Rika

由最好排到最壞
( F7 O( [/ Z3 H* E" iF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong- l. A2 D8 K; d: E7 W
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
. K+ l. _- u$ s9 A. rS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her! b$ u, M" b9 h/ U4 j% f: A, ]& c
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
$ x# x7 {' W( M: t0 z, n2 T' z# `L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
) X$ k& M4 ~/ S$ U6 V& [, k$ u( H4 f) K, H+ d
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人. n! P. J( k/ C7 ]- L* |6 B
5 N5 {1 O4 @; D# M
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)7 y# b: W2 T  y0 x# X
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!9 P9 ?5 f$ j2 ~+ h1 m6 {
' j; c  w6 U% u- X) f+ W' ~
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
' d7 ^- w5 f% F( `- f
, o$ G+ t4 Y, Y1 WL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志0 ?6 A' L# Z4 O4 k( P

9 h' F$ l# I. p/ }4 uF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
2 ~. _/ H' M. Z+ E     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好3 a% F( {; n9 u+ M; `) O

: J; j& ~1 k- k) i[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案5 c' g- _4 Y4 g; _! m
而家答多次
+ N" |. ?& y, z4 df: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽! S+ R- K4 s9 q9 h- w
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架0 C  V8 J' d6 x
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
$ L6 w5 r+ ?, A9 p# Ss: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
7 s0 s+ T4 U4 X8 A/ _) ]m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S, c) K: N# u6 t

3 u) c; N0 I0 P: Y; {L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大5 O5 e/ o4 }' P; M7 Z
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
3 K, i4 t  Y% M" D0 L& H# N* hM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
8 G* q# W3 T0 X5 IS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢7 W) K: g0 t0 k) n; `1 F
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞. [& z! }% B  b  f, U
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默". w" H! d/ z2 c$ e8 }2 U7 \% k9 c
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
$ a# n) u; p  s' U. aM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法: K6 C* r% V  T8 `) `
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果2 m0 z9 k. {1 I; d9 F" a( s
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情0 ?- O1 V- J, j2 S, r
1 p( ]  q$ D5 {7 }
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:( U3 Q0 x9 @0 }) l( m* H2 F/ A
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
- A3 e0 a( C* U" G& ^6 j- pB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
- ?, s6 B, O5 I, c3 v) AS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件+ m# t6 u! t9 B2 w! S
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方' x2 |. E" e4 U; r
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

2 ~9 f+ e# a, E1 Y) \3 s& v4 Q: D) F& b- I+ Q) V
same choices with u , but want to add some comments % ^0 g, N4 g4 N7 {9 \; ^
. {4 f9 G4 E! m& P  C) p! a& V1 b
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  : U) f' n2 ]3 r$ @( ]* T$ E
. Z# _* E+ \+ N
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
4 c, s3 O% p; v) W0 Z- l0 v8 j8 G3 x6 y3 f9 E/ }, @
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome # v# U2 n, a6 p: A8 e

9 Y+ \0 f9 d+ m& z( mM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
; d6 y& e4 ^) J( W( {
# i7 R4 w) q7 d[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
/ w* m1 [/ U5 S/ l. A( UM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢7 [- D" L# k7 {. l$ e  I
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
' D; O  L; k6 J- i& gF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
; J' N) I, c, a8 U8 L# z. O- {' n0 w& v. t+ h8 _+ j* o# ]
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....( p# l5 r( b4 d) I, y& `6 L2 p4 X
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
# u4 s' t" |# ?2 v由最好開始排起既話，
* q* L% J" e6 o& E: j. U! kL B M F S 啦，
5 m  c5 I3 ^% ]
6 V* s9 I& F+ Q. {; \" N7 k0 b0 J其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
- G  L1 Q! k: |! n% u2 K但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
1 i. n5 ?1 z% A* I如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
4 h" I( K: W  k( Q又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
2 B0 ]$ n( W5 U9 [8 m
2 z. ^9 R  r  k1 |而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
  x; N) u1 e5 ?8 M, g% D& x所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，$ h8 m. W% `  c: A. @
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
) U6 h4 G+ A# W' B
! D$ l8 ]& v+ o! b4 F* U, I8 }而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
! n+ Q9 h/ A* B2 \! r2 |- l M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
- z0 i+ r# s% H. S0 o2 j( Z/ G亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，" w( f( h6 G- E4 x$ l% m) b! G4 M
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
7 P. d/ v6 p; {2 q M 都可算壞了。
# C- _5 v& g5 C" {2 L: `- Q0 j. N( d( a0 T+ _5 n
F 呢個人仲掂，6 v7 T4 ~4 r# Z2 D
知道既唔等於要講，
& Y; j& o1 a! [2 K8 ?/ z如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
; ]  G1 X* j( F* A% ?) Z; _1 ~' |: c我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。2 a5 w: X+ ^4 B7 a5 H/ E

; c- M% E, O- o' E$ W最衰個個緊係 S 啦，, K$ [2 k% s+ }
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
, J. P- }. i0 A7 c
3 [+ g4 ~" e. w6 F4 e: P/ {1 J5 P5 ^7 J) }

  l8 R; l' h* ^5 _題外話：' S/ S" C/ r* a% q4 j2 r* X
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
* z9 w3 k# e* \. K睇到 S 呢條友，
8 x6 v  O- D- t: A  E+ Y我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L+ X8 \' j+ c/ i( k

9 M% C; I5 ~5 X/ u  y3 B; WS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
  R: D9 M" k: F4 @F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
# O. Y! V- j9 wM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
( `. ~4 D3 A+ o: {$ J2 nB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
0 X3 M. {3 I, Z1 K- [3 S* ]) J9 g( {L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...