|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.8 d0 z/ y, Q% l: F0 }& q
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,5 t- F& x5 i0 o1 J( ?
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment." v4 G; K/ C0 {; A6 ?
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
( i/ m. G: w7 s. A Bin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.4 O4 j6 U }3 I& H/ Z! q1 N
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
- q" r4 W* W0 X, \" Osimilar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
0 w. Z" J4 ~. V/ t6 o, z3 o/ wnormally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. - X8 l; C. T/ l* t
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
4 B. ~& e& m% qbanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
5 q1 \7 b; d2 W5 T. y3 c' J8 E
" \9 z9 O5 d- j6 g7 Xim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.2 N6 d, z: ? r8 A5 ]- \: U
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.7 ~7 T9 T8 c4 i; s1 r- J/ N' K
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
+ s" I, Z+ _' I' m; x* C2 H' l) `! EA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.2 o; b9 m2 r7 { ^
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
! v9 | I! u2 g8 |# ybut the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
* s9 n" e) {% ], J" m: f5 I& H# Q3 \- f% I& @; _3 {9 s
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|