Rika

由最好排到最壞
2 k3 W3 }2 b, m8 p6 CF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
+ f, D* v) W5 n! nB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
1 V$ [) l' d/ q& JS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
8 g- J1 E0 [# w: A/ n5 E7 vM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure9 b: Y2 k' S/ }
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:' X  f$ X) B8 V2 I

5 Z8 J7 b8 q. O- i( V9 mM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
2 p$ ~* K+ s$ z, n
, D5 x' ]; Z: DS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)) Z/ t) K( N0 c/ H* q
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!5 w( H; e* Z9 T
6 a9 z) ~" q8 ?( Z3 w! v: Y: k
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做& f1 T. P; ?  ?# e* i5 X$ j
, o& a# g* Y* r9 g1 Q- S! c, s
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
# l+ K4 C8 [9 w! O8 @3 o) ^
3 P% N1 O  h2 z! z! Y1 C: hF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,: L) ~9 s' J8 P- L
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
! z  Q9 U$ y. a7 |- w, y9 i" d# `9 E
" o; @$ A3 R+ ~, [, f0 `9 ?$ `[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
, P* s% u) \" G' O而家答多次
: \7 w, I5 o3 Q, v  L5 S& Sf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽# X9 o, r: K3 F' `4 N
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架  O- D% Y0 P2 s5 M0 K( J$ z
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢8 I! _5 T7 G/ C3 U, s7 R0 H8 g
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
0 [; t& Q% \$ [m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
. @0 P9 G2 l1 ?" C4 Y" q9 _6 {: e' ~! b  f2 I- f3 V& E' |! y
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
/ i8 q- Q( O3 i3 D; _* o" bF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
7 k6 e! a' T. v2 k2 bM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
; r+ H6 F2 `! L4 LS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
+ R- ?0 h( D  h$ A; qB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞& Z$ o1 @* C, y' n- l
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"5 M4 q3 r' h+ e" q1 A$ ~5 P" O; r3 p
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取$ i; h1 a+ H& j% Y" }' O% [( c
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法) v- e9 J% L0 {! ~+ Z
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果  b. e+ X- ~$ |8 |3 I! l7 G% D" G
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
# w5 d1 D- T2 J$ O4 Q: b$ t7 i7 i9 G% ^- A) \1 [$ m. E" |& l8 Q
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:# Z. i! I# M, t0 h6 y
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
" N! S+ d; h3 ~# `B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
& s3 ]' a$ ?# o+ [9 z! `S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
) A" e6 T/ E- t+ Y$ WF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
- u8 ^: l1 x  I4 i: x, HM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

/ `5 R  D# _5 [3 r1 O
9 t: h6 O( N, G" N
same choices with u , but want to add some comments 6 v: B" z8 Y& G% w" H& T( p
3 ~7 R- X0 Y5 @! c7 x% P
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
( u6 g0 Q$ Z4 W8 G( d/ @) Z' _6 _
. q& F* E  l1 _+ i: f+ KS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )& b- V4 d3 A$ z$ o; P

( o" F3 y9 q0 NF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 7 A& [7 }- D) b0 z& F
7 G: }! i9 V7 k; W- u, U
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
" B: o* r. l) M  D& p) b) I& b+ }2 D9 v2 k/ y' V
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
+ o, \. Y- m6 z* M$ l- b) u9 tM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
1 F0 C4 `' U7 `8 H* _& H" [& c+ nL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點9 ~  K) a7 i$ Y& K
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma+ |% W3 u+ x+ f# v1 X% v8 y

  N* z6 `! d# I2 p最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....* D9 o# ?# e; c1 n  D
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，7 \4 z1 i* t' w2 d  R
由最好開始排起既話，( `( j" Q5 K& i/ a, W5 {) N
L B M F S 啦，
. F7 {; r; t+ W7 l- |3 Q1 w. h3 e' W) L$ j
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
3 l" W& g: w/ K% Q9 c1 u但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
. b( ?2 T0 C4 @0 n( a如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
+ I" _5 g' F* D又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
5 F  ?2 w' Q  i/ z' r
0 }2 C3 B% L8 P( f7 ^8 z) L而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，4 Z- U/ t1 a) z' [; S, ]
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，+ M0 B3 u1 p1 \. b, `* C- m
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
  f5 U% N- O3 q1 f' h$ c  I1 b" U
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，6 c* c: H+ N6 j2 y4 [( z( I. b4 ]
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，  A) C! c) ~" C4 a; R& S  m
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，  l" b- v9 @* N5 E% z, M' I
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，4 b; c3 h7 {+ |$ _3 C* W& j
M 都可算壞了。9 t: ?1 o0 f# M5 O6 k7 G
8 k3 T! f, G- d. Y% \
F 呢個人仲掂，
  w% Q$ y+ i0 D7 y6 o知道既唔等於要講，
, K# |0 `" Z* d* k8 K如果呢件事發生係自己身上，7 T; h, c' }5 i4 D# v+ y
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。! ~. S$ }+ W% o. Z2 Y
) ?  z- S, n0 M) J
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
( n# O/ O4 j, |/ Z% a2 `始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
/ I) s8 _( d6 v: P) s! t" N* R' v" L
* _8 l8 T5 @( I  X; z" J' ~! J. W7 I+ g

) T1 j" y8 K: v* O% m題外話：
- T3 ]! f! x( D0 \唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，, ~6 P! C" @( c( \1 x. `
睇到 S 呢條友，
4 W4 |# l5 T! l我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L9 T' I' T! G! \" N: ?; f

* Y; _9 v. T; u( a) nS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
% U4 p5 r$ u* c# W- zF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係& j- e5 \2 B9 J6 V4 j
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她% t8 e% x* ~0 ], ^+ u
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害+ r; X1 B5 L& f: N
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...