<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)0 \* k- k$ J3 j& E% }$ d
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
; {* d& S4 U! f) n& h  s5 D! b大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
/ a8 h( k' A& d- W) k% N
I agree you points that it could be illegal3 K7 m3 p( c) A4 h8 i0 K
but that is still a "gray area"
4 K) \- z4 w+ p/ Ewhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair6 E$ Z+ t' S4 v  X/ \3 t, D

6 S! [$ @" _7 sanyway, I want to say that is
3 {6 |7 H/ N% i* a+ t. swho is supposed to be protected by laws# j* a& I3 ]- @1 G: \5 z- m" w9 D
creators?
6 Q! ^7 m: R6 z2 i7 R7 L+ dbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market6 R" M: B4 [9 ?# W4 q* b- |8 y6 k
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
4 A: [( g2 D% F8 m8 dwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those+ @1 f! S6 e( M- N7 c. ]
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
' w, _4 I" |+ I6 d其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
+ y9 l4 ?; o0 c# M  ^
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:! r. h* K, ?* Y! ~. Y( v4 \2 w

4 k1 V# W9 o2 I( o5 t我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
) G6 Y$ a& }2 f6 l9 i6 S' A1 ?唔係喎!
7 Z1 V& G& [1 J1 g; S+ Q' r) G古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!% O0 }& q4 c2 V2 t: z7 v  i0 O( q
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
1 ]) F- r+ [% k佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
, h* r' u- y( F) B就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
" P1 @, j. X6 t一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!; `. P7 |# V' L; y
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......9 h, B& s1 d: ~( U3 a" r
if so bad, dun download la, right?
3 P! A1 z. z/ R4 t7 N- ]4 d7 Li am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^3 z7 d2 V& j0 b; ~: F
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct5 x3 C1 F% f% z# p" a% w
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
9 w' p/ R% y; X  zso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
. d/ m/ X& ?3 [3 fusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
2 Q% N$ H7 v% Z6 k! pwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
8 D& \) N" _5 L2 g, Yso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!1 r. r* Y" u% u" o1 ?$ \0 w
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
9 @+ O) ^+ v0 A  f3 B政府想比下馬威0的人~~
7 X4 q- F  M; J; O9 F3 X錢就一定罰
- y- J4 D4 t4 `0 X, q未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,- c2 F( F7 _4 X+ U2 F
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
  H: B% v4 ?* y! D, c佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?' d; P+ k( T5 m* B+ }
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。