|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
% a _" P, ]. OCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
7 T& r+ p0 a% y7 Amore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
% Z5 v! N2 X6 _9 Amain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,, K+ e+ L/ A2 ?$ s& j# z
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.; `) Z# S% S f
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.2 T; i6 w/ z& S0 M. R
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,. `+ s7 y* z/ I* z: p- p
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. + {' u, A. I6 M6 y' d
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. 8 T& T! L) ^$ N% K, s7 U
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.. C6 M: \ g t& z
9 R! K2 \6 X. l) X. @) P/ ]im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.& `; n3 j: _4 l0 I {+ d
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
) }' n. W5 g# ~8 z: f' t" rFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,: _' e; I# ]* g7 R& G5 A1 x
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.# K9 U* _: ]; G2 l" b
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
# Q% @8 h! J' \- Z* Ubut the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
7 q7 B& v3 E0 x7 m `$ P+ }7 Z
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|