<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)& }: h$ ?- P! T' f; |- I+ h; s
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
2 M4 P& Q7 u0 H8 y  c5 |大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
( c- r! Z% v8 {% JI agree you points that it could be illegal3 j5 Y. f( S4 K1 W. {7 Y
but that is still a "gray area"* G* o# W# i) _
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair) @( _0 u5 D2 f
8 D/ Y  b) M1 p. k; Y: P0 S
anyway, I want to say that is
/ k" A* f; ?- v4 Lwho is supposed to be protected by laws4 d: v9 h0 m+ j* }3 t1 M7 j
creators?
1 c2 R. S7 }( y! Sbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market6 @; w1 `6 s$ R; ^/ f
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
" Y% g, c1 _. Q: n; [when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those8 [7 Y# N- R2 q  m$ F
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:: r: R5 p( w& {/ K3 x. e
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
  ~  o5 \9 n: [( `我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
2 L" o; e7 K  l- s" @  t8 v  w2 k& `
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
- c/ o6 t' d; d# k8 t: @唔係喎!6 @8 ]  e4 L+ _
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!6 O6 K( F7 T1 y& J9 E
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!( i/ v% L# }; L$ E7 g, e. h0 m% j
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!6 a* U9 I5 B! i0 {) H5 |
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
( ~7 Y: o% n: p$ [一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
0 _* f/ I. B+ s: a# bdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......3 `5 s9 r9 C( {* w
if so bad, dun download la, right?1 W+ u$ B5 V1 T2 F% p. x
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^' ^4 V; w% k" {" i
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct: R1 E7 \0 u. [9 i# v8 V# e
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
: Q7 L* x- ^8 O  Z3 P& }/ N# jso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society0 m1 P2 n+ A0 i1 d3 z
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
; o4 _# H: Y' V3 w, J/ Jwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!# |: z( ~; X+ M! j5 u7 [# U
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
+ c* r  P! K! j9 |* X; [佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
% Q6 h9 y- x' z- ~/ s, s政府想比下馬威0的人~~
4 F& T. _3 W1 {+ t$ T6 i錢就一定罰
% i3 F" B; o. n& o, ^5 m& p. _; K未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
( Q+ C& g: d3 I# g+ t唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
* m5 c0 \0 |2 R9 c佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?; {+ L$ ~  ^# R. y4 x
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。