<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
0 B+ Z5 A  x2 Z  v" l( I/ s  e但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
3 c( a- @8 C1 ?/ a( {4 d大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
2 Y! v: J5 k& t$ G2 x" V* r3 zI agree you points that it could be illegal
. y) e9 ~$ W+ F- A* W8 Fbut that is still a "gray area"- S$ ?- z) L! e1 ^
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
3 J& a8 H7 F6 [& e
/ r1 V+ U  G* Z1 ?" }( T6 }anyway, I want to say that is$ q# }% x" ?( u
who is supposed to be protected by laws' J/ }  l! n8 i6 r  L
creators?: w, O0 i2 @# e" {+ E% `6 p0 k
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
6 D  B/ Q8 M; Q1 @% A- Q9 `' k9 wlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
) g7 m! O1 R4 [2 E$ |when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those6 `% S3 y) h2 n2 D( _( O& `$ m5 H
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:0 Z* d' H0 f/ p0 v3 G
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
2 X: _# g0 ~/ A我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
3 O% S* I0 o  q4 i0 |9 \  K4 M" _0 ?. ~
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
9 `8 I5 T) M! u/ l8 q唔係喎!
0 Q) G; o4 y8 k' |3 [$ b' `古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!# K, u& D1 S9 y  x& L: l4 K. f8 m" T
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
1 Q" U7 J/ W* N6 d# G% K$ X: U8 m佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!- n5 n; _/ W' [/ }2 f
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
! l4 P7 G, i4 ]- G; I一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!9 i, h4 N- T* {
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
. o- [1 |' {) a6 ~( m" Yif so bad, dun download la, right?5 W, k4 f: C$ Z
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
7 J" `) R  V; m  pbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct/ G& B' D# ]/ w# T4 s0 \/ d/ K! b
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la# X8 k$ K0 T  ~9 ?1 H
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
* k7 I" |& q( \3 _" J. |using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
2 c4 m4 i! s( _+ |" R: Owhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!4 e* j2 V* h5 b, {! w
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
- C+ c& N3 l( J佢又唔係殺人放火~~~! y- n# ^; ?9 b" t: E# \
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
/ M' m4 w5 F1 R8 B" E/ W錢就一定罰
2 b! F- x: c3 g0 c5 `未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,5 i! z. c# D; h/ x0 S
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?+ J* w- x0 D8 l6 \
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
! n8 }5 U$ e7 @" B" m% v到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。