shaqkobe

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-12-31 00:41:

呢d 全部都係控衛喎...雖然o'neal 加盟 haet, duncan 加盟 spurs 有同樣效果
以往 t-mac 打魔術同速龍都做過控衛, 如果佢重操故業會唔會有改變呢?

我寧願佢做返依家既小前鋒/得分後衛。無可能埋沒佢晒搶分能力，因為火箭可以搶分既人已經唔多。。

nikinikiniki

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-12-26 03:11 AM:

拉舒可以叫做係有個人得分能力唔係...

我唔係咁應同呀..Rasheed 之前的打法好勁爆的，禁區到3分線都有得分能力，
防守強，次次對Duncun，duncun d得分一係好低，
仲記得佢timeout o個時"星"左沙邦尼斯一巴，真係好爆下，
轉左去detriot之後，佢將得分責任都放比其他人，少d得分，大局為重，
同上年Detriot同indiana打大交佢冇出手..就知佢收哂火。
所以感覺上佢差左，但係Rasheed的得分能力一定唔弱...

bigfish

Originally posted by nikinikiniki at 2006-1-2 03:09 AM:



我唔係咁應同呀..Rasheed 之前...

執到啦佢, 本來冇 rasheed, detroit 都係一隊勁旅, 都夠贏總冠軍, 佢入到去就執到隻冠軍指環, 如果佢仲留o係 blazer, 今年都唔知點

nikinikiniki

hoston太過依賴T-mac.
Yau又一直打唔起，籃板..真係唔好提...
佢真係太柔弱了，同太過中國人，太謙讓喇，成日比人in your face,
所以d人就唔怕你。冇O'Neal或Big Ben o個種"禁區我話事"o個隻feel...
我覺得trade走Yau 換多幾個禁區苦力好過

[ Last edited by nikinikiniki on 2006-1-2 at 03:31 AM ]

asianballer66

it seems to me that neither tmac nor yao ming is more important...they just can't be compared in terms of importance...they r equally important just like what skjeiw said: a left leg is as important as a right leg. some of u may say tmac is definitely more important...but i dun think so! he just doesn't have leadership...just think about Orlando Magic couple yrs ago...he was unable to lead the team ...not too sure but i remember Orlando ended up getting the worst record.

甘國武

Originally posted by nikinikiniki at 2006-1-2 03:15 AM:
hoston太過依賴T-mac.
Yau又一直打唔...

>太過中國人，太謙讓

唔好聽：沒能力阻止
好聽：太謙讓

所以話呢，中國人修辭能力認真一流~

nashisthebestpg

Originally posted by bigfish at 2006-1-2 03:12 AM:

執到啦佢, 本來冇 rasheed, detroit 都係一隊勁旅, 都夠贏總冠軍, 佢入到去就執到隻冠軍指環, 如果佢仲留o係 blazer, 今年都唔知點

無sheed 的話活塞唔夠拎冠軍ga,
記得佢未黎之前,活塞只係一支東岸勁隊, 但係到東岸決賽都係俾藍網掃走左.....
嗰陣活塞無乜人打內線.....內線防守都係得老ben....
係到第二季季中,活塞係鷹隊換佢番黎, 完成埋最後一塊平圖, 先有奪標能力~
sheed黎左活塞之後,無以前咁火爆, 佢內線的進攻與防守經驗幫左活塞好多~

shaqkobe

Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-2 12:17:

無sheed 的話活塞唔夠拎冠軍ga,
記...

完全同意。

asianballer66

shaqkobe, in ur previous post (forgot which one), u said that we can't really compare Kobe or tmac with kidd due to different position and i dun think this statement is too right...i mean, if we can't compare players with different position, how else was jordan known to be the best!? The best simply means better than others "in different positions". itz hard to compare, but itz certainly possilbe to compare...something that can always be distinguished from a all-star player and a not so all-star player would be his ability to knock down shots in crunch time, ability to lead a team, etc..and i think these criteria might be how all-star players in different positions are evaluated...RIGHT??

bigfish

Originally posted by filter-074baller66 at 2006-1-2 03:39 PM:
shaqkobe, in ur previous post (forg...

so kidd 係 all-star player, t-mac & kobe 呢??
我覺得以星味計, t-mac 同 kobe 都穩据前列, 起碼佢地對專用鞋長出長有丫
jason kidd 係頂級球員, 尤其打反擊o既球隊最需要佢, so 我諗係戰術問題令人覺得佢係最佳控衛啦, 但係打陣地戰o個陣佢個效用就用 t-mac 同 kobe 咁明顯, 起碼佢唔可以憑爆發力切入禁區博犯規 or 走籃丫, 相反我覺得 t-mac 同 kobe 打反擊係有能力傳到一d jason kidd 傳到o既波, 不過佢地心態上唔願意咁做o者, so 以能力計, kidd 同另外兩位真係差少少