<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
% S* J7 G! V* ?& e, Z但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:. c( c* h+ y  J: Y' i
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
4 J/ |& g( l! P  jI agree you points that it could be illegal2 n3 T3 ~2 ?+ S. Y. ]& {- s
but that is still a "gray area"
5 r. m+ u9 f" z: Pwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair7 i6 S6 c; V+ C) h

0 i, s# G+ l4 Ranyway, I want to say that is, ?3 K3 w% _  L8 Z
who is supposed to be protected by laws4 g2 V. d# I* @2 M; T, v$ \
creators?9 O- x8 k) d! O; ^* Q
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
: H+ o$ E8 J! j- Y$ q( Slet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
- u$ f$ d+ f6 s/ I4 p* L7 d) hwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those' z4 m0 @6 X0 Q6 Z+ U( g
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:3 Q+ I9 Z4 `/ w& W4 v9 @3 }
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
: n. W& ], w3 D" B1 l- e: ]1 G& T# v2 z% S
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:3 T+ u( p' ?+ N0 f6 ?: A) l+ @
  F6 u1 c+ ^0 f- S1 p& M3 l
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
( Z3 Q& E+ l. m唔係喎!
) t( X7 {4 v% j1 f% c, u古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
) v! T7 Q) h7 |9 e! b我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!: c+ s- e' ^, Z6 t
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!3 R6 l* M7 L0 w5 J3 X3 X9 O5 E1 C4 i
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事% g/ c2 f% d" z  c( d! a" Z* P
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!& ^( E( E9 M6 C/ J9 h+ V3 X/ G
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
; p( O: ~" n# H- d! _1 xif so bad, dun download la, right?
1 [5 ]& y2 d6 \# t9 p( [$ pi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
9 a) ^. L! j: {1 \. ybut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct6 b$ x$ u1 C5 D. g9 m, Y. o
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la  C- P8 d9 C& \  e0 S8 e
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
/ `- O" N$ D, o% t" s' A$ j7 G# I; ausing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........) p, {* `! I" N1 D) D: s2 B2 n% f
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
; C: A. s6 j+ t( Sso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!  @$ q# g4 K* h
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~; U" K0 v  l* t9 x8 y3 T5 V% U
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
" J( q1 R9 |; \0 p錢就一定罰  I, J0 j; `' ^; c. }  I
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,0 c3 ]" b+ N) o$ f; w" Q
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
+ U% ~7 v; m3 l- b佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?6 U5 f( s/ h- H* s$ k
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。