Rika

由最好排到最壞9 C  t+ N& I) D" k
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong7 D& a$ D( J" H( X- X+ C
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount  |, H7 C' q+ D6 E/ ]. V$ D( R
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her0 q! Z* r6 u. L. o: Q) b
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
/ z1 Y, ]  H$ D" K* V- d2 q- y! ]+ ?L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:; a1 @% ^1 o0 q3 W# }+ D+ t
% o5 G& l. I! `6 Q! K2 p
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人' b  F6 s/ F2 b/ m$ ^* x7 b

9 P, \2 G. T! O* ]S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
# x4 q. L1 J" l* ?- _8 l! p     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
1 v( J' \& y" ~! T" u) v; V% y/ f8 z& B! a& V4 ]
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
- z$ \: C, P' b4 z9 B( @# u7 t6 D* D2 J, B
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
1 @+ @; w( w& x; O' ^1 r$ {6 v% @! q
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
; g+ }8 n, g( Z' T, y     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好$ I' f0 ?, V1 q

4 ]# }7 O- g' \+ z# H[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
9 W' i* m* R; q/ a而家答多次$ A2 J5 k& k/ l$ R: b
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
6 W8 f  h5 l6 d' F. T' Il: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
; g6 l$ X7 `) n, {' V. H+ s4 Y, ?2 yb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
- M4 J) X( J6 U7 is: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.. @: ^+ R: o8 C
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S: h6 R, T, Q/ r: a
7 o# I* B- X+ S1 U) a& e
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大* z! N  J, X  m  M2 m5 @3 F
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
4 q5 L: `" c& V1 V' JM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
0 P8 G; C3 l( XS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
) |1 i6 _+ X5 Q4 O: O+ u5 R# hB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
. I) R; W( C8 K( N  XF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
& ?) l( y3 _) V- e) SS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取- j5 K: d9 n. f+ D  E+ n0 H
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
( \% L* [5 x1 {. f# H5 nL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
# z( ~4 f! }# B, b8 pB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
4 O" d- o6 a! g" B5 z6 M/ F% K) ~. d+ n/ T+ L" L
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:. K8 P5 A% L; `) u+ @/ O" v
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己! L! t7 w: O1 P% V. R% ?1 M! ]" a
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
4 }" j, p2 w0 y4 O- _S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
8 C0 R7 T8 J: r7 y0 oF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方9 E+ ?; h0 X+ Q: \( h- k. J
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

0 a. k0 P, L. ^; K. Y0 T
" T% V+ T( `# s! l' {: Y
same choices with u , but want to add some comments 8 h+ U" m6 k# a& ^
, R( ~4 p6 W) e, L. R) O1 l) B
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  4 l8 a1 c5 I( u! I7 ~  ^
  l6 O% I% P5 |, `+ ]. Z; x# k0 F) ]
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )/ I/ O2 Z2 z# H: w* h
( [; l1 D6 e. U' }
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome / ^% ]# O* N' C2 P
9 a5 E4 F) N  z
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......( V: E6 w& p; p$ n9 v) U( E4 [* C. S
$ h7 [& U7 V# X  E/ m  `
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge' \" ?8 {/ J8 q, d
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢6 e6 a  N! }- D' K5 i
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點; n9 v  J. G, X) _
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma1 g" |; f( Z* Q' h% E! j" o) Y

: O: E2 W% c. O0 n9 }1 j6 V最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
  n* o3 r+ H  w9 x有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
0 d" B# g; `" Q& z由最好開始排起既話，
) b9 p! |0 o' x& ^+ R, FL B M F S 啦，: r! r0 F9 @# B; z

, {% S$ p7 A0 \0 w/ j. c其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
  p7 K2 E; ?3 R! G' R( S! D0 J但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？  G2 E/ S. @% S$ Z( I
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
# s4 b" L4 m* J4 [& h& s3 j又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
+ Q) u9 j# I  ]4 z% d' g
% l2 d$ X7 P; z而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
1 }; @, R' t" t5 [所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，3 X! [' f% z6 g8 _* M
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。/ ~0 g5 v/ i  Y$ \* q% i  \& ]: {
; D& H! R, V5 o; B& a4 U
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，; D& o# J7 v# v1 D
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，9 h" N# x  L2 p
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
1 K7 z7 }/ H; g4 W! j知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
5 O- T3 V: i3 ]2 N  _9 B M 都可算壞了。
; A6 X. I- ^/ p% G
) B+ S$ _3 a* ^" m9 G4 C# l: C0 W F 呢個人仲掂，1 @7 a9 w5 o9 I: `9 g3 c5 v
知道既唔等於要講，
. q7 m: T- F/ H1 w: v3 p& e8 I如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
: m: }' u  k4 ~  x我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
3 k  v" `& R* J# k5 }. J  [, R( D0 `9 ?' i5 H. s
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
/ q' M0 g; G$ K( I5 n始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
% ^- H8 l) W" B2 a% |6 h$ v5 k0 ?5 |2 t
3 @  m0 G4 }6 b- N5 O

3 s3 x; o. ^# d2 l2 M題外話：
: h2 A. @) n1 z% y% Y唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
1 [' e+ _/ D0 z0 ?  R' Y. l1 p" n睇到 S 呢條友，2 h4 O) H! y  |5 {+ l( v
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L- l1 Z5 ~% x5 i( }7 {' `6 c
; v: \# a  I* A" P6 D% g
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
' A  g) p& v5 K' M9 G7 X* x- YF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
) A) f' z5 b  O! S; s9 Q9 Z& bM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
6 g/ ?" Y0 b: u, ~3 |( t  y" [' x3 kB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
5 z1 }9 ?4 L6 a2 ML: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...