<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
/ ?. l2 E2 d  q, [: H) t但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
- {9 Q, A* t8 A3 O大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
' R1 g1 h6 {8 k, j! O. j4 w9 i$ k: W
I agree you points that it could be illegal7 V7 T/ Q, }# ], E, c1 N; K
but that is still a "gray area"
% A! A$ Y+ z4 b+ Bwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair/ b1 X9 O) p) w; d3 I, x/ k+ K
7 {. M1 K/ M4 k5 N9 Q* Y) S* k
anyway, I want to say that is
" {. l: k' j6 |; z" Owho is supposed to be protected by laws
7 `2 W9 P9 _" N, P) m. W9 ycreators?
, e! c7 K; w, d" t% {but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
: ]6 s( A0 g; V7 klet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money., v! `4 ~" M  R  O+ V) K
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those( @. N5 u6 e6 }; V8 W
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
8 x: L& O: d" Q/ `7 w9 ]其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
0 b1 D, d' F8 X: ]! Y
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
! ~! k" W8 F; p$ A! ~1 n
8 y- F* W8 U0 D- o6 l: [8 X我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
" U  w& a- b9 F2 L+ t% V唔係喎!; D* K% _% L# M1 Y4 |
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!* A8 c' `8 F$ F# w- T; y
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!, J* [  l2 A" o' D- ]. H0 x/ V
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!& b1 F2 A3 [/ {
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
" t) ^' \2 @6 y: L7 I一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!1 T/ ~3 F, y  |9 [: Z3 E
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......# T# p9 C% Z$ a$ y4 R% ^
if so bad, dun download la, right?
# }2 R- o: H$ O3 C# mi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
( R, j  l1 h- ]) [2 g# [but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct1 q2 P) O  I( S  p4 a6 n9 o
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la0 I! U( E4 a# V  _+ ]4 m
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
- C. x" s2 F% qusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema........./ {/ N% W; F/ d$ j  ]& J
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!* ]& ?8 {! |# ]# S
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!( Y7 J9 B9 F2 G" Z# Z! x8 {
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~2 G7 A; a" A3 L/ O  u0 q" ]7 T' l3 }
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
5 K8 `2 k" T" ^) F& }錢就一定罰
4 Z0 a. Q+ u7 e0 Z未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
; X; E2 {1 _" v7 H; n4 C唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?3 _9 T  c7 M/ s
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
( S0 E$ a) d- Z, M) W4 l# i2 e到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。