Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
8 s$ Z+ |8 V, M1 M$ z$ [8 \
: N' E% H; z( B0 F5 y: i' c3 L+ F
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

& T. H6 a- o5 x: q

, r) q  b( U  y8 X# H4 g) TIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:5 v( L1 E; w4 ?0 K- J4 ]
  }+ t# o7 b$ W2 W4 l1 k- i! M! \1 S: I+ A
% I* G0 h3 ?0 b9 q' j
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

% @: G$ v* Y  r! V; [; N8 {

$ T6 N+ k: R1 [) [oh really...
, g1 _" k- p6 B- N* C: L: Ehahhaa, thx a lot^^"6 L; s' m% M5 }4 t1 V
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
- B5 @, r. i0 H$ x2 o6 k2 e; I- w
當然這是個假設性問題
4 J6 _, s* @0 w: r7 H/ u但將人數倍大8 p) a. e: z" y4 \# r! K+ ?2 e
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
2 g! l% c1 a& M2 y9 k! o(情況可以換作其他)
( h3 T  v7 q: m始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
" U& z; k8 u1 U" |如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...$ i* G- P8 G( T& d  F
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
* v5 Y# q1 f# D1 m* ^- c! ^絕情谷既問題...
. V# s5 b) L9 A. o如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
. s0 _3 E% W7 X8 J& l2 V如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

$ q+ ^5 O9 K) n- C' X; C* o殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好6 T3 j# z' q- M- T* Z
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生* ]/ t- Q7 Q% j
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
9 f% o0 l$ }1 A" y好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
5 n" J, q7 b  E  V; S% I其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
# {/ I8 @" U5 Z
, g3 k/ ^" H. i6 V  E7 G1 ^我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命6 Y- c, g4 \9 L7 |$ J6 v
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
' E0 A3 a1 K( O. k其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

' v2 W( p; j* t) D+ I  \
. G: l' \, q- |" W. C- F4 g2 x
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
3 I! _: O4 a  g( t# Z: b- h你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
$ {- M7 C( {1 V
: o* f/ a! D% M2 @/ Gp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child/ e+ T! X6 o- f2 ^/ ^0 `
yes, my reason is helping more' p1 s: _0 m2 w" F. Q' J9 C2 a
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
  a, o; l/ r/ S/ E; jif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child% n& w/ v! [1 j/ `' S0 c
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?/ v, R, W- [- A9 v/ e: }; m8 Q
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
# F- h4 {, U8 e( F7 b2 _7 umay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!# y7 `# N. p; n( d2 e: D4 d
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~# g1 Z* f4 Q) ^
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~: g6 @: f1 n) c0 E: y7 B; t1 X! J
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~( Q0 [' ~9 m# I
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~/ F6 q: ?' ?- u8 }
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~1 Q3 A  D7 d6 f! p6 o1 X3 u9 r
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~  v# \% Z" G0 m2 B; H3 O
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~3 x7 G  J2 [& [
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）