<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)# e2 j5 L9 {/ T
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:. ?9 \) Y$ e3 _8 x! N
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
6 P8 M0 d2 P+ D' i4 MI agree you points that it could be illegal
; o/ _  }6 S7 T" z9 abut that is still a "gray area"1 C) ]4 d& f  e, c) L' z; d. b/ \$ L) v
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair9 B! P- a6 g# v! E+ \% g+ I* W
- i0 b% y  d0 f/ j7 L
anyway, I want to say that is
+ W9 p0 w3 H; h7 |  [9 Cwho is supposed to be protected by laws: Z; J; d& V6 d- Q9 r/ i2 e1 W( }
creators?
0 V3 z6 f) _3 Y( ~6 `* ]; obut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market3 L! \0 D1 H1 i, J) I
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.- L% \( x- I8 M0 Y8 O; G7 G
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those. F& E8 p$ u' ?3 h9 X
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:, q1 |& J& m% }; u0 x3 q
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
8 @0 G; I5 z4 c, j2 r1 e
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:7 S, ~$ }1 e% X. Q- i, H

3 f' q& S) _4 s9 Q我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
! y- N9 v3 ]. d1 Y
唔係喎!( t, ?& y6 J; J( s3 j
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
7 F7 r$ l. b9 S. k我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
' c+ t& b  {. |0 S: f+ p佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
) ~4 i0 R6 o8 h" i: t! |3 B就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
- X( U8 p# I3 m0 l3 m* g6 w一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!* @$ |4 l" W) W- x) ?' K6 m1 \0 P" T
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......7 G2 P& k9 }  p
if so bad, dun download la, right?
0 H1 A! U5 w2 u& \i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^& R& I7 j+ m( m2 A' i
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct9 w, P! s+ u! ?- [4 a
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la2 w/ E% ?5 A, P
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
& f! H' }$ s" Dusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
3 z" Y' u" g! u- ^why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!; c. W& C, e, n: L5 E
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
& p" L; E5 ]! E7 a! T佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
, ]9 E) n* {. a) b0 G/ i政府想比下馬威0的人~~4 \7 e# V" ^8 H" D. j* P+ r- C9 V
錢就一定罰( M+ r1 A% H( V1 O  _% b; }1 q
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,9 k) i& |4 I4 ]! K
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?( w% f" ?4 [$ _. O, d+ N. {
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
  J, Z4 I2 |' n! H$ s到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。