<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)  Z7 Y0 f3 x4 c! w& ?$ ?$ S+ t5 v1 ?
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
% \1 q7 V1 Q0 O2 o. K$ {6 d. M大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
8 Z. Y* l8 b5 N7 q% M9 G! Q
I agree you points that it could be illegal
! F3 q' I! G* s9 l8 [5 N# Wbut that is still a "gray area"$ E6 X2 O1 _- @1 N. A
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
8 ^' a  Z  W5 }
4 a: o0 Z# o- ?7 Aanyway, I want to say that is
& ?+ d% D3 s& a3 c) pwho is supposed to be protected by laws. j7 n4 N7 v) P1 c/ c1 ^5 B/ P
creators?2 }5 E% _+ ]* Z
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market8 H4 _) D! x2 A$ ?
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.( @6 d2 Q1 w- {' R; [
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those6 [2 @) {0 T* d
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
- G& @7 Q9 T4 F其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
  v) R: @& f. _
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
, z8 a3 ^+ p- C0 \( \0 w) w9 b( i7 R. b; |( O
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
$ k- }% X8 ~% _& P5 F) p; y% u
唔係喎!
& {$ a3 |, n4 o0 o# u/ k( n古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
6 ~8 B% U0 i- y/ W8 x我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!! u1 m0 s, U) W& x3 Q8 W3 d
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
& M7 B4 m! w8 W$ Q9 d+ q就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事4 U2 ~8 i3 U. C. K
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
9 n: A- b3 M0 q7 l. d' A: P  Q: Ydun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face......./ P* y! j  L* o9 {9 l5 K, V
if so bad, dun download la, right?
+ w! B) {# r$ h( D( W# zi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^6 b# C+ \+ x4 e( M2 m* t9 g
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct' ~$ t: e$ E: o
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la( b( J0 a% \" v  p$ L7 @; s: V
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
, |3 F9 q( b% L2 Kusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
6 u) l! N3 T  ]6 ]0 l) m  hwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
0 _, Q+ ~4 _. wso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!0 e2 f+ ]& ?4 ^. k' q/ i! u2 }! R
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
& y3 Y/ _( m4 x3 ^, f( |, }政府想比下馬威0的人~~* h! u% {6 B$ ^* @+ d
錢就一定罰
7 V/ k! d) A' _, a& E- \, f未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,4 w  R. O4 n- ^8 T5 r0 n
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?! g8 X. L9 @# [% p* E) q& y
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
( R9 B& j9 Y$ W  {& B到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。