<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)' J- `# ]' |0 o1 T, n8 y! D& q
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:5 g% I& Y8 R' e8 f- I5 L; S. c; ?8 D
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
! }( y0 t( ?3 t0 EI agree you points that it could be illegal
% j7 E# o+ r& D( bbut that is still a "gray area"
6 l; b. F; R$ [3 d3 K6 \/ P0 mwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair3 c/ X' g9 q1 A& ?9 x# v: o3 M+ S; L
" A3 m; K8 R8 N2 B
anyway, I want to say that is9 v& H$ D, b$ F5 U) f. R& v  z
who is supposed to be protected by laws
5 J7 n) v1 C- T, z* g! l2 v& _( e. Tcreators?
; {6 K7 b8 S' {. l1 ebut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market( P$ b; g1 q" ?0 U# _& i
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
; Q! g- b) D7 o# b% O; qwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
, w% O, L5 z8 P7 V( rWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:1 E- H1 O9 U; J  C4 Y0 m9 w. v
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
3 M; P9 |. Z. n) O. ~我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
) \' ~6 H+ B5 Z. m2 R' {
, _; D& d: s" v/ v/ h: W" [我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
/ E4 Q0 c4 z: l' t& G唔係喎!
5 S7 s% D) V" Z' m古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
) x! c. H6 S: ~0 ?% r1 l$ t9 {我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
- j7 z; \, z. k# ^) _4 s) f佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
% r+ g+ U5 W; R) z$ b就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事3 y/ t2 J, o0 f
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
% w% q, n0 I' n5 S8 tdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face......." P* B* f- o6 w- }0 C0 a
if so bad, dun download la, right?  P, \# H( M4 T
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^  ?1 |9 A- z! ^) j- h$ T2 _
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct+ A# d5 i) p3 r
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la' G1 i& q+ y0 B8 x6 c
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society! W2 w% P+ ]! _: i4 U+ ^
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........* }0 f& f, U' b$ D1 g( u
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!  ~$ Y. G) h# H3 D& B- _9 w+ r
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
4 d5 p  X8 ]2 T" Q- N6 m佢又唔係殺人放火~~~7 ^8 |6 G* ~4 o- W6 Y
政府想比下馬威0的人~~* y- M( _& b" q. P% l
錢就一定罰2 e  B7 w0 A  r) W
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,5 T/ E3 b! T. w% _$ C
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?8 d  }1 t% J( w8 s
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
6 V$ G. P: a& l+ p2 u到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。