<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)! u/ e4 H0 _. K7 @8 m
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:: B6 I7 B0 Y; i/ l- u/ A
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
2 V, Q3 w4 D/ X- r0 A
I agree you points that it could be illegal% \# y( q4 B) h1 S/ t  v
but that is still a "gray area"
: f- V" m7 ]0 @: T0 |" Uwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
0 i  F2 N. e$ i% r! g/ n1 V# Q  [  g2 {. Q
anyway, I want to say that is
9 H! r0 t4 X. X* g. V+ [, H7 L8 Vwho is supposed to be protected by laws4 p# \0 E0 g% C8 d5 q
creators?
" W: o7 G: M  m, g+ i2 r& `7 i5 Ebut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market& E7 N' u0 _5 V0 Q& |" D, C4 i( s
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.1 d) E" H  t3 G" X
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
6 |6 T+ Z: O) @& e+ vWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
7 i+ B! U3 r# |9 L5 D* x, X其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
" f" t# p3 c2 l. P3 R我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
9 Z$ Z. L- H2 [# C2 M- t3 {4 T6 ~' c
5 l8 G9 b3 r0 i6 G我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
* f' Q  n* ~- M% G/ `
唔係喎!
% Y/ L6 Z+ l) {! C7 m古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!7 w  W7 o# e4 i% h% G
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
. t$ V: q  }- }/ j* |4 r6 k佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!0 J+ ~# I4 [3 i' I" x3 O: S$ j
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
+ g9 L6 n7 V+ ~7 G) Z$ A/ a1 Q一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!5 m6 c$ @9 U& G* v4 e9 ~# W
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
6 P+ g$ u  H) [% t. \if so bad, dun download la, right?
9 P: N" d' k0 Ei am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
# P0 Q) ]3 K9 q0 o1 n, v7 Q' fbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct3 ^0 U  W( K1 ~% W
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la( u5 g) z7 _" [9 n
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
0 `2 D3 ~# i& h9 n6 busing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
! O( z& F) }. g, U  vwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!# k( h) S* I# Z' Q( q
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
8 z6 u! x0 t: r3 p# O3 h佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
/ q# n6 I' T( r: c政府想比下馬威0的人~~
' T3 ]! f! _! N: d- g$ M0 m錢就一定罰$ U: X8 L( o# [
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,7 L7 X, `  @, \4 o
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?4 v: Z; z$ G( K  h1 Z
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?' v( a, g- w( Y, M9 X3 x
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。