- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
/ M( u( E+ u# K8 {: D
$ t( R4 T8 S4 A0 A& A6 Y# [, Z9 s7 ?& Z; a5 v& M: f2 c0 V
同意.0 k* D" P) F, b1 J& ]
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... ' Z/ m0 @' C" w( ]& H7 w- s: S
8 m4 T$ b& j9 V2 cI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
2 _& I& O8 Z) q6 v z( pYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students# E, d( K& r% f, T; v
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
3 D5 B$ i1 m" [. ]* |+ jAs a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.8 [3 D& K$ i" s1 h, V
* U+ Q8 E2 o- |4 P' d1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
+ Z5 U. Q; B% i3 t, j W+ C2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
. q6 ^4 U7 x. L" J' Z( u3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
2 z& z% s) P: _: {- B$ x& [# F4 ?4 \" J @
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|