<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
8 V/ ?/ s5 T7 B& }但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:7 V% Q4 ~, S! L7 r/ H
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
, k/ h6 }( _' v5 T3 jI agree you points that it could be illegal
. g7 S0 U( |+ N" q' v' o! Hbut that is still a "gray area"
' J# K/ o& s5 H4 ~$ rwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
" N4 ?7 `% {9 A' \& G
; N; X7 e6 N2 A& w, Banyway, I want to say that is
9 A# e$ R  {! |% b4 H3 pwho is supposed to be protected by laws4 o6 v1 }. u* A- g4 O1 H$ Y& |
creators?, }' \+ g$ Z4 v: f: z
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
0 ~& Q- \3 A/ U' plet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.1 m$ U# F3 N( Y. x# G* O
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those0 A' r& k+ T; ]) j6 F4 X. C
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:. i0 P5 M2 S8 I! i; B( p
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
1 z3 f/ |7 L" F+ O1 E我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:$ P' o- T( z* u0 x9 ]' C

+ c# o9 i$ R5 e我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
5 g' K8 l8 f: g3 i
唔係喎!+ V' f1 n& t2 l) L
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
; B3 N" L1 D- W+ b+ _  V我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
# R7 W1 q3 V( d! \3 Q佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
3 z: @- X  p& l9 i" J就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
7 O8 E9 D' N# A( v2 |4 J一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!% m$ i/ i% e% H
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......) X& }# A2 l$ k8 s
if so bad, dun download la, right?$ I% b, W/ j) f' S& T
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
/ L* ~& U5 G6 L3 A* ibut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct" ~) o; t; D. c8 d
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la9 s2 Y! U3 S! y& {
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
8 h2 z( B% G; \8 G/ fusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........* i8 X7 u% I! n3 i; M0 @6 u
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
3 P0 s2 T7 z; X4 A" [8 cso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
0 a9 Q8 W* h& |  X/ ^; i佢又唔係殺人放火~~~3 o6 Y9 b7 @: }4 j+ ?8 u5 l
政府想比下馬威0的人~~9 Z! D8 U- a# _; C6 B- g( \
錢就一定罰& a+ {3 `$ o5 ~5 u3 X
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,9 ]8 E* u! b. Q5 }6 l, o+ ]
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?2 i' @4 k( ]: j0 f" W
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?+ r7 H9 N1 T# A9 y1 u
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。