<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
! A: J6 t$ _+ p& z  z但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:, J( N6 f+ Q0 ]7 v+ s% v% f1 I: {
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
/ m) D* o0 g9 S- G8 j) z; A8 @* TI agree you points that it could be illegal! z- k. X, A. d# t
but that is still a "gray area"
9 P. m9 ^2 r% V  F4 q- i6 u9 uwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair/ Y5 t1 T9 y: |4 G: m3 W
% U' C7 d7 I/ ]; s+ C, Q+ z
anyway, I want to say that is
' r9 z5 i- q& T2 O& i" Xwho is supposed to be protected by laws: L9 `. \7 M7 z! J9 d5 d8 }
creators?
8 }& ]+ D) b. Ibut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
1 m% b! `: E+ m+ tlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.+ G, y) j  Z) f4 @+ G
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those0 W/ ]1 a) M! G& K. h# C9 ]
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:' O+ l: c3 U4 {/ o0 k3 F
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
  v+ s- e+ W  |4 \7 }& p我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:, X5 q# \2 u6 |) z4 T" x, C- a
$ a% ?5 \" R2 V) y8 y) c7 J/ w
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
6 K2 K  ]+ C! M, L% Y; O0 B" y唔係喎!
- G5 P! T* S' C1 ^# x* e古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!. V1 k# F( N5 }) `2 \' V
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!# C/ R2 l" ?& P, e4 r, w- _5 p: ~
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
; I" D1 M, j1 A9 P& m* {; y就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事7 r; ^  ^( U- q; x0 U+ z5 |
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
( t! W7 k3 E& _! O5 Ldun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
1 |6 O3 l$ W: W: i$ h1 U* Xif so bad, dun download la, right?" J  ~6 }' V  }3 S% c
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^. g3 q5 z- t8 k/ f' c
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct5 s0 c% R1 f; E! w9 \" E5 n
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la* {! T( u% u# Q
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society7 `9 `$ l, p8 \/ u; V/ K
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
" Q  j+ H  r7 J* L" O0 A9 a6 \* ewhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!3 a5 K7 d4 k7 l# c7 J5 r& _
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
. K# p( e/ [. N5 t# t佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
0 t" T# X% Z! d: I5 D政府想比下馬威0的人~~
2 K5 F' g7 `$ W: N錢就一定罰
7 W5 F5 N4 x% N未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,! p$ v, V; L1 a: l
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?% S7 Z4 E6 g+ y. P9 a4 h! g% B
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
3 [7 I8 N2 T1 U/ z) f( B8 V到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。