|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
/ E+ l% M& N- u" \8 p" O* L7 VCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
; E0 O. ]. @( O' U6 gmore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.6 {# G" k$ n# d! \, q7 l# P( K
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,& {4 {( l: o. O+ F. S
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.8 t2 Y4 Z& N% X+ g
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.8 @, ~2 s4 a$ E$ E
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
3 f5 a; _$ @: m4 d- _3 F4 E; Cnormally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
' b) M. J# t; v. A- b& L7 ^eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. 5 Z1 v9 _9 T3 j# S
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
% W& R- e# o, @, |9 e8 p% _8 z# d
- l- W' O$ d1 p( Him not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
% c9 D% r% ^# g( A1 b* Gin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
- ^. s' W+ G- N4 G% w$ B$ QFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
1 P) F0 P$ T+ {. F( f! WA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
. M& o% }) r4 E) o/ }% [, lThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. ! R+ S- k2 C( V+ H+ ?* g* k
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
" P( [& O6 I; E4 P; x5 Z7 B6 H$ P/ }) C6 j. n% X# Z
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|