- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:8 X6 h4 p, Y" O2 k. Z2 R5 g3 G
. h3 S r5 [" J
9 U: b* n# d- u) _
同意.) b: ]4 D) H6 U4 n# [5 @7 b7 V
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... % J1 |0 }' L! S8 h/ x1 s3 N
- ?1 l2 }/ Z4 a0 vI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
, i- Z4 u. ^ PYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
S4 j. ], A/ @" ~9 l8 ]. WI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
( H/ n3 W7 c( W$ _. G& XAs a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.' \: M, _' B7 Z0 b) B
% }/ O J' H1 a T4 m' z3 ^6 [6 u0 @
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
( A% y/ n W' a0 @: W; z7 W" g# B5 Z4 u2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper, r: ~. d" x+ y5 `, s* o1 s
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
+ ]8 u* d/ O3 C3 A! c
, T$ X5 `$ ?& }+ C: D% b# s$ Y/ ?Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|