<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
/ \# \2 l! x( |& R. `但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
7 X, t$ E! z4 ]1 C  ?( o大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
* e( J& |( m0 P; R; s& L1 c
I agree you points that it could be illegal
* b" `6 s- A! D' ?! e, m" j( rbut that is still a "gray area"
( [- `( c, j0 C( ]  j+ w7 Nwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
0 V& D( o1 X' K: j0 [: e3 Q9 `% G7 v3 f! S9 N& I/ g: o& R
anyway, I want to say that is$ u* m" M. \1 G, B; o
who is supposed to be protected by laws9 k' T" @" O; [' N# ?
creators?, \7 R- q3 U- G' j5 u+ n0 o
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
1 a/ J$ Z# S0 |+ n; ~% klet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.) t# _$ E/ i5 ^$ a" ~& ?
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those% N: z: Y/ O5 |: {
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:% T7 l/ ~% d* X6 ?8 Y& a
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
9 I5 T  }& S$ [& j我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:! A, c; S& j' y

3 N: C1 Y# ^, B我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
; R+ T" z7 W: \4 E' `; f- g
唔係喎!
/ k' d" q& O" P古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!% _- V' e$ O% o* Q: F% Y
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
" I) l' c4 {8 C3 Z% }佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
# L" F  H  z- D' g- z4 [就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
+ O8 ~/ o" r$ @  E& z! {6 P一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
. ?8 n. f! j$ o% y. [dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
, X$ F% ~. y+ _if so bad, dun download la, right?* o! |9 l1 Y* B" [. b6 z
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
& }2 N% S* \7 O; p! g" Obut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct' m/ w5 X. o# F1 i
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
$ w: [0 L9 @$ eso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
& s! @, T; ]; r* t+ T3 r. Q2 Ausing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
4 i& T, m, o# a& \% E6 e3 V1 Iwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
; G4 F0 i  V! _7 o3 ]4 |so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
, i$ _0 w  n' V$ f佢又唔係殺人放火~~~, x3 m, Q8 l7 K- i1 U$ |
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
0 ?! y* T5 }3 s% X錢就一定罰
; _2 e4 u/ u) s% D; \未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,' ^5 F; W2 k7 U
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?0 y7 N$ g% _' P
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?1 P: T  K9 v& `  K0 _$ ^+ W# j4 m
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。