<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)+ M  ?0 A& |/ A, E( }( ]7 T5 Z
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
. M1 g* k* S$ b: V( P" i3 a' T大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
( v) s0 {. q- \! n" R) t* v  p4 \
I agree you points that it could be illegal
( y1 \. z: d( A0 ?8 \9 v$ R6 A3 ubut that is still a "gray area"
1 |. z3 @) b* |) F) T" ]* dwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
2 k. K" ?0 k( S* a/ P# G9 ~, j* z; F' ~/ U7 t  @) u
anyway, I want to say that is
8 K' y. R' z& d& O  Z1 jwho is supposed to be protected by laws
+ _$ }6 i4 x6 c* qcreators?& ]6 n- _' U9 t9 u8 C
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
+ t5 a# L$ l  n4 w6 ]( glet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.: d5 E$ r' @/ g& g
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
/ A( B" I" x8 }0 tWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
2 }& p% |: @* x7 e6 `% F其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
: m' R6 O8 ?+ n3 ?% c: h+ C我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
8 t; A  _1 X0 Y7 [" p* L- [$ |& t' y1 `
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
- N5 t/ v6 E, [( I  M, q# w唔係喎!! ?; p+ S4 t& N* u& j9 J
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!$ f1 a5 h4 k% _" j! L
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!& K( [0 c( p: r" {
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!  Q  s0 H9 N/ o. J0 }% Y! F
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事+ l$ [* n6 T" q! E8 R0 z
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!, r$ y: e# U, q
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
: X% B2 [; E7 Z( Y+ }1 ~% ^9 V6 j6 zif so bad, dun download la, right?! a, K8 ^0 A3 e" E  O
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^# N1 }. w' N5 ]# q
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct4 ]1 O; e& T9 e2 r: H; V8 \' e8 H
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
3 t+ I7 f! z! W: H, Q# }so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society. L' G7 J; I# ?
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
/ G& x' F# J4 [why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!+ R' G$ }4 F. A  [7 v: ?
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!: c* Q  ]6 |1 P8 J  F5 n; J0 G
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
9 h/ c- G1 f; J  D政府想比下馬威0的人~~3 n9 _" @8 p% ?: w2 i' q
錢就一定罰8 Y. W2 X+ ^- J& L& `4 O
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,! g- q" W+ z. S$ X; Y; w& |
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?  N: }/ `" t+ _' m
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
. D2 P" f' [& [% ~6 K+ h到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。