<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
; i  F8 n# t. P5 |$ k% b但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:2 j* H; B5 x: P# j/ ^& ?
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
# T) J7 P+ y& d+ s
I agree you points that it could be illegal
) q9 z7 G  W* ?9 @4 bbut that is still a "gray area"
) t  S1 C$ Q1 f1 {whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
. X& K1 j* p4 t" d" p, F# H& y' R8 J0 Q/ h9 L
anyway, I want to say that is- u5 F( M/ q, E3 c1 a7 I8 f
who is supposed to be protected by laws
% R) Q9 C4 P/ q  Y) B8 Ucreators?3 u, t* p" X. h9 G' f5 V3 ~
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
8 \2 G& V; G! X5 k9 ?$ [' Vlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
( ^& ^+ b  ^3 e0 P( G( F% o8 X. |when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those5 p1 O" c4 J$ @( ~1 U
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:7 D' S& ]+ W1 y4 a8 \
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
) [; q; `8 T- D, O6 _& ~我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
6 Y' N, x& ?( b( e8 |$ y8 p7 j# U3 m8 W
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
9 |( }* D: s+ r. M6 f* N, S! h' c
唔係喎!! S6 g, k- B( |5 v4 y
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!7 @. d1 k& u2 Z7 {1 {
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!4 C2 Q* r1 f% Q* e% M" D9 ~1 O4 s7 [
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
6 b- W3 w. ]8 W! P- V就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事- x  y$ A' K; O! s* C2 G$ X! f
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
# R8 q& o# F4 r8 ?/ x& Adun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
# P4 _4 b) b  ~. F  ]if so bad, dun download la, right?# o5 h% l/ P9 k/ y9 w
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^& I7 Y3 ~( S6 _1 w- F, `9 \
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
$ E8 M4 C5 X$ R- P: ]& }no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la0 }! A  d# L& t- D' Y$ d
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
) x$ l/ ]) O+ X. m6 t( p' husing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........! g, }; m2 i+ D. `( T
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!% M. s# i0 B  @' C: v# C# n, s
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!% y# `' i) T% a  Z6 e
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~, Z3 e/ C& I3 N
政府想比下馬威0的人~~) N. j! w& m6 b+ y8 m
錢就一定罰7 D7 o3 r9 h2 A3 `
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
. L7 r" h) A& x( N/ `; i唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
* k" I9 y" R  y佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
. J, v! T* |# J8 }6 E: a6 `) N到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。