<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
4 ]" h% O5 B( C- J: a% d+ ^) o  J5 Z但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:; D: n: h+ n8 A  n+ @) f
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
7 z% y# ~+ A$ c& R
I agree you points that it could be illegal9 n/ @0 b9 f) j
but that is still a "gray area"
8 @/ x" ]7 Y3 ~4 F6 X  E! {whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair. b& K5 F7 O3 f4 |  C9 m$ {( z# L
8 [$ N6 w& D# G2 o: T! z: W
anyway, I want to say that is! U8 r4 l4 {3 J$ ^! s& Q2 B
who is supposed to be protected by laws
# d6 D' y) L1 e4 i* Icreators?' L, x, g/ \2 P8 k. g0 [
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market. _0 s8 \: ~4 e& e& V( `+ e0 ?+ a
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.2 b6 m2 K  O: f$ o( d
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those, z5 A) n. _9 a
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:! ?) y$ L2 g- _: v9 \1 `+ v
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
( U! r" i) e) U9 t! y( h  O) G我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
8 q% C0 u2 e8 S8 _. K
7 R0 O* s6 `! K+ R  [3 p  J- E我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
$ j% }# [2 k, E- e唔係喎!
* H+ k) V& }4 T+ m7 l, l0 D古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
) W+ t; S- @' \我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!4 @% w0 k1 y9 Y+ _/ c
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!0 g( S' \- Z8 z
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事, r0 Y* h! P' T2 m- A6 s
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!( L; O2 U1 T- N& U+ v
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
2 B' X) U! A) J3 rif so bad, dun download la, right?! g6 K$ _4 A' M4 u
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
5 K8 l" g4 x& A# z/ ]& K7 D. a/ {4 Fbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct2 u+ j4 j; ^4 U6 ^+ Q
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
$ ^  a% U% H* ?9 y2 Y2 J# Z3 u  vso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society: K  @2 K; T& |% k9 X! P% j
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
7 V: y& T* J2 L  J/ ~$ gwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
" V' i+ D% s# s) I! vso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
5 t+ t/ r. e/ K佢又唔係殺人放火~~~; ~8 G! D6 e3 w- H$ h
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
& p4 p) _( d& \& r4 |錢就一定罰' u* D& I& ], U5 R/ g
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,- F  N  I5 e0 K1 O, V. d
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?% o* d2 `7 r1 a  r) [) T
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?: c( V- z+ a# t* ?9 W
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。