<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
. |% A- v( U# ]; |5 @/ G但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:3 z& v8 [; k7 {( [  e! R
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
5 z. x. T% L9 o% l* k# z  n  |- B7 s4 l
I agree you points that it could be illegal7 x- b) P+ S6 Y( w) Q, w# X( B
but that is still a "gray area") `+ [- H, v" V  n7 \  E, n
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair- X" t3 `; U7 g& e: |7 L, X0 w
7 P9 Y: a* W, B6 `  A- z  M2 u+ T- G
anyway, I want to say that is
0 R  t* {* S9 @6 p" ^) [( ~& Rwho is supposed to be protected by laws0 `/ I- }$ M2 V2 U4 v* x/ s' \; m/ Y7 H
creators?
: X5 S3 B) h9 K1 V" obut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market' h5 q5 W% _( c6 |% D0 R0 Q2 M
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.1 A: o' ]' \7 K9 c6 I. J
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those% Q+ k% M9 Q8 N$ b+ c
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
+ [5 b3 L  m6 m5 Z7 f( @( _* P其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
& B/ {- [" `2 [) b. c
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:/ Y# C; n  x* ^

- ~; x0 ^$ k2 d' P3 x我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
' a+ d: R3 t+ z( A; S' V
唔係喎!
! c5 q# [$ {) d" z" `5 e古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!1 t: }" v' @" A- {( R& e
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
- ~% x- c( l, f! M( F" }/ s2 G1 W佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!/ Q" h, Z! ~8 q9 \' ]1 n  C0 i
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事' ?6 w# R" S+ S5 j. c' e
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!) D# ^1 K6 [: K- j: X3 o$ x2 E% z
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
3 }4 t! R+ \4 c3 |if so bad, dun download la, right?
$ D. A/ E* d$ k; ?i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
9 p' B0 r5 f# H7 kbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
* x8 N8 r4 R3 _# X$ _' E7 Qno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
! K2 N  q! Z: lso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
* s( ]* M" T8 Z3 N% `7 Fusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........5 J1 S+ R/ B8 k3 @# X5 P" {
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
1 D- z) E6 P9 Zso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!- A, C) {6 k: e$ u
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
$ p( z1 e0 W& S, i$ o政府想比下馬威0的人~~
5 X' u9 N) ]3 G& B, O錢就一定罰& R6 S3 t3 M& z: `; u) t/ K4 ^7 R
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,0 Y8 O$ {9 J" E$ F
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?2 A+ V  V- p6 G, g; G3 w- {
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
, @. O' j( W; p# l# @到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。