<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
# ~( i4 Q6 K3 w9 a0 n" k但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:& L, N7 c, I9 p4 I* I* Y6 U
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
6 L4 Q  a8 ~. ]# g( t7 nI agree you points that it could be illegal9 _0 B1 R, I! Q' k8 ^
but that is still a "gray area"
3 X5 S$ H; w1 e3 p) M0 Owhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair/ m+ Z# P8 E& b2 N

  ?( @( z. s4 i0 e) Qanyway, I want to say that is
% b5 j) l$ ]# O& h' }& rwho is supposed to be protected by laws
% y; p# X. M9 y! o4 Lcreators?
7 N5 K5 G! O+ z. wbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market& `1 V  y2 p8 L& _
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.: s8 A2 H5 S" [
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those3 q; w& L1 |" K% U3 C% C$ Q3 B
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:* \# A+ }  H1 j
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
8 `- n- l' [- _2 P9 G我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
; v' O# p; Z6 w0 g% T4 r! A6 X' s) Y" R! W1 @
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
2 `8 f% |" p1 ]0 i& C" n4 y
唔係喎!2 D0 L: Z$ g+ ^' B/ @
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!: ~+ E* ?9 W9 R. Y1 L
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
- @  I! g5 T6 j' L- ~佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!' \0 z" u+ o* W0 D8 C
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
. i/ }' k2 e8 u7 J6 e5 y' B一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!. H! v/ U4 {. |: u/ V( C. _
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
0 W" {+ m; G+ B4 c% gif so bad, dun download la, right?
' D" c7 X; o2 _# z' X0 ^  l0 D# |i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
  L  I# e$ O6 Z) P$ j3 A8 b/ _but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct8 B7 B* Q* K) D% g) y
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la) ?, T1 B8 d: p0 S$ r
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society5 C: F( k! [- Y
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........# z  u: D7 z. V
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
  [* `3 @( m: w+ a2 [2 @3 lso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!0 F$ e, {; z& G7 Z
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
" }$ }' H; C: [* K8 ]政府想比下馬威0的人~~7 y6 _6 G) g, b6 D  p$ R) n$ @2 D
錢就一定罰
& c4 ~' E- }9 G8 ~+ ?未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
& h- L# O: {. e# I# \, ~唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?4 l% c5 Q- H- w! S* {1 v
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?" \# {5 ~  I3 H6 r5 A
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。