<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)* x* P. d) k' p1 s; }4 w
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:5 [* @$ m) b5 c8 D4 C+ D9 I3 x
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
5 \7 Q" s. Y& Q  K# k
I agree you points that it could be illegal
& Y: W& D  h% L8 Q7 ?( h3 Ibut that is still a "gray area"
9 m0 v6 b! M7 U) w& R! dwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
1 B: R! N+ y+ r# c/ h: ^5 t- _/ a$ s! J* B' a/ j
anyway, I want to say that is3 C" C2 a) Q7 i5 c. P
who is supposed to be protected by laws3 @4 M6 c3 M  T1 G. z
creators?
3 Q0 x/ u6 z& f: Obut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market0 @2 r# t" q* u" }: x( x* j3 s
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.# g0 N% f- ~$ a+ g1 f, G& s2 ?8 V
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those; \" o0 B3 O0 Y# N7 w% E- i
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
. l# H; w) T7 C& z: F1 F3 B- c9 U, X) q其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
; |! f' \4 [. w我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:" X& G$ J# h# Q
9 k+ h* ^  S" ]9 p! V0 E5 ^0 v$ x
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
7 ~* Z% z& u& I唔係喎!
  E! I6 m4 E* _& o古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!! O- n* S* \# |5 ^# k
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
0 ~1 z% E1 S( I0 `+ y/ N6 A佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
$ o; a: D* I! @& a& w, i' }7 X* Q就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
  g* w. H, \" v% ]3 ^8 Z" M2 V1 p一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!& z* N0 e6 P1 ]/ N5 Z
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face......./ e' a7 q- h- Y) O: J
if so bad, dun download la, right?8 H* |' U$ l7 X( Z
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
$ ?5 n( @" ^7 k+ ]but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
7 O. I! h! O& J+ K2 C9 g9 c' nno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
+ y) E" g" P: P2 q9 ]% zso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society* G; @) O; i* @
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........9 U# _5 V0 e$ H9 g
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!7 M+ v4 z6 p9 s5 e3 M2 R
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!& W) \  J5 l  I! ~( X$ k
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~7 Z0 v; [+ v/ W0 d" M6 J1 G
政府想比下馬威0的人~~/ D' d2 ]! E8 m: C% `: ]
錢就一定罰
% d& w9 g, |9 l- }未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,4 W( X3 \1 U# p5 S( Y/ n  M/ c4 C
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
7 T% r" I) U5 ~  K佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
# H, }0 D7 a: N到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。