|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
0 c7 j3 `% H( {, s g7 E8 z; hCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
! I/ F9 I& E: h3 n& V5 F/ [more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.! o. X4 y/ S- J o
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
& i3 P/ O$ |; }% ]in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.3 O+ l8 N/ {8 J; E: Z- q+ w. s
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
& Q" u n; Q( osimilar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,$ C; p. c& [' H( S0 Z% F1 G
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
" B8 {* T7 S7 H% Z7 Geg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. 1 r) s# I: ?/ i$ O, ]( N
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.7 x9 G/ V6 D, n- K6 \2 F
( w) p( k5 m; F1 F3 [* T5 @; Wim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
* ^+ _( @2 S% s* ^! \% w# G% Tin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
7 G8 z/ v" N" C0 q* _For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
2 ]# F7 T4 F% Z# z! i( q5 WA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
/ m4 y+ f; ~ A; ZThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
) r5 B( ^8 G: D! P# D! I% c- @but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.) ?! O/ s6 f. W: K
: @, v0 K# ~4 b4 O9 }/ ?[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|