<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
7 Z% O" w) \$ y& M' x5 s" R但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:+ |! G$ l6 w1 S  u
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
* c  L- j' a3 H7 r/ j/ ^: ^* j, _I agree you points that it could be illegal
" H) j- C5 G/ e4 `& v& V8 ibut that is still a "gray area"
. ~3 g3 W' L$ N0 fwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair8 p; h  }/ g4 n( z* p

# ?, k5 s7 U# Q- j$ Panyway, I want to say that is
/ M9 d( x6 z" ^- Ywho is supposed to be protected by laws5 ^7 M3 o" t& ^. g
creators?- W6 ]4 z8 d- }* i1 }8 A
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
& [: N: h1 m0 B$ H. ]$ _# Ulet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.1 H2 }4 O, e" M) \3 \( t
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
# `- X9 p9 V0 P+ x* d' L2 J  nWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
' A$ v, _% x0 h  ^! B9 b其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
8 d5 i: e1 V0 I% }
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:9 w. }; ?2 @% T# f2 \5 j7 q

; B, d/ u7 N0 E0 j$ c/ x9 Z6 s9 \+ b6 W我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
( Q3 Q  f! p; y3 i; t唔係喎!
, C# T1 s. j. N) A8 U+ [! @% u古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
/ O; ^' D( e" [8 X# A9 e* c我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!# U4 n, q8 |1 E: V9 s# @
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
- I& b! o1 g& J4 `# u就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事8 \" b6 h' x( C8 W$ {* s
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
7 P( p+ `3 Q9 @7 [7 s- d, ~dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......8 F/ J  Z  B. q5 g  S1 O; u6 y2 ^
if so bad, dun download la, right?
5 B' s! N$ w* Mi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
0 X0 B  l! S0 x* e/ _* dbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct! u4 c& ?: c; B% H3 R
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la9 b: r, r% y- }; w4 F. N. K' {
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
1 h5 _) W& K/ X4 musing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
) C- ^+ V! H" X2 L9 t+ N3 }7 Uwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
& V0 Z! J" }" U$ vso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
! I9 O& v2 v/ i+ u佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
* q* j) d; F8 L& Q3 Z0 n政府想比下馬威0的人~~
1 x' ^# z9 U  f: G" S* ?' V錢就一定罰# c0 h+ j/ b& O( s( `! t" q
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,+ V9 q" U3 ]4 F' A8 J, \0 k
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
* y% K% z9 K% G- u# `佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
) U* }' \1 A' u; Y1 ?; p# U到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。