<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)5 Y6 K0 A1 W/ K2 W
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
8 K4 c% V& @/ C8 s大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
, e& J; b7 o" `; O$ cI agree you points that it could be illegal
4 e' y0 C# C. Z) y! P: Cbut that is still a "gray area"
) h3 _$ _2 C+ s5 j4 {0 Iwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
- U7 H) l. `6 x; f2 b% v' G+ v. A4 Z1 S! D5 }; i
anyway, I want to say that is
, e# Z; K/ f% Q0 I/ O" |who is supposed to be protected by laws* D+ |2 Z) l0 ]: V& n
creators?
! Y9 S& K) M' e9 e* U2 ], O! @. b" rbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
( C0 G2 D/ n( B& z# N5 slet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
2 I9 V% J& q$ x+ Y6 xwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
1 ]) n) ?4 |) w) Y+ N+ |Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
+ W. ]: c6 l* h$ m) s# h. d其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
4 ^) {" K/ V; C1 h4 Y; t: K
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
3 W8 z3 g$ g+ l4 t0 ]* E# T) Y2 U/ z2 W+ G3 S5 z8 K
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
1 e1 O4 _& Y, q唔係喎!+ J& m8 T7 c) n8 S- Z' G+ U
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
+ j; K$ m! ~7 W0 z7 R& p: d我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
2 M/ E% {/ `# S2 O0 V佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
) L$ D: t+ L. ]7 w, a* l9 X6 l就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
( x" h) K# g) d: r- N3 s1 B. ]5 S# x一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!6 S5 c, `: r. E- ~, }) ]
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......1 G8 s/ l8 w* _
if so bad, dun download la, right?- Q9 `' \: Z6 u$ N! |5 Q
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
; H; C. U) L' T8 @7 ^' x  gbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct; J$ c5 h5 C/ o4 s( ]
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la1 x2 k" S% b' C; }& w9 a0 c
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society0 w. M+ }4 m$ Z& r9 D& ?' S
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........  Q6 V0 p5 [- k% |6 ^
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!4 g( X2 x' T) \* j! ^3 _
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
& g1 @0 ^5 s1 F7 @) g, s佢又唔係殺人放火~~~! k8 A. Y2 A& a/ Z; e
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
3 d; o/ U; \+ S4 A) D* m錢就一定罰
0 J* Y/ e+ ?6 `6 v. c0 F未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,4 t  D6 J4 Z% t9 ^6 _
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?; N% `! [) a, G& \& @' `; b
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
9 X4 b  n1 E: P. z6 M到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。