locklock

Originally posted by eric911 at 2007-8-20 09:09 PM:
好難講，賓帥買左咁多兵，個個都...

你都有攞馬會份野！陳冠希好似阿倫史密夫！邊似呀！
佢話容祖兒係白版艾辛！咁又真係有幾分相似架！


　　　　　　　　　　　人類出世也是一個離開也是一個

[ Last edited by locklock on 2007-8-20 at 09:28 PM ]

eqhigh

Originally posted by filter-052fans at 2007-8-20 05:51 PM:


我唔覺得, 就算光頭佬哥連拿, 都...
只要叫雞後唔洗30秒, 就全世界幾億人知道吹錯, 但只有場中幾條友唔知,
根本係一個大諷刺....

方駿輝真係咁講

brightlee

I watch the highlight show again. If I was Rob Styles and stood in that position
I would give a penalty to Chelsea

Cos I saw Finnan was trying to take a really bad tackle, the Chelsea player was jumping up to prevent it.....

It's still a foul, remember a foul is a foul, couldn't escape........

Similar situation as C. Ronaldo was sent off by Steve Bennett 2 years ago when Man City vs Man Utd. C. Ronaldo didn't touch Andrew Cole, but that's definity a foul ... a professional foul, straight RED

eqhigh

Originally posted by eric911 at 2007-8-20 09:09 PM:


好難講，賓帥買左咁多兵，個個都...

佢解釋番話...第二張黃牌係比泰利既
而唔係比艾辛

不過我就唔多信啦
我覺得係佢自己比左兩張黃牌艾辛,,但後尾知左先去兜番

睇勻全場，依場波既球證先生的確”有料到”

brightlee

Originally posted by eqhigh at 2007-8-20 23:25:


佢解釋番話...第二張黃牌係比泰利...

haha... upcoming news from soccernet!!!!

Referees' chief Keith Hackett has confirmed Rob Styles will not take charge of a match next weekend after his performance in the game between Liverpool and Chelsea at Anfield on Sunday.

Rob Styles and Jamie Carragher
Allsport
Jamie Carragher has words with Rob Styles after his controversial penalty decision.

Styles controversially awarded Chelsea a penalty which enabled the Blues to equalise after Fernando Torres' opener, before causing confusion by brandishing a yellow card at Michael Essien - who had already been booked - but insisting it was John Terry being booked.

And Hackett, general manager of Professional Game Match Officials Limited, told Sky Sports: 'Accountability exists and we, the PGMOL, do expect referees to get big decisions correct.

'On this occasion it was wrong and therefore Rob will not be officiating next weekend.'

Hackett also revealed assistant referee Ian Gosling will be given next weekend off, after he denied Fulham a late goal at home to Middlesbrough when David Healy clearly forced the ball over the line.

The referees' supremo even apologised to Rafael Benitez and Lawrie Sanchez - Liverpool and Fulham manager respectively.

On Styles, Hackett added: 'I spoke to Rob this morning and obviously he is extremely disappointed with the decision and admitted he got it wrong. I have left a message with Rafael Benitez to apologise.

'Having looked at a video and seen a better angle and a better view, clearly he (Styles) now recognises that he got it wrong and he's deeply apologetic for that. I think, in fact, he too will be making contact with Liverpool in order to offer his apologies.'

Asked about the confusion when Essien appeared to be booked for a second time, Hackett said: 'I'm informed by both the fourth official and Rob he retained the card shown to John Terry then held the card to indicate a direct free-kick, and failed to put the card away. So it was a basic, if you like, admin error as against an error in application of law.

'We'll look at the video to ensure we don't get a repeat of that.'

Hackett also confirmed Gosling, who wrongly ruled Boro goalkeeper Mark Schwarzer prevented Healy's effort from crossing the line, will also be without a game this weekend.

'Clearly the assistant referee has made an error, so he won't be operating next week for us either.'

eric911

Originally posted by locklock at 2007-8-20 09:16 PM:

你都有攞馬會份野！陳冠希好似阿...

英雄所見略同﹗

Flea

Originally posted by brightlee at 2007-8-20 09:23 PM:
I watch the highlight show again. I...

I think no one will give a penalty

There is a very very minor body contact in this case and mourluda had no intention to get the ball. The only body contact is he jumped into Finnan

so it cannot be a foul

amigofans

Originally posted by brightlee at 2007-8-20 09:23 PM:
I watch the highlight show again. I...

即使你係球証, 我都不同意果一球係一個12碼,
根本完全無身體接觸, 何來犯規? 因為芬倫果勢唔好?

球証如果因為咁去判, 覺得佢個勢係想犯規同好狼,
呢個只係一個推測, 即係一個球員如果發老脾,
手執拳頭狀想打人, 但最後無打到, 可以給佢紅牌嗎?

我覺得係一個電光火石間, 腦根上既錯誤,
睇番佢尋晚整體既表現, 你就已經知道佢亂晒大龍...

我較欣賞普爾, 錯就要認, 而呢位史泰奧斯,
真係人如其名, 有style不認錯....

球証都係人, 球証謗証睇中眉彈地波, 睇offside,
或好似尋晚既禁區內犯規, 如果真係睇唔到,
作為球証, 唔斷古可以點???

所以我先講, 錄像係100%應該引入幫手!!

jef2i

.......球證攪到liverpool 輸

eqhigh

Originally posted by jef2i at 2007-8-21 11:14 AM:
.......球證攪到liverpool 輸

和波姐~
不過個球證又的確係影響左依場波唔少