<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
( s: C# F7 u' r( G, k但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:2 c' q. e( ?; R3 @
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
( A) b  K5 Q! k$ yI agree you points that it could be illegal, R1 N; s6 s0 O- Q+ K: ~
but that is still a "gray area"
3 `, y. C  Q) S! q2 X/ rwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
# u# g+ ~1 q. X8 n$ h% K' \4 ?& C- i6 E* j( ]) W* Y
anyway, I want to say that is4 t; T# Y1 o5 j0 C& `1 j
who is supposed to be protected by laws! Y9 ]1 P% d2 A- m! U" S
creators?
; F4 e2 n9 ]6 a* g# v/ Y3 n$ gbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
/ q9 O1 x. x; o1 p9 \4 wlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
% H, q1 ]4 C, X3 P' b& O  fwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those# ]; |' a$ j6 p# h7 L
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
/ V/ O0 Q& C* F" _其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
  N* W- o7 N; o: `1 r
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:3 y; f/ r% Z$ X
3 v2 `2 K3 x% J$ Q3 J: g4 }
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
3 p5 L  ^1 |' B0 g3 v" V5 I唔係喎!
* l+ @/ {( {% c古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
2 g: V5 c  K; n/ _. O7 y我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!$ ]. D1 q8 h2 o) O: }
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
( b- y: J& n1 v8 y9 D8 \就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事/ E1 _5 q+ k9 P. t
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
8 F% R% y( }7 A2 n" G# Mdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
1 ?0 N/ T: i3 H, Y3 ~+ ^% \! Tif so bad, dun download la, right?
$ P/ B& L, o4 C+ J  G& Ji am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
' J# C7 T0 q' i+ g& h( \" bbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
2 t4 b0 h- f$ K- |* K) wno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
  A/ S0 W# S7 O. B2 bso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
8 m( H4 Q3 C" m# H+ husing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........9 K" [- V1 v' H: ?5 z3 s
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!; r7 m  A  T. m& r
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!4 M. k5 W2 f: i- ~+ L9 S! Y
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
# l8 G! J. O  t* a政府想比下馬威0的人~~
6 f$ I; W) \* U$ b2 x錢就一定罰3 t' `; D% G9 A' P( z
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,; e1 s8 s9 `4 p( H! s$ c
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
5 G; S$ r' ~5 n/ ^4 `' J佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?! J1 L, y3 ?5 b( ?$ b" G" V
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。