<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大); _! q" U7 O2 K" g* a( y; [3 s5 |2 I
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:0 X# }, A2 f; a# J  x, x, v) x) M
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
; c; r! O6 P6 ?* \0 bI agree you points that it could be illegal
0 L% O- q! U$ K( N! ]5 ~but that is still a "gray area"0 @7 C% h9 X' O" U+ E2 [3 F  H
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
. `5 E5 z7 r9 o8 G. H" o; |  t
4 w% U" ~8 g- P; G% I) sanyway, I want to say that is2 f  n! n; G! U) H+ [" q' w3 H
who is supposed to be protected by laws" z7 O- @% N- l( h$ r1 }) }  @
creators?
' s: c/ Z4 `$ M! C8 Xbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market' W+ o0 `% w* }1 b) O
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.; d5 P2 I! S( _* }) L  V
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
7 c8 H- @' E$ |: i5 }$ \4 ~% s; y0 TWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
1 z, @4 L7 L7 T其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
* I" H5 |/ x8 o7 X/ h% U
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:1 ^& C7 }* Q+ y* n0 v

- g  q; R; P6 T$ i" W7 _我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
$ z7 e, d: G% ^, j7 D$ O. _: P
唔係喎!
$ v. f0 H8 R( D0 ]3 o* w1 `古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!3 D8 @0 W! O, b; ]2 O6 }/ M
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!. {* `9 M9 z9 ~# X% I' K0 `
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!( D5 k/ c+ s( F- \# W
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
) ]" k; S4 v; A% ]/ j8 \8 T一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
- {: M- Z; w5 A6 I; sdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
0 M) o" R4 D) V. f, f' a6 F* |' s; o( `if so bad, dun download la, right?
% @& L! a( a2 [, I0 `! O8 ni am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
3 w' a8 d* `9 A" \/ vbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct$ R: N5 x8 p4 g
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la8 J8 E& j3 Q0 {+ o; D0 k4 c! X' @
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
$ l, Y" g% E8 e7 O9 F, wusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
" T6 A9 I7 T8 ywhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!, z8 c" \+ S4 P6 i- P
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
, c" v5 c) d3 o; r. T佢又唔係殺人放火~~~5 X, l5 g( _) y  a. S
政府想比下馬威0的人~~' k' `! H& w2 B% \! m; V
錢就一定罰
1 o! t" }8 b* p# [: z未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,- h  g2 ]) n+ s( f
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?7 l% z0 y0 S! c2 o- ^! m* i
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
. i, B7 j' ^  B! k到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。