<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
+ f  L5 m5 d2 X& v4 Q% i% r但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:8 @  X8 A2 z' y5 [# P) {5 b8 v
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
' {# \; `/ d+ [! h2 \+ B( B* k5 |I agree you points that it could be illegal
7 p5 R: I& c% Z- ebut that is still a "gray area"" z9 z( Q+ y% F2 n8 ]
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
% f4 h2 c' E2 _9 b
' P' w6 b# Z9 m: a# [, b4 e- manyway, I want to say that is
; s5 T2 U7 J' V4 C% ]  f, ?who is supposed to be protected by laws
+ f. Q% k% U6 X9 v% m# F% t+ zcreators?+ {) Q" Z3 M, _  b
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
; B* F! I/ {) R0 jlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
% Y& [% G2 y7 W3 [9 K$ J1 [6 K6 owhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those5 H  R# {: A" j* m% O
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:  w1 ?5 Z9 i: V+ |! M. d. x  b, q
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
  p! L6 ~; o% |- P* e, m
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
6 D" p" v' P/ D/ W! t1 P) |, j$ U% q. c0 c- s0 x% v
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
# j9 ^. ]/ ]2 G6 l( i唔係喎!
  @; |# C# Y. p3 \- _5 G0 M古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
6 e- i' q1 a4 E0 _我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
1 V, Y$ R- D. T佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
" R% b* i0 o3 y9 R0 ?就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
0 |/ y, ]2 ?( D一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
8 B& H( S; K/ v6 f& g0 r; @dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......% [& }5 a1 Y. M+ [- Z
if so bad, dun download la, right?
5 k1 |3 g% \! ^$ ~' X5 e2 V$ wi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
1 H/ q/ `/ \& ^. Q# W7 t7 P6 x2 k$ wbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct; v' ~/ P# T8 x; S( l# y
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
0 B1 }' M/ \$ |1 kso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society" q6 e: r  [+ _) T: y/ T# S
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
' I, f, _6 x+ F! Uwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!6 G3 L6 ~4 `; B
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!8 O7 X3 t. c7 r9 g% y7 J
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
8 ?' v" T  N2 p& S# D政府想比下馬威0的人~~- S6 z8 {4 M- z7 q6 @
錢就一定罰
( u+ K+ Y; X1 _: \8 F# d/ T- q未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,! X$ D; U3 U+ e; x$ m
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
0 l/ V0 p; c' Z佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
* F/ e) f0 O% h) M# A: A# U到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。