<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)$ K& M; n9 F5 Q: @9 y2 z
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:; ]; i9 q& t/ }5 R/ F& t9 Y" R3 _. _
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
& P# h* P& }6 G9 O* U% q
I agree you points that it could be illegal
4 e& K7 l  W) @5 T* p1 l3 ^9 v+ hbut that is still a "gray area"
9 A4 h( ?7 w0 |* E" p( jwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
7 i. O5 W5 ~" N' l, Y; d
/ i  D6 h; m5 k9 q# C9 _. \# U; W% Tanyway, I want to say that is0 Z  f* z7 s; `! e$ N
who is supposed to be protected by laws
  u) R1 K8 |/ I; _$ ncreators?/ ]8 g9 D  H6 g* n# T
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
* `: j" B" `- Flet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.; m3 \5 D0 l' X& s
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those1 I0 Z% q( W2 w1 i3 V$ u
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
+ y. q+ P. m& Q0 r* e/ |% d其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
5 C0 T  P) R: [9 g( D我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:! f$ ~5 D$ v4 g* j9 t; k" r
/ v$ X2 Y8 L5 n  t% ]
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
+ G  s' h6 ?: |# a3 I! t唔係喎!
4 \& c0 i6 ~9 Y1 c+ A7 Y0 c古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!& G+ F2 f' z; i0 h
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
# B+ U7 E  n- Z; z( c$ ]) ^9 ^% R佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!( i' {4 o2 j7 s% Y* ?2 ~6 g( p
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
* L& W6 \$ H# v* E: Q2 ]5 b7 i+ s一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!# [5 m# K+ n: O
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
1 F) i0 W! e' s5 t: }) a- _3 }! Nif so bad, dun download la, right?: j' G9 N4 H' ^+ w% P
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
- L/ d( f7 O1 Hbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct0 w+ ~# c/ h7 ]; e
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
2 Z/ K/ N6 T3 Lso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society5 \$ Q- w8 e8 K1 x5 J- g
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........4 F4 f: n6 `6 [
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
( L+ m+ X. i5 B' \( \so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
! P0 i7 Y7 T2 U9 N佢又唔係殺人放火~~~) s* ?# d( G& \( W
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
! n3 P2 a& ]( C. g: F+ X/ ]3 _# x錢就一定罰+ K+ a  M, {; z! m/ T- n
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
8 d$ h3 n1 V& a唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?8 o6 \% n3 ^# k/ A% Y1 R
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
, d$ Y" c/ z7 ?" L  ^0 P到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。