<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)# h: t) m4 w1 S6 B* \
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
; o2 S$ F' C4 ~( h3 d. I  ]3 Q) o大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
7 q) l8 t6 [  g' i  O6 W
I agree you points that it could be illegal' p/ A. u$ ]5 d2 {) F, d# v
but that is still a "gray area"! X6 O4 I% ~8 N/ \5 ?2 q. ?
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair) X% R/ o, `5 e0 q7 J
) [. C+ h2 K$ V! F3 M/ }" z
anyway, I want to say that is
! ~5 Z0 a2 a. b) k4 r3 N/ |! z3 A% Bwho is supposed to be protected by laws& f: h& f: ~. e$ I' J( T( a8 `) h* Q
creators?
, V3 [* |: z$ Sbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
# `' w! n) r' ]1 z7 O/ U3 ilet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
0 e+ ^. W# z2 |( Z' w% ^when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those' O) ]7 }9 w# l2 M
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:3 @' _3 j* `% m$ l) J2 d1 g. X
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
9 n; b, j0 e$ ~0 G我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
' N- D/ e1 `  }' B" t* G
3 k4 |! e' L$ z: ^我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
3 V4 `! Z' `6 Y) c0 x7 e唔係喎!9 x7 @' o, _6 ]5 ^; K- }
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
( u# T! W4 `$ E6 T" X$ q我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!* K* h0 R) d" `4 L
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
) ^+ R' D& Y5 C, z: @2 c就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
) P2 w) X9 r& C5 H5 x& N2 q2 o一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
. I, U: ^# f6 v* X9 Y0 `9 b8 udun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
# B1 n3 [! c4 T: cif so bad, dun download la, right?6 b4 j8 O/ S8 L( X8 G
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
5 L+ V. \- r! q9 tbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
1 O$ S1 q0 ?% fno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
; O; N6 r  w) M2 a: |so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society, L4 @  H' M  [; J; G
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
  v1 N2 ^6 b0 Ewhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!& h- Y& A  B* ^+ X! V8 N7 l7 q
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!$ v/ i7 z1 u4 r5 O
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
% e9 c+ r2 S" d) p" ?6 `) ~5 {' F政府想比下馬威0的人~~
6 @  ]& `( c! A% O$ r+ x4 Q2 Y錢就一定罰
+ g: _# F/ }7 R+ z( [+ ]) c未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
- X6 i4 {9 Y) \% N- b5 B( Y唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?  R; q) ~2 {7 d, P
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
$ Q# C9 F5 {) F) g6 p到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。