|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
7 B5 g1 c9 p. h& h0 `& g- nCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
8 E. X# Q" s, X5 D% Bmore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
) c+ a( t4 [" h% omain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,& d t# _0 O. T: [. Q
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.2 y+ F, Y' j, L, _" r8 Q8 t. f
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
$ a$ L C- y z( ]( Tsimilar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
; X) q% x# ~; X; W# G( mnormally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. 9 K# z8 b+ [ q. }8 f* m; B
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
& I3 K& L* n- Y5 ~* dbanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.! a5 c$ |+ j+ V0 X( p
& k1 }7 d/ ?3 Y" c+ jim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
/ \4 G7 }" F; t; P( R9 F3 Gin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
! D. y- d4 c& z, T( C$ M. jFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,7 f- f4 p0 ]0 h6 p$ g4 K
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.$ x$ U8 V. \% L$ S. s
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
, O$ X" {! V( V, F/ abut the value of their assets did really drop significantly.# m5 A1 ~% {9 M% }( j
% Z1 n1 V: ^. l+ S; i: J[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|