|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return., T8 E# j5 i/ Y W3 {# k0 x
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
+ L" p$ W; S( }+ \more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
& q* H i, v7 h) c5 t: amain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,( r2 T: O: z) @ E. D7 R
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.8 F+ y3 d# L- B( M# g
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.6 _3 k g, H7 O' J6 f+ ~: l
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,3 ~- I$ u2 Q, ^, r" i b1 x7 O
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. * t' e9 i& g5 @) t" C9 B5 c
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
2 j) M% o, v& m2 |! A5 y2 ^banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.4 u; ?) X' R6 Q4 T+ ?
$ t6 h# F x4 _im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
0 ~2 g8 o: E9 v0 ~% Qin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
: S5 e, ^" p2 l( }: t8 }0 U$ gFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
$ d: K( N! z& h: uA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
) B9 S6 I# V: e7 `The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
/ d5 @9 i3 I4 R' Z4 [but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.( Y( _- t. f0 c6 v! I1 s* v( d
& ~/ b A4 Z! q[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|