<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)' S2 r% J) R8 x' {4 [: Z( G# D8 u  T/ K) q
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
7 D! L" _) v) c7 Q" x, b大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
, N* ~, X. i) `8 t+ q! z- d
I agree you points that it could be illegal+ n8 {& b6 N3 X4 d" z9 F
but that is still a "gray area"
* J& C9 W- |& |+ |% j; ?/ g: Q8 b3 z+ Pwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair" r& w' _+ o% W9 d- ]) i$ A8 }* d

  Z+ G8 B# n/ w5 }7 P( O8 j0 Aanyway, I want to say that is0 i% B; T4 U9 i. k- l
who is supposed to be protected by laws" Q' f% ?  ]2 w0 v
creators?
+ `% F6 P  t7 tbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market& O1 K% Y- e1 b& K0 M
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.) Q7 D1 s6 {6 Y0 w. o: K0 N$ G
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those, a3 p; K: J+ S
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:" F, y& K& R/ K3 Z
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
0 }0 `$ i, \; L( M; v) B4 z
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
' i, _" C; N$ ^; {, X! f. u6 p
8 Q, Q0 F' g* N6 [+ e/ I我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
0 w2 b8 `7 X, Y- ]1 d' \唔係喎!# ~# P- e  e! e& c% J& [+ p
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
  y( t  U* V* Z% p& S0 {0 @2 b" j我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
# K! P7 c4 M1 Z* e+ j: x佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
4 y. C) H2 [# s% J就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事% {2 J& j; a$ E) S5 F7 c2 D/ ~
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!6 M6 a# O; I5 T9 d# d
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......$ P8 k5 S" u+ E/ _/ |1 J
if so bad, dun download la, right?' c( o& Y2 w# V0 K6 A% m
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
. E( R% @* k) [5 M( H; ubut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
$ \/ j  J3 I. q1 @no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
* a& W8 i, U6 p, }% R3 N9 fso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
; T' p1 \9 W8 h. Cusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
4 O- u/ c6 o  V3 W: kwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!/ s- b8 ~+ f9 b6 e1 S: k
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
' E2 `1 X9 a! Z佢又唔係殺人放火~~~) T! W& v8 P$ a
政府想比下馬威0的人~~* ^  R; j1 A  U( s# R9 W" L
錢就一定罰, v" [2 z; |, x1 L1 H
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,! ?  h# _1 x* M
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
; X+ X! ]  d& {, f佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
+ b- x+ O, g- P到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。