<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)- W% u( R3 |1 I- S3 x) p" y
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
, R+ @) l2 `7 {; w. ]大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
$ e& R9 X4 _$ s) T9 ^: uI agree you points that it could be illegal
2 \# w5 W7 y4 c0 j' R/ ?but that is still a "gray area"
- V8 ]6 m; b! s7 y; J* n; Lwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
7 D( ]. Q6 T* q, _) l! a8 i, c/ g
9 I& ^& \% s0 Banyway, I want to say that is: X( f( T' T0 ]( Q% z3 m
who is supposed to be protected by laws0 {  b. B( |/ x' _
creators?
- r4 U& y' I! _  Q" `$ wbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
( y1 H/ W3 s! V2 glet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
+ L# `" F+ I1 A( z& @$ u* qwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
: c' f3 Y( o4 \2 q' J, AWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:& h2 \2 G  p$ j. v6 t4 O+ Z' e0 P0 T
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
# a0 M, m; z* A# S- r0 ^7 W# }; M- W  p我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
& F: x# y& n7 e5 t6 A
5 w9 }0 B3 c& u8 Y我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
! t$ R$ w: X9 f& o" n4 G2 X
唔係喎!
- w2 u" _$ Z4 Y; @$ t% l古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!' @. ^- T( `) t" h. |& v
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!+ G) x  D5 ^3 k* L& z( x& @# c
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!4 z: p' y7 U0 `3 l
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
7 o4 R- t, g- Y$ K* S3 D一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!2 o, F. v4 i0 B  Q! S7 Q, L
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......5 j8 t6 b3 X" E2 h5 B$ Q9 ^
if so bad, dun download la, right?2 H% d: e( B# n! z
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^# A( a, X" [- {5 u
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct" i" w: p6 s( P9 M4 t
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la8 h( @3 q( g  o( v- |
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
7 m) B8 [/ k: I4 pusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........  n' L# e  P1 r. O3 A+ _+ a1 ]8 A
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!( X9 m  }1 d$ M5 e7 F! _8 q3 w
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!: M- |" u" i" H+ K& C# Q3 ]
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
/ P# B( N/ e; Y. x. s) z. c" f% Z政府想比下馬威0的人~~) |6 Q) x3 Z, V
錢就一定罰/ B) g8 ]! }/ H$ p- @" b, A3 B
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
# w& h" f0 {2 w6 P2 V1 f唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
+ O' p5 w+ G0 b% H佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?: w- L0 J6 \3 j; Y
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。