r5 R% d* Z: p7 E: [. U" K. u4 y' y' L7 ~( v9 m% _
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|