vivienna

Originally posted by 28083003 at 2005-6-18 01:07 AM:
" a/ K5 n& l9 B% ?1 N6 X- r2 N反轉黎諗1 C7 ~1 u. e3 p- C) G8 o  K# _
ps2之所以o係香港咁流行就因為有翻版6 P9 |$ A& U* M; ^/ m
你睇下DC,X-box
0 Z0 Z" y- H' e) H0 ~- O同ps2 o既機o既銷售量真係無得比  _# B" X2 g3 y) V! `
你估ps2無老翻會唔會有咁多人買呢??

5 b" X7 P: k% ^2 Y7 l
講中曬!!!
8 P  h8 ]$ w3 B8 O& Z* _/ {4 u# v! S6 F% X8 V% H
仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。) x: `5 {8 O" X

0 s6 \" m2 w) ?* }  t講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

bodycharge

物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行改車先算犯法.  同樣道理, 改機, 無錯, intension係要玩老番(但係仲未玩喎), 但係就算依家連買老番都算犯法的話, 政府大不了只可捉用改機來玩老番(如果真的立了法). 改機呢個行為, 又點可以算犯法呢?  明唔明呢??

vivienna

Originally posted by bodycharge at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
# |) ?2 X' Y9 B) f0 u物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行...

6 T. {3 @5 G5 Z( j4 po甘政府當初立法嚴禁運毒咪立錯左囉﹖話曬都未販賣﹖又未用﹖
& U: Y( z( f; \4 F) ^% l% w! L& ~/ p: k2 h
要斷米路﹐政府就係要甘絕﹐條條路都要封斷曬。

bodycharge

哩個例子, 即係: 毒品=老番.  針筒=PS機.  政府唔可以禁針筒喎.  如果係咁, 全區碼DVD機都唔可以賣啦.

細驚

針筒應該係等同改左機既ps2
& W- B* ]; f/ D" ?5 u5 v* h7 O8 {. [% P8 Y8 U
其實政府今次立法原意係岩* t+ @5 W, \" E3 a9 ?
但正如bodycharge兄咁講, 改左機, 但未玩翻版, 唔算有損版權) s# x- Y2 N, }0 M# u
唔可以用販毒唻比喻 而且部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管
$ f  y" b7 P( a( a5 f7 B* C* F4 }. r/ U9 t; k5 \' |% W. u
另外, 政府咁搞係好心做壞事
) e. ?( z3 J1 c% a- h- Z- d一個唔該令sony賺少左硬件既錢9 |& U7 i/ ?+ o% z) f; \& b
眾所周知
& V& }& Q" d" [ps2咁好賣, 同之前ps, gb, gba一樣原因 有翻版
- `+ F! {9 M$ o& }( i0 d佢假如真係立法成功 相信唔會再有咩人買ps2
/ r" ~5 p" X" K+ X' A到時希望真係正版軟件可以支持到佢地香港分公司既運作

abc123aa

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
; B- m- X; t  R8 [( E
7 @& Y# f9 s5 A3 z$ l8 d* P講中曬!!!
) {: k/ F; ?* c6 z/ D
. k3 o# ~, G3 R/ o仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。
! O6 m) q  [, [, V9 f# z1 C( \3 I& J* B8 ?) q, b; d% m
講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

! q! e  I& E9 h! n5 X6 \對~我得好少 game,因為冇咩錢,但係我唔會買翻版,因為都唔知玩唔玩整既,加上正版game畫面都靚d啦~
% `& W7 d  H, ^" t8 b
% ?9 j) p7 W' O7 V$ vps2要睇vcd果d野買多一條唔知咩線就得

waterfire

唔係翻版, 點會有咁多人買...
2 W) ]! p) z8 S! D其實最簡單一樣野. ?% Q+ X9 N( Q- G" d
正版好似翻版咁平
& ~( y% _* H9 L3 o或者, 香港人個個好有錢, 買正版game 好似食餐飯咁
7 A9 Z" i. _; u2 Y/ i咁就可以解決問題la

sheraton

I think PS2 piracy should not be an immediate concern to HK Gov't, who cares when we're only stealing, pirating, copying Japanese/American developed products?  Japanese "adapted" many Chinese culture and called it their own, who's going to pay us back for that?
" G5 {5 a0 D4 }6 l+ o- v" F# ?/ c1 W* J  |# ?# ~
But I agree, Copyrights should be supported if it's on HK developed products like Movies and Music.  Coz HK, we should care, I could care less about Japan

bigg

我覺得唔可以apply毒品呢個例子
5 X5 c3 O5 X3 I9 d# r7 `- f因為你本身藏有大量毒品已經犯法, 咁你運毒就一定犯法啦," d, y7 w) U; i, y$ h( F! }7 ]
但ps2本身係合法既, 咁我買左番黎點改係我既事, 唔通我將部ps2放落屎坑都話我犯法) i7 A7 p4 j6 ~$ a9 L4 f" S
我覺得政府應該係立例加重賣老翻既刑罰, 等佢地覺得冇錢賺就唔會賣/ ]& g+ \: J8 [2 S
再講而家d人都用bt download game落ps2玩, 立呢條例都冇咩用

Miz

我就覺得係關..
- r! C: O: c. B, L/ p) L& _% m改機既用途
+ w: J7 W) t& Q0 r; l; \/ \% v$ A如果改機既用途一定係用黎玩老番 so先要改既咁就可能會犯法囉3 J0 d7 J& I8 X6 j: g6 }3 ]& b
政府咁做都係想阻止d人玩老番啫(其實邊阻到架)...冇做錯架~
% Q( c: M- T- Q# c/ y$ w; H我亦同意樓上話..『部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管』