|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
4 o K0 Z' Y0 u: I9 v: V3 _ iCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
/ ] d' a; }7 W! J5 zmore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
; C, r( G, E( r5 N+ m$ z2 }2 zmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,: T% f; h- U- O
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
! k. \7 l- d) a( s1 EAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
( I% S9 ]( H" l) F) y0 g2 B9 Jsimilar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
0 }9 D; C5 @+ g! y2 F8 Tnormally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
& a8 _; r4 z$ I( T* w/ Q1 m* {eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
( ?) h. M t' C: T9 r5 Xbanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
8 @% ] Q5 |, d k: b- P& H- n. J( ]) s6 X
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.: Z- }9 F3 j. L9 Q" E5 M$ R) D
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards., J, S9 q' U6 k( ^* O
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
* m+ W3 m" U( CA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
! j4 C% z4 P3 b1 M1 O; r* LThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. - }( ^2 j+ {( `7 H) p% x) E
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.; L6 \- h* t' V7 \# [6 ^. x
7 y+ S7 Y G' Q7 G6 p! R[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|