|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.8 M7 j, D" Z/ X) B4 e
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
}! v! ^1 z9 ~8 g6 emore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
" [& Y! T* y! J V3 }main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,- S$ o, D( a6 u' F; v
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.# ~& C/ I% w5 M- V) m
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.7 \+ ?4 \3 |& B/ E
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times," [- Y1 ^0 m& @$ @
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. 5 E/ N9 \5 y0 U
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. 4 z4 ] |. l. J+ [* g
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.7 v* O* F4 z6 V5 F( V
- T1 _, M7 ^4 P8 h, L" vim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
, \9 ~2 W* O0 w* x; R' `' Iin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
' l2 H! M+ x0 m4 q- uFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,& ~( A2 d5 v$ z
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.! y' v! {( ^5 L" l; Q
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. X: x- G; @! h' f5 U0 U3 d% y- D3 v
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
6 W7 u8 W1 c- g2 Y6 @$ M) h
: v, w# _3 {* A3 B+ G5 z[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|