<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大); H2 t: F( G  }' Q6 F& c
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
* q3 \2 a+ X$ x7 v; l. j& H) f大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
3 b) G/ B, D% q) A) Z0 dI agree you points that it could be illegal! w+ N& c8 Q7 N& w
but that is still a "gray area", r( N  N: X" ^: v1 Q5 l
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair$ }& }( z) y5 h/ G0 F+ }- f  s' r+ u
$ q' T/ w- w1 j6 V$ G7 j4 E' P$ A
anyway, I want to say that is
* x; C  Z4 F2 w2 zwho is supposed to be protected by laws0 V9 R4 E9 ~& c4 v
creators?
" k  B$ T* y7 b) a; _  X2 w9 qbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market9 I6 c5 d# `+ n) _+ V1 B
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
, K% ^; W# f/ W3 `/ M# Rwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
  w' y! z3 ~. l% jWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:1 [* `$ ]( o* u) X
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
# N' n0 l- i# G8 S7 O' f  F我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
. k* w* V) p" a2 I6 x1 d
: f# D( g6 ]( D/ B" p! H0 f# l* r& J我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
) O% B. R. T* v' h* V. R唔係喎!
4 N- z" E8 G8 h$ j) K古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
( L# b; B. a  u4 o! ]我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!% S4 K0 t6 O! _7 B& k
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!$ \1 u, y7 C* z* ]  D/ c. y- h. C9 [
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事7 \0 H0 T/ C( P+ s& F, B. b
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
+ }# \! P# R4 O" C  j+ {dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face......., M& Z/ [: B: h( v
if so bad, dun download la, right?! F; U9 N5 f8 e) K
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^1 I1 z2 p; Q) o8 V7 M! Z
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
: X- o8 {& z0 I. H- u7 }) ino need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
# V. i! `* F5 M, [# J* H' bso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society- J" X" @! X; z1 h! {
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
& ~" |, M; c9 s  ~5 `! \why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!4 R7 O9 y3 v8 P/ v( @6 |$ n% K8 z
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
4 Y; ^  N4 {  s, L% n2 W佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
$ S4 O! Z2 n. L# u1 r政府想比下馬威0的人~~
3 D5 |% a! T$ @. m' N7 b8 n: q) j錢就一定罰
) R9 T2 V8 s* J) \未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
: s% x8 ^$ M9 t3 _唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?9 c, @6 [$ R" Y5 V
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?1 q* ^  q  N4 u! _0 O
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。