<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)9 a  j; z1 W- H( n& M
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
3 \$ R; p/ U1 }3 J% ^3 @大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
& }% j' o, H# S1 X# y* ]# p) i7 Q! P3 c2 P
I agree you points that it could be illegal$ T0 W% p/ y; o
but that is still a "gray area"
* s9 R& T6 u* G+ ~$ s/ Kwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair( A7 P; [1 o) \7 {( Z5 C0 l
3 V- ^2 |  k: O- b: t, S
anyway, I want to say that is2 a& c3 a: @) |
who is supposed to be protected by laws# t$ q* r7 J) M5 a
creators?# S5 L+ ~2 R/ {  h6 Z3 k
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
7 M) I2 W$ h" \" Q  t2 p* `1 ]let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
3 y! ~: z/ ?6 M, X( Y$ G; S0 Xwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those, ?! A, A5 I* K3 b# A" M& L& v: G8 h* j
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:) N7 a. _2 A5 G" @. ^& C; B# y
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
+ P0 D5 u$ F1 s% [) g我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:- m% S# B- a! M5 I# B) O3 I; O3 w9 l: \  }
, J# \8 Q( e6 m2 P+ x# {
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
+ R4 o+ Z. H; r& ]
唔係喎!- {0 g7 e( Q8 j: c
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!$ ^# x0 |- x% ^* @
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
$ g. k: X+ N3 r3 \佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
/ ?) _7 F/ X3 n+ V5 m; S就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
# x* ]* X1 a7 Y* N1 @- }一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
. }7 p# Z) ?) y! i0 Bdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......' H$ x7 x. ^) h2 o+ V$ Q2 @
if so bad, dun download la, right?7 r, o0 b9 w( N8 _; N5 b
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
3 h5 R  U1 r5 n, A" E$ g& Gbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct1 x0 Y2 V; t- u
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
2 E1 F, K9 Z+ ~7 Jso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
" ^! J' P# n6 @4 ?6 Xusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
! t" w! [$ t8 G6 \0 _why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!4 F# [) ^: I1 P6 x8 E
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!7 r8 h* T) Y3 h- l
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~" f' Z5 R$ T$ O- g
政府想比下馬威0的人~~' i" w, [% @8 ~
錢就一定罰& l) U; l# j4 U1 M" p4 B
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,* ?" n' v# H( j
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?3 G, `/ L' @* I- C3 @! c* n  c
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?6 q2 O4 Y) [( k
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。