brightlee

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2006-5-18 23:23:

唔係龍門要做的嗎?
講真,其實唔係好明

即是這個例子,他踢底伊度而阻止一個直接入球機會
因為伊度當時係直接射鬥而被踢低,所以球証紅牌!

但如果佢俾得益
那會阻止進攻機會?
何來會有牌?

佢那個犯規又不屬危險犯規

YUEN_LOUIS

Originally posted by brightlee at 2006-5-18 09:32 PM:


即是這個例子,他踢底伊度而阻止一...

其實以阿仙奴的打法,好似列文比人逐仲好

brightman

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2006-5-18 09:40 PM:

其實以阿仙奴的打法,好似列文比人逐仲好

打少個對阿仙奴防守無影響, 但係大大減低左進攻火力...本來亨利係前場攞波個陣巴塞一定要有兩個後衛包位至可以mark到佢[尋晚佩奧爾比亨利ko], 咁樣後上皮里斯入楔會好有機會...但係打小一個之後皮里斯調出. 前面單靠亨利就困難好多, 因為變左佩奧爾同馬古斯一齊睇亨利..亨利好難突破, 而後面法比加斯又無咁快上到黎, 變左阿仙奴既快攻同小組好少機會可以打到出黎.

brightman

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2006-5-18 08:45 PM:
我覺得係雲格有d抵死~點解呢?
大家諗...

唔覺得campell同cole打得唔好, 佢地算打得唔錯...但係對手係攻力強勁既巴塞..加上打小一個人差唔多成80分鐘同埋落大雨. 失波非戰之罪

srfqt1

Originally posted by brightlee at 2006-5-18 09:32 PM:


即是這個例子,他踢底伊度而阻止一...

個球證話佢有可能俾得益+黃牌

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=368318&cc=3436

'The match started well, then obviously there was the incident with the sending-off. At this point I would have liked to have taken a few more seconds before I made my decision.'

Hauge, who will not referee at this summer's World Cup in Germany, put this haste down to the fact he was 'incredibly focused.'

'The ideal thing would have been to wait a few seconds,' he continued.

'If I'd done that, I could have given the goal and eventually given a yellow card. Of course everyone wants a goal, so this was a key situation.'  

YUEN_LOUIS

Originally posted by brightman at 2006-5-18 10:05 PM:

唔覺得campell同cole打得唔好, 佢地算打得唔錯...但係對手係攻力強勁既巴塞..加上打小一個人差唔多成80分鐘同埋落大雨. 失波非戰之罪

佢地係運的問題~a,高爾幾下剷波都靚

night

後防太年輕依個pt唔成立啦

點都只計到eboue,不過sol同coe打得比佢還衰

YUEN_LOUIS

Originally posted by night at 2006-5-18 10:11 PM:
後防太年輕依個pt唔成立啦

點都只計到eboue,不過sol同coe打得比佢還衰

阿仙奴靠後生防線入決賽嘅~
所以,阿仙奴有的是機會

YUEN_LOUIS

係喎~無線係咪話列文係第一個係決賽拎紅牌的人?

YUEN_LOUIS

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2006-5-18 10:07 PM:


個球證話佢有可能俾得益+黃牌

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=368318&cc=3436

還掂都死,列文應該剷球證

[ Last edited by YUEN_LOUIS on 2006-5-18 at 10:20 PM ]