<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)! ?6 K% {9 F2 h& E, E6 {
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:9 [+ r" _* h/ ^
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
0 j% h* a" x) w9 rI agree you points that it could be illegal- x$ F5 W% w% X+ M. K0 J7 m
but that is still a "gray area"
) L8 O0 O. N3 e6 R* s1 Twhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair4 \8 w9 e9 q8 }; W
- [0 y5 s3 g+ @& d! ^' p. p
anyway, I want to say that is5 ?2 u& Y- w" ~* Q0 u
who is supposed to be protected by laws
2 r; A$ i! T+ o/ x6 ycreators?
, P2 j( i1 L# [but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
: Q$ U7 p: G; J' Zlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.. D! ~% Q4 l4 N( N9 n
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
2 T& {7 D2 [. GWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:, n- d* h% A9 k7 n) f
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
: U1 |- O; R/ r7 ]# x& P
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
7 L9 d3 P6 }, G/ f  j% h1 ]7 [- L7 I) b/ I
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
9 Q+ |$ @- j) p唔係喎!4 E' M$ I" u6 ?1 x" I6 J
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
, i, u& L# M1 P2 b* u5 f: H  t我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
4 B+ g7 M& _: l佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!* [: ?4 w& D& I# N: V4 }5 B1 @5 v) A! p
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
8 g5 ?) w' H5 m6 n" [0 P; E4 E8 s一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!3 y( L# b! b, p0 h7 A
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......  L7 f2 ?: G4 j5 Q0 Q7 v7 y
if so bad, dun download la, right?2 L! h7 _- R! F( `5 A4 i
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^$ A  A5 n  q3 g( r) y6 k& \
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct  R( r( T' B' a: Z" q9 z- I6 e
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
& h/ ?: E7 s! e/ }# {& @+ p* Q1 Yso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society" z- y, |' U  Q) R  ?: F
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema........./ I# }3 Q- v5 {7 _, g& @
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!  Q: F6 E: v; y8 f; S, ?6 J) X
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
( s& m4 ]7 t. f' @7 C" x& k! k佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
4 N8 S" J( I6 z; d: w政府想比下馬威0的人~~) w9 z$ S5 m$ ?7 M
錢就一定罰, }  ~  J, t" |6 I; }
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
7 Y4 [' D9 T/ o! e唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
4 E: d- n8 H+ u, c9 k2 O4 ?  Z9 e& e佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
6 s4 k9 X, J. u% r) j到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。