<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)6 s7 Y. ^$ I3 v* S# r
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:2 @$ l. m) F7 m3 `( ~
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
$ n! s) Z4 E* h5 }' CI agree you points that it could be illegal; R3 d2 r' N; k  e
but that is still a "gray area"" K6 N: Q) o: r5 Z
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair* t- K6 B& Y, n7 E6 ~
6 K' y: R/ _4 g. g# z
anyway, I want to say that is
2 v# j& m) _6 i; z; Q2 fwho is supposed to be protected by laws6 ~* ?( E, p2 H: L3 j0 b
creators?
' }7 ?, a% S+ z8 N5 ]but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
' L: y0 |' K# d" ]& {. Dlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
# v* F+ B0 r8 N# {4 zwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
% P6 D1 }9 W9 a" LWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
/ O3 s/ G# x5 M3 j  j: S其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
9 ~4 {: c! A- a' o6 B& y0 T# k
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:; W; W1 n4 \" \, |6 C) c: N6 g

# V9 U" }* f# }我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
$ K. X; W) G2 l! V' r4 |& {
唔係喎!9 k; N2 Y4 Q+ i8 x1 e7 \3 d
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
; p: R" @- l- P+ _8 x5 A我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!2 V5 X( G2 e5 f+ |3 T# u1 n
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!  f9 u, ?  b* a9 t) u& n. G
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
) ~6 f$ G( K+ n. U( o; C& Y一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
5 e4 A" q/ c) ~1 c6 _5 edun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......) v6 F  x: c5 L/ p% k/ N/ N0 [8 x
if so bad, dun download la, right?  q$ M/ Q9 T( o0 L# _; z7 [( w
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
! n  W. S" r3 ^# b) j; V3 ^+ Ebut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
; [8 V4 m8 R0 h& dno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la; j6 J& ]& F1 m  y7 X0 |5 Z
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
( f3 n1 o; _& D1 R' n0 jusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
1 M: @" }  B/ jwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
' E$ ]3 k1 r: F6 G4 Xso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!# x( o% F9 v+ _( j
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
: ]6 {( ]$ \5 J- Q# J1 F. t# ?政府想比下馬威0的人~~7 J0 |: X7 b# O9 I8 o9 ^( I8 T
錢就一定罰
+ E" C0 ]! D( N" x' h未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,2 B+ t" q* j! f
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
+ ]- h8 Q$ q) j, O佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
# |# n: u. ]: c  _3 T到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。