Rika

由最好排到最壞
+ v: b' h& H0 c2 K5 RF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong1 |' C( z" \- T* L$ E. m* z
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
/ ~1 l* N6 g: Z, z/ i5 NS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her1 D7 p  H  ~# {) L* N6 A1 k; k
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure4 f  K/ u) u; I0 \1 ]' g- ]& ?+ |# l
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:- j/ Q7 b$ K0 Y/ k3 \/ n
( e( v+ ?! M' P( Q$ C9 ^
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人4 Y. D- {2 c: e0 A, D

" A$ s( h+ R- {8 H( `9 j7 A: \/ eS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)" M* Y+ F! {, v
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
- b) V, p: p3 }( ^: F. {" B! Y' R  \' Y' U
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
0 O. X8 f$ @* y. o9 F( Q
: l2 H& j7 N6 m+ H# P$ i) `) JL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
  S* q9 n6 Y) y  `
( b) V7 T: u  M( `$ e$ DF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,8 e+ P, q$ v& |- o
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好& g9 x7 n0 X* f) G
( ^7 Q5 ^8 M, a* i4 D
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案8 A& A7 A5 C! G& Z. V: ^
而家答多次- u# K5 G8 [4 m1 v+ C! K* O* m
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
& V" a5 @5 r  t0 b8 X2 U9 C# gl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
4 a/ i' e9 N. a9 ~$ w7 ob: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢1 `- i( Q4 X. Z/ }
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.1 D5 J. V; ], |4 ]; [1 A! Y
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S1 R! [! |0 }9 ~- F
+ b( ~0 u, V) V/ f& G7 V1 J1 a( S
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
$ A; A' ^# r$ j7 p* JF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
- L5 A# O' i7 g4 L& ~- RM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒' ^+ h% P# q" r. S8 P" [( ?5 W
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
' M+ W$ }* Q5 w1 X$ SB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
8 X6 J! I+ K9 S  p7 t1 zF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"- E; c* |. F# X' z' m
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取" q+ H' ~* N1 n5 e2 k
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
/ f  r1 r- x9 z9 B* L. NL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
+ [0 m/ g1 d1 G+ _; f- t7 @B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情! a1 t/ f# N6 O; f( a9 t
8 I- i8 ~* o0 e* o3 K2 R. ~
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:+ h+ D+ \  [- q5 U6 U5 L
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
% C# m0 U" I  MB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘  S1 S8 R) _& o9 J% h" z! F4 ?
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件2 T, k8 A0 h- ?0 _# a$ m
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方3 [5 d3 A% f! u' j/ L
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

! ^0 k0 b5 m) S( [

9 D/ T+ c* y$ E! W same choices with u , but want to add some comments
) i9 l/ E# A$ N, J6 T0 v, n: N9 b; ], b5 Z
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
2 m' `8 z2 ^& |) ~) x1 Z
& ^' b# s6 B  \' z0 yS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
. I  x/ {2 b# T  s$ }+ ~, F$ g6 q& l* w1 m" s
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
( }3 W$ M. m# r2 K8 z) k, |
: v! W; F+ J' v: a  GM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
$ h4 J3 m: T1 P/ C: |3 p; `7 t' P) s' L5 D
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
7 |. B- L% ]  z2 yM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
7 C! j; T* N+ LL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點  j# ^2 A# D) l& A+ X- ~3 T3 y
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma5 x1 t" V9 Q4 r/ s0 k9 y( l1 L

5 |$ E4 J5 Y& R% ?$ |* P最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
- V1 T/ h$ \% c8 e# {有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，: T1 e) f0 d# U5 Z8 @
由最好開始排起既話，# `. ?; e. L+ x1 ]5 u" g
L B M F S 啦，
4 p2 v) ?& x& |2 E. X' {2 Y4 m6 ~
: v# W! d" l2 f( k. ]* D. _8 H& T其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，+ f, S$ L7 `% [  U% U+ ?  ~
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？! w5 U$ i7 q: {% W1 V: E
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
& F- H+ k% k- ]: |% L又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
' {, w/ ~- c6 r$ K8 t0 Y
% }. U+ K5 F& ~* E: U! `# r而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
' I' m, C( o1 k; c# u所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
3 o6 a& J! g2 v$ w明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
; g6 k1 }7 g9 I. P$ m
' R/ H, ]3 C. `  Q' P- P: s2 J而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，3 O! A; c5 S& r
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，- h( i% m- I- |3 [+ P/ I& s
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
& J$ i, q- I& i) C4 w+ @, b$ Y知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，5 @  o( [+ G7 L* }# ^
M 都可算壞了。! [' f4 C9 n) I, A  X1 [: O
" I: k4 C6 X) Q2 H3 x& M+ Z  x
F 呢個人仲掂，
; ~. w% A4 ^2 O* g8 `知道既唔等於要講，! w* A( @6 g0 y& i8 W4 E
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
* W( S" V, O3 e6 c我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
) \/ Y- i; A- ]$ h/ I4 X( a5 j3 j& ^3 b; f7 p
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
, _$ K1 `: B( o! o始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。' Z) H: k* |9 H  ^+ O- a
5 I6 p1 a1 X! J' V# S
+ r9 V8 C, o. ?8 G& a

- M1 M! v" f- L( U$ O! a題外話：& G( k+ P5 w/ a, }2 s
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，# t* i7 W3 @5 r1 D& {, ~
睇到 S 呢條友，
4 [# T8 g. S$ o/ \, h% B; v我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L/ P% {9 T! @9 s. ]$ Q
8 ?+ \6 m% ]* M& u1 |
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
: V" L( |5 e6 n8 R' cF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係# B) A5 O  i# P
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她" D# b  v* U) C5 {
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害8 `! `7 }3 C8 u# _1 P, b% p4 i1 d9 ^- `
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...