 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
: H* s3 Z3 n$ {; A0 @. R1 g" X9 H% i1 T# f1 Z& Z
7 V* n2 u8 S& [: X. d6 T, [1 u* \同意.
9 s' }5 ~( [5 u. O2 l但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... 5 y1 S7 P+ h4 V" U p: O: Q
9 }/ A! ~3 q, E0 h1 j' g' HI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
7 Q6 c; t) ]2 V% d! zYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
3 T4 l' t) v G b( H, U0 j7 MI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.+ Y$ v3 I' ^5 G# g' J
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
# X, e4 t! [" H! w, f4 k9 P( ~8 ~3 @
& k9 ^' W( U4 ~( e; p1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
4 \0 q# H& R0 Z2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
. y7 P! z9 d- z ?3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published5 U' K/ H: a- Q3 a
i% { x7 l4 ?# y5 I6 QThanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|